Sunday, 7 March 2010

Tie-ins, Quiz books, Saturday Evening and Trivia Trains

If you’ve ever checked out my quiz website you might have seen that I have a page all about tie in quizbooks from various TV or radio quizzes. I’ll admit it, I do have a love of tie-in quizbooks, the good, the bad and even the downright ugly. It all started when Mrs. Londinius bought me the First TV Top of the Form Quiz Book from a church jumble sale a couple of years ago. Published in 1968, and based on the BBC TV show of the same name, it packs 700 questions into 128 pages. I didn’t expect a lot in terms of quality, but actually considering that its for kids it ain’t bad, and I’ve used quite a lot of questions from it in my quizzes over the last few years. Which led to me acquiring the other 7 books in the series. In the meantime Mrs. L. had come up trumps from another fete/charity shop with the New ( new in 1982 ) Ask the Family Quiz Book. I liked that too, and so collected the three previous ones. And so on and so forth.

I now have a collection of about 80 tie-in books. They vary vastly in quality. As a rough rule of thumb I tend to like the older ones better. I find they’re a bit more honest, although there are some tie-in books published since 2000 which I like. The three 15 – 1 books ( 2000 for 2000, 2001 for 2001 and you’ve guessed it, 2002 for 2002 ) are honest , no nonsense quiz books, and always worth dipping into for a few questions whenever I set a quiz and I’m stuck. Likewise the three Weakest Link books. The Eggheads book is a little on the easy side, but its OK, and the People’s Quiz book is great for pretty recent popular culture and entertainment questions.

As tie-ins go, for me no others can compare with the 1978 University Challenge book, published by Arrow, the Round Britain quizbook – a 1975 BBC effort, and probably the daddy of them all, John P. Wynn’s 1972 Brain of Britain quiz book. These are all fiendish. Too hard to use in the pub quiz, these are just a pleasure to work through by yourself.

Why am I rambling on about this ? Well its just that I had another of those pieces of luck yesterday morning. Mrs. L. asked me to drive her and a friend over to a church fete , and on the basis of – you never know if there’ll be anything there if you don’t take a look – I ambled over to the bookstall, and the Radio 1 Quiz Kid quiz book caught my eye. Under the circumstances it would have been rude to haggle over the 50p asking price.



As you can see from the front cover, its rather an ugly little devil, isn’t it. Personally I think I just about recall Quiz Kid from the mid 70s. It was presented by wrinkly old Fluff Freeman, and in the last series by Kid Jensen ( well, everyone was a kid when compared to Alan Freeman ) . It was a pop music quiz between, well, kids. That’s about it.

I started leafing through it yesterday, and I have to say I was really pleasantly surprised. It was put together by Tony Hale, whose baby Quiz Kid actually was. Just a quick shufty through the first quiz shows a number of chestnuts – or what were chestnuts back in the day when the book was published in 1977. For example : -

4) – Who was the lead singer with Amen Corner ?
6) – Who is Ernest Evans better known as ?
14) – Which family said “You Can Do Magic in 1973 ?


Yet in amongst those there’s a testing variety of more cryptic questions such as –

3) – What is the connection between Motown and MC5 ?

It’s the answers section of this book , though , which really lifts it out of the ordinary. 55 out of 123 pages are just taken up with answers, and the reason why they take so much of the book is that you get so much explanation with them. For example, here's the answer the book gives you to just the first question I quoted : -

4) Andy Fairweather – Low. This welsh rock-pop band had considerable teen appeal and chart success, in the late 60s with hit singles such as “Bend Me, Shape Me” (1968) High in the Sky (1968) Half As Nice ( 1969 ) Fairweather Low’s vocal style, distinctly high-pitched and semi strangled graced the charts again after a lay off with “Reggae Tune” in late 1974, and “Wide Eyed and Legless” in 1975.

I shan’t give you the full answers given in the book to the rest, but you can see what I mean from this, I’m sure. The other answers were

5) Chubby Checker
14)Limmie and the Family Cookin’
3) The City of Detroit.


This level of explanation – well , to be honest ANY level of explanation – is very rare in a quiz book, and a huge plus point for me. A real little gem.
------------------------------------------------------------------
I also recently bought Dean Wilkinson’s Classic Children’s Television quiz book. 113 out of 148 pages are given over to the questions, which is a plus point. There’s not a huge amount of explanation on the answers pages, but on each themed set of questions there is an interesting introduction, and a set of Did You Knows after each set of questions. I consider myself pretty well versed on Children’s TV – well, after all I was one once, and I’ve had five of my own ( children that is, not TVs ) , but I hadn’t already heard all of the Did You Knows, so that’s something. The book isn’t perfect – when the question is a multiple choice one for example, the options often contain one which is just silly, making it a fifty fifty choice. It’s a small quibble though. Dean Wilkinson has worked in children’s TV himself. This book is very much a labour of love and I’m a sucker for enthusiasm. For anyone who grew up watching TV in the 70s or 80s this is all very infectious, and I went through it all in one sitting. I’m not a great one for specialist or themed quiz books, but I really enjoyed this one.

If you want to read any more about TV Tie in Quiz Books, then you can visit the page on my website by clicking on this link : -

TV and Radio Tie In Quiz Books

------------------------------------------------------

By pure coincidence, Dean Wilkinson's book has a foreword by Ant and Dec, and last night I spent a precious half hour of my life watching the first part of their new prime time offering Push The Button. Alright, nobody forced me to do it, but on the offchance that the show might actually have some quiz content I gritted my teeth and watched.

I'm not going to be snotty about this. Push The Button is firmly in the category of game show, and as such I have no real right to criticise. Its not for me, but if other people enjoy it then that's great. Basically it involves two family teams of five - a la Family Fortunes. The two families compete in individual head to heads to - no, not to win money, but to stop their prize pot of £100,000 at the start of the show dwindling away. The team that collectively perform best will have lost least.

Oh, there was quiz content in the two games I saw. First game involved team members placing big models of tourist attractions on the right place in a giant mercator's projection map of the world. Sorry, but camera work , and Messrs McPartlin and Donnelly's antics rendered it virtually impossible to see where the lights and numbers were on the map, and whether things were going in the right place or not.

The second game involved - I kid you not - actors who have played characters killed in soap operas rising up out of their coffins, so that team members can identify their character, their show, and how they died. The two team members involved had been given a big book to learn prior to the show. Like I said, it wasn't for me, but the two Geordie lads are an engaging pair, whose cheeky chappiesh charm works well for this vehicle. I just wish it wasn't so damned slow. Two games in half an hour isn't a lot for your money. Still, it would have had to have been good to prevent me hopping channels for the return of Who Dares Wins.

I never caught much of the first run of this series, when it was aired in 2007/8, and rumour has it that this second series was actually recorded quite some time ago. If you've never seen it, that blokey, breezy Nick Knowles hosts a game between two pairings of contestants, who will have never met before their first appearence in the show.One of these will be the defending champions, since its winner stays on. The two parings battle it out in a best of three format. A category will be announced - last night's first was Will Smith films, and teams will have to bid against each other as to how many they can name - sort of a reverse Name that Tune. When they are satisfied that the bidding is high enough, one team will tell the other to name them. So if the team bid 10 and name 10, they take the point. If they bid 10 and name 9, then the other team win the point. Got it ? I should think so. Its simplicity is one of this show's selling points.

It seems to me that this show has a similar appeal to Pointless - which incidentally starts again on BBC2 next week, I believe. They do show all of the alternatives, but not for anything like long enough if you're playing along at home. Still, you can pause it on the iplayer.

The winning team get a chance at the cash. Nick announces a category, and 15 correct answers brings £50,000, with lesser amounts for 3 answers - etc. in regular amounts up the ladder. The champs failed on their first shot, which escapes me at the moment, but collected the lot for naming 15 British medallists - of any colour medal- in the Beijing Olympics. Even if this was recorded a lot closer to when the Olympics were run in 2008 it was still a very fine achievement.

Its not a bad show at all, although it ain't perfect. I don't like shows being interrupted for the flippin' Lotto for one thing. For another, the vast majority of last night's categories were Entertainment based. Yeah, I know that the general public likes Entertainment. But out of 7 categories in th show, including the two jackpots, only 50 Biggest Countries of the World and British Beijing Medallists weren't from that category. Will I watch again, though ? Yes, I will. It beats the hell out of Nick Knowles' Guesstimation last year.

----------------------------------------------------

One of the categories on Who Dares Wins started me off on a train of thought, the like of which I think of as a trivia train. Allow me to explain. The champs were asked to name a number of characters from Only Fools and Horses who have appeared in more than one episode. They started off very confidently with the regulars - Del, Rodney, Cassandra, Raquel, Damien, Granddad, Uncle Albert. However they stumbled when they incorrectly recalled the name of the bent copper who was Raquel's first husband as Skinner, when it was in fact Slater.

So what train of thought did this lead to ? Well, Slater was played by Jim Broadbent. I watched Terry Gilliam's highly enjoyable Time Bandits again last week, and Jim Broadbent plays a very small cameo role. Which led to the trivia train of thought giving me this question -

Two british actors who have won oscars during their careers both played cameo roles in Time Bandits. Name them.

Sean Connery, who played Agamemnon should come straightaway, but Broadbent who played a TV gameshow host is more difficult. The danger with this one is you might plump for Ralph Richardson who played The Supreme Being. He was twice nominated, but never won. Or possibly you might try Ian Holm, who played Napoleon. He was nominated once, but didn't win.
The trouble is that once you board the trivia train its difficult to get off. Ian Holm then.

Both Ian Holm and Kenny Baker, who also appeared in Time Bandits, have which other film link, that they share with Brigitte Helm, Lock Martin, Brent Spiner and others ?

The answer of course is that they have all played robots or androids on film - Ian Holm was the android Ash in Aliens - Kenny Baker as you know was R2D2 in Star Wars - Brigitte Helm, a bit trickier, was both Maria and the Maria robot in Fritz Lang's Metropolis - Lock Martin was the giant robot Gort in the 1950s The Day The Earth Stood Still, and Brent Spiner was the android Data in all of those Star Trek The Next Generation movies.
The train rumbled on, but I'm sure you'll be delighted to know that I shan't bore you with all the stops this particular one called at.

Friday, 5 March 2010

Mastermind - First Round Heat 20/34

Mastermind – First Round – Heat 20 / 24

Quizwise its been a good week. Wins on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday brought me a bottle of wine ( given away to the last placed team ) , a share in a £40 prize, and a meal for 4. OK, so it hasn’t been quite the perfect week since we were beaten last night in the Rugby Club. No excuses – it was a good quiz and Rob’s team played better than we did. . Still, as I say, a pretty good week, and what better way to bring it to a conclusion than another first round Mastermind match ?

Who did we have tonight then ? Four more newcomers, the first of whom, Brian Southgate, took The Life and Career of Sir Alex Ferguson. Sir Alex’s autobiography, Managing My Life is one of the most interesting sporting biographies I’ve read , so this subject certainly made me sit up and take notice. Brian Southgate correctly spoke of Sir Alex as the most successful British manager of the modern football era. He let a couple of sitters go, but most of his answers found the back of the net, and he set the bar at 14, a good score on a fascinating subject.

Mark Francis followed Mr. Southgate into the chair. His subject , 17th century English history, was something of a throwback to the early years of Mastermind, when such seemingly catch-all specialist subjects were far more common. After all, under such a heading you can reasonably ask about so many things that revising it must be a nightmare. So under these circumstances Mr. Francis’ 10 looked like a decent performance. However 4 points is a hell of a lead to try to claw back in the GK round.

Journalist Laura Morris, who revealed to us that her grandmother once made her a replica Star Trek Voyager uniform for a fan convention offered us, well, Star Trek Voyager. I’ll be honest , while I enjoyed Star Trek , The Next Generation and even Deep Space Nine, I never really ‘got’ Voyager. I don’t know about you , but when I play along at home I like to get at least one answer right in each of the specialist subjects, and this one looked like it might be my Achilles tonight. So I was grateful when we were served up the gentle lob that was “Who played Captain Janeway ? “ for the first question. Laura Morris fell into something of a pass spiral in the middle of the round, but still managed a score of 9.

Finally Philip Evison took his place in the chair, to make his bid with the subject of the Life and Work of Sir Edward Elgar. For a fair bit of the round it seemed as if Mr. Evison knew the answers to the questions he was being asked, but they just wouldn’t oblige by popping out of his mouth. I thought he looked nervous coming to the chair, and I’m afraid this scuppered his chances. By the end of the round he’d scored 7.

All of which meant a quick return to the chair. Now, its all subjective, I know, but I thought that Philip Evison had a relatively tough set of GK questions, and he never managed to get any momentum going at all. He gritted out a further seven points, which gave his score a nice symmetrical feel if nothing else. Laura Morris almost managed to double her score as well, although she levelled out at 8. Was it me, or did John Humphrys seem to be rather taken with Laura Morris ? He positively oozed charm as he took her through her three passes.

At this stage it looked as if it was going to be something of a formality for Brian Southgate. Then Mark Francis strode to the chair for his GK round. I’ll be honest, the second half of this week’s show had been crying out for someone to grab it by the neck , and really give it a good old go. Thankfully Mark Francis proceeded to do just that. It wasn’t perfect, no, and I thought that his set of questions was a little kinder than Philip Evison’s had been, but all the same he delivered a barnstorming performance to put another thirteen on the board, and raise his score to 23. This at least meant that Brian Southgate was going to have to get into double figures to win without a pass countback. To be fair, he managed it, but it was only the last question which saw him edge his nose across the finishing line. So well done Mr. Southgate, and good luck next round. Commiserations to Mark Francis. It won’t come as much of a consolation, but it does prove the old adage – you can win the show on your general knowledge if you haven’t lost it on your specialist.

The Details

Brian Southgate The Life and Career of Sir Alex Ferguson 14 – 1 10 – 4 24 – 5
Mark Francis 17th Century English History 10 – 0 13 – 1 23 – 1
Laura Morris Star Trek – Voyager 9-6 8 – 3 17 – 9
Philip Evison The Life and Career of Sir Edward Elgar 7 – 3 7 – 2 14 – 5


Current Highest Scoring Runners Up

John Cooper29 – 3
Ian Scott Massie26 – 2
Les Morrell26 - 3
Colin Wilson25 - 0
Peter Cowans25 - 2
William de'Ath25 - 4


Thursday, 4 March 2010

Andrew's Account of Only Connect Audition, Round 1and Quarter Final

As promised, I am delighted to present to you Andrew Bull's account of the Archers Admirers' audition and first round performance in Only Connect.

I’d watched most of the first series of Only Connect, and when I saw an invitation for applications online, started asking among other quiz fans I know if they’d also be interested in taking part. Paul and Min were both keen, so now we had to come up with our team connection - “quizzing” being a bit obvious. An early thought was “Snoopy Fans”, but Paul being more of a Calvin and Hobbes fan, this was ruled out. In the end, the fact that Paul and Min had met through being fans of “The Archers” made a more tangible link, and I had at least listened to the show quite a lot - so the “Archers Admirers” we were.

And so, we sent in our application form, and received a set of Only Connect style questions to attempt. We submitted our answers, and… didn’t hear back. Series 2 of Only Connect took place without us. And seeing two people I know in another team only made us more determined to try again.

So a few months later we re-applied for Series 3 (this time with Paul nominally as captain), and maybe we did rather better on the “quiz” element of the form - or we attached nicer photos - or standards were lower because they needed more teams - in any event, this time we were invited to audition. Hooray!

One painful drive across to Cardiff in mid-November saw us arriving in a state of mild panic about 2 seconds before we were due. We were guided to a rather bleak office room where Peter (producer) and Georgie (contestant wrangler) were far too charming to point out how fine we were cutting it. Brushing aside our apologies involving speed restrictions, Peter launched into a quite awesomely long spiel about the show. Paul and I had seen most episodes, Min had seen one *and* we’d explained it at length *and* we’d gone through the quiz on the form - but “to be fair to people who hadn’t seen the show”, he went through it again. My goodness, but he’s (quite rightly) proud of his show. His spiel did, to be fair, include some “behind the scenes” stuff that we didn’t know; for instance, the length of the final round can vary from 90 to 150 seconds, and is determined largely by the speed with which the earlier questions had been answered (and the amount - and quality - of banter). It also included a lot about the sort of connections the show includes, how it’s not all about knowing obscure facts - though that comes into it - but it’s spotting links that counts. He was very much preaching to the choir here... but eventually, we’d finished the teas and coffees that Georgie had brought us, and it was time to show just how good (or not) we were at the game...

But first, we had to show that we could cope with some brief banter about the Archers and maybe some of our other interests. Min and Paul could clearly chat about the show easily - I managed to say how I found it a good show to listen to during a Sunday morning lie-in, or walking home after a long day in the office. We all managed to talk while being filmed without panicking to Peter’s satisfaction, and the brainwork could begin.

Round 1, as we were by now very much aware, is about finding the connection between 4 items (and the fewer items you need to spot it, the better). Well, we were - not hopeless, but certainly not good. We managed to connect 3 of the 5 groups, but were being too tentative - except when we were being too keen to take more clues - or forgetting to. But it wasn’t a complete disaster, and we had three more rounds to redeem ourselves…

(Incidentally, Rounds 1, 2 and 4 were “played” on a lap-top, and I had the job of pressing a key each time we wanted another clue, or to move to the next question. Quite a nice touch, as it gives more of a feel for the show than having it all on paper).

Round 2 is similar, except you now have to work out what the 4th item is going to be from the first 3 (the items now forming a sequence) - again, it’s better not to use all the clues. This went rather better, though again we missed a couple of connections, but we were showing better teamwork, and Peter looked slightly happier.

Round 3 - The Wall - comprises 4 groups of 4 shuffled together at random, and you have to divide the 16 items back into those 4 groups - but there are red herrings, false links... you name it, they try to confuse you with it. (Unlike the other rounds, this was played in the low-tech way - 16 pieces of paper to rearrange… so not quite the same as on TV as you get no feedback about whether your attempts are right or wrong). This went OK, except for one group defeating us completely, but again we were co-operating quite well.

So after 3 rounds of working as a team to spot groups of 4, round 4 is rather different - you’re given a phrase with all the vowels removed, with spaces inserted at random (so “Only Connect” could become “NL YCN NCT”), and just have to name that phrase! Finally, a triumph, as we managed to spot all 5 phrases, and Peter and Georgie were now beaming at us. We made a mental note to try to be quick in the earlier rounds and so make the final round longer - though to be honest, it’s probably difficult to influence this.

It’s always good to end on a high, and we were cautiously optimistic as Paul drove us back to Cheltenham. After all, they’d talked at some length about how to challenge a wrong answer during filming - they wouldn’t do that if we were hopeless, would they? (You wait until the end of the question - that way, if your challenge is wrong, it’s less of a break in the flow of filming and you aren’t giving the other team vital thinking time).

Anyway, a few days later, just as our optimism was starting to ebb, Min received the vital phone call - we were in! After a bit of haggling over our team name - “Archers Admirers” was a bit long, but “Archers Fans” is a bit bland and “Archers Addicts” is a genuine society of - well - Archers addicts - and the captaincy (it would look “more balanced” with Min as captain, Paul was told, so he graciously deferred), we were ready to go. We struggled our way through the practice papers, and were amused to get a practice DVD featuring the people I know. Don’t worry, we were told - with the extra round this year, the questions will be easier.

Having arrived (nearly) late for the audition, we were taking no chances for the programme itself, and stayed overnight in Cardiff - in a hotel which, ironically, showed every Freeview channel except BBC4 - so we were able to arrive at the studio bright(?) and fresh(?) for the 9:30 start. In fact, we got there about 20 minutes early, taking Georgie slightly by surprise. But we were shown into the “rubber room” - a large, slightly soulless room with a few chairs and sofas - for a cup of coffee while they waited for people to arrive. Soon we were shown to our changing room to have our outfits inspected (nothing white, or black, or stripy - well, that‘s 90% of my wardrobe excluded), and to have the rules explained to us again. Plus some specifics related to filming, like “no swearing” - so we exchanged our jolly tales about people swearing on camera under pressure... but it was really hard to edit out, so *please* don’t. (It dawned on us that you can’t simply stop and re-shoot that easily on Only Connect - you either give a team extra thinking time, or you plough on, then make them fake their “thinking aloud” in an unconvincing retake). Oh, and remember how the questions were to be easier this series? Well, don‘t expect them to be much easier. And as we were such a good team, they’d matched us up against another very strong team, so it’d make a good show. Gee, thanks… (In fact, later conversation suggests that teams are largely paired up by what days are most convenient for them to attend).

After being moisturised and powdered in make-up, we were soon judged to be presentable enough for the BBC4 viewing public. Then we were led off to be miked up - an awkward process in which a young man clips a microphone to your clothing, trying to conceal the wires, while you try to listen to what Georgie’s asking you about your introductory spiel. It was at this point that we met the other team - the “Music Lovers”, at least two of whom looked familiar from watching quizzes. OK - this wasn’t going to be the nice easy opening match I’d been hoping for...

The most familiar of them - Steve Kidd - was clearly a “bit of a character” who informed us that he’s planning to stand as an independent in the next election. (He’s also, we found out afterwards, won £250,000 on Millionaire... well, we’ve quizzed against Pat Gibson, who went two better! Admittedly, we *lost* to his team, but still…)

Into the studio! Paul and I had done this before (on Countdown, plus Paul has done 15-to-1 and Brainteaser), and the studio was in some ways very like the one in Leeds - the set looking impressive from the front, and apparently held together with sticky tape and propped up with cardboard from behind. Lots of curtains to hide the “behind the scenes” people, making it very hard to see anything when you were entering or leaving - especially when they helpfully put a black chair in a silly place. But, most importantly, there was the familiar Only Connect set complete with “Paul Peters - Min Lacey - Andrew Bull” displayed on the front. Cool!

Before launching into the show, we were to have a practice run. This is no bad thing - you get to see what things look like, where they will appear, and so forth, so you aren’t completely thrown by the real thing. For instance: you discover you actually look at a 2-by-2 block of clues on a screen, not a line of 4 as appears on TV; and the blue line to indicate the time running out is actually just a clock counting down in the middle of the screen. And the much criticised Greek letters are, in fact, written out as “Alpha, Beta” etc. We also discovered that Min was a bit low down on her chair, so was provided with a cushion to sit on. (Incidentally, the only thing on the narrow desk - apart from the buzzer - is a glass of water each, which I duly managed to spill most of. No pen and paper, so you have to discuss ideas out loud - and hope you aren’t giving clues to the other team!)

So Hywel, the friendly floor manager (honestly - everyone really was that friendly) inveigled producer Peter to stand in as question master. We went through our practice of rounds 1, 2 and 4, of which I remember very little, except for Peter’s mock complaints about this not being what he’d signed up for... and the other team were A Bit Good. And seemed to be better at picking easy questions. Or maybe we were just worse at answering them. And the Missing Vowels round, where we’d shone in the audition - pretty much a tie. Oh help...

Min won the toss, and we opted to let the Music Lovers go first. “Vicky’s not going to like that”, Hywel told us... for some reason, if the team on her right (us) wins the toss and opts to go second, she gets confused. So we’ve stumbled through the practice and now inadvertently annoyed the host…

Ms Coren duly arrived on set, greeting us all cheerfully while the finishing touches to her make-up were completed. On being informed of the result of the toss, we discovered that this hadn’t been a joke - she grumbled about how this was the one scenario that she always managed to get wrong. And before we knew it, we were filming... “Keep looking at Vicky!” we were told - like I needed telling...

You might expect the main problem when you’re a quiz show contestant is that you’ll freeze under the lights. That may be true for some people, but (in my very brief experience) I’ve tended to have the opposite problem - everyone’s so friendly and keen to put you at ease that I relax, and act as if I’m watching the show with friends. Which is all very well, until I have a sudden thought “Oh ****! This isn’t a relaxing watch at home - I’m on TV and I need to say something, or I’ll look like an idiot!”

And so the game began. As we struggled our way through round 1, we discovered that Georgie was quite right - the questions weren’t much easier. At least, not to us… We had a good start, picking up a bonus on their picture question - Min spotting that a picture was of Petra, so the link was Blue Peter pets. We followed this up with our first set: 2 complete non-entities plus Will Stutely could perhaps have led us to “Merry Men”. Playing it safe to start, we took the fourth clue - Much the Miller’s Son - and got the point; but the Music Lovers immediately caught us up by picking up 2 points on their next set, while we failed on ours. They then picked up 2 more points on their final set, leaving us the dreaded music question. We had at least had a nice moment here when Min had buzzed in to say “We don’t know”, meeting VC’s approval - but no points, and a bonus to our opponents, leaving us 5-2 down at the end of the round. They were looking annoyingly relaxed, while it began to dawn on us that we needed to pull our socks up or our stay in Cardiff would be disappointingly brief.

Oh well, we tend to do better in Round 2. And so it proved again, as we finally picked an easy(ish) question to start, followed this with an educated guess which paid off, and picked up a bonus to catch our opponents, finishing the round at 8-8. This wasn’t too bad given how we’d ended Round 1, and we were back in the game.

At this point, we had to do some retakes of the introductions - more entertaining than it sounds, because of VC’s tendency to change her questions each time - according to her blog, this is because she’s too short-sighted to read the autocue! She also had an entertaining habit of saying “why can I not speak? Why didn’t you get a professional?” whenever she messed up a line. Min coped admirably with answering questions again, and it was time for the next round.

Round 3 - The Wall - is a bit different, in that it’s filmed in a different part of the studio, with each team tackling their walls separately. As we’d gone second in the first two rounds, we would be going first here - which meant we had to do The Walk.

If you watch the show on TV, you may notice that only one team is shown approaching the board with VC (even this is a “blink and you’ll miss it” moment)... this is in fact filmed in a bare bit of studio, and made to look like an approach to the board by the magic of television. So we rehearsed walking 3 steps forward to exactly the right spot, without looking down too obviously, and (in my case) without being distracted by having VC walking towards me. (Or by our opponents, still on set, waving at us). Or indeed by VC being told that her bra-strap was showing, and reducing everyone to hysterics with the comment “These things don’t stay in place by themselves, you know...”

We now left the studio so that the other team could practise playing The Wall. My memory is pretty vague about this bit, but I think we told each other that at least we hadn’t embarrassed ourselves, and had got back into the game.

Soon we were back in the studio for our go at practising playing The Wall... we discovered that, when choosing from Wall Alpha and Wall Beta, you are actually looking at a blank screen! I can’t remember too much about the practice round except that I was the first to say anything after an awkward pause, and that we got the four groups out, though we didn’t identify one of them (Stone, Milestone, Ford and Lean - all Oscar winning film directors) - but VC assured us that no-one got that one.

Time for the real thing... it’s amazing how blank your mind can go when faced with a random-looking set of 16 things, and 150 seconds to make something of them. Again, no-one was saying anything so I felt I had to - “some of them are comics”. Unfortunately, we couldn’t find the set of four. We also spotted some “things you could cut” - Gordian knot, ribbon and mustard (a good spot from Min) - but couldn’t find the fourth. Still no groups of four, and a minute had passed. This round could be a disaster... Min spotted a fifth comic, and Paul started trying out all the options, and eventually this paid off. Up and running, one minute left... While we were trying a few options for the fourth thing you could cut, we suddenly noticed that “deck” had been staring us in the face… Relief - 30 seconds to go - could we find one more group and complete the board? Suddenly, with fewer options, we realised that an idea we’d vaguely mentioned earlier - lunar modules - was right, and we found the quartet. But the logic behind the final set was still a mystery at this stage...

We now had to identify the links: “comics” was easy enough, as was “things you can cut”, and “lunar modules” was right as well. And the last set... at the last second, Min had a flash of inspiration and realised they were “nicknames of famous people”. Phew!

We were led out as the Music Lovers were brought back and, as instructed, we kept quiet about how we’d done until we were safely out of earshot. We now knew we’d be at worst all square for the final round, and (as we kept assuring each other) it would be good TV. All too soon, we were taken back into the studio... it was slightly surprising that we still weren’t told how Round 3 had gone, but by signalling at the other team, we established that we were indeed all square. Then we were told that we’d have the full two-and-a-half minutes for this round. At this point, I began to panic... we’d kept in the game by the skin of our teeth thanks to some flashes of inspiration - largely from Min - but this was, in theory, my chance to shine - for some reason, I’m usually good at the missing vowels round. But the practice hadn’t been a triumph... I started to babble to my team-mates about how I’d freeze, or keep buzzing in too fast (which is very much a mistake, as you lose a point and the question goes to the other team). I’m not sure if this was just an attempt to psyche myself up, or to apologise in advance. At any rate, it seemed to work, as for the first set - French phrases - I managed to get the first answer. And the second. The third one was pretty tough, but just as VC said “have to hurry you”, I spotted it. Then the fourth answer - hang on, haven’t we had that already - yes, because it’s D JV - déjà vu - very good! So I completed a full set, while some of the others hadn’t seen the joke and their protests had to be shouted down by VC.

The next set was another full set for us, and I began to relax a little - surely they couldn’t peg back an 8 point lead? They began to buzz in now, and at times began to make a comeback, but we managed to maintain our lead pretty well, finally ending up with a “comfortable” win, 35-24. Hooray! Congratulations from VC for our storming last round, and quarter-finals here we come!

So we headed off the set feeling pretty pleased, and Georgie and co couldn’t wait to tell us how well we’d done - all very gratifying. As we headed off to lunch, Min and VC both took the opportunity for a fag break, and Min took the opportunity to tell VC what a huge fan she was of her father Alan (the late, much beloved journalist). The canteen happened to be serving Christmas lunch, so it all felt very festive as we discussed how we’d done, eyed up the contestants who’d arrived for the next heat, and shared congratulations and commiserations as appropriate with the other team. After we’d finished the meal, Min and I had a pep talk from Steve Kidd, whose attitude was clearly that if he couldn’t win, he wanted to lose to the champions…

We now had a fairly lengthy wait - mostly sat in the dressing room - as we wound down from the excitement of filming, while the second heat of the day took place. Paul spotted one of the teams - the Exeter Alumni, a young all-male team - during their opponents’ Wall round, but was deftly shooed away by Jenny, the other contestant wrangler. We chatted about various things, including how we’d done, and Georgie popped in now and then to check we were still there. We asked her how the contestants had been that series, and she said that most of them were quite friendly, although she’d been disappointed not to get a hug from them the day before - so we now knew what our duty was at the end of the day! Eventually, Georgie returned to tell us we’d be getting ready for the quarter-final in a few minutes. I started to worry that I’d lost focus completely, and that our opponents, fresh from their victory, would thrash us.

Back on set, we found we were competing against the Exeter Alumni, who we gathered had won their heat fairly narrowly. No practice this time - we were all ready to launch into the quiz (this time sitting on VC’s left) - but again we’d be going second, as the Alumni had opted to go first. So VC was pleased, as were we, going second being our preferred strategy. After about six attempts for the sound people to be happy with the positioning of my microphone, we were ready to kick off.

This times both teams struggled somewhat with Round 1, and again we got the unwanted Music question but this time Paul, our classical music buff, knew the first two tunes, giving us 3 useful points. The Alumni also managed one of their questions, and a bonus each meant we’d come through a tricky round with a 4-3 lead. We then had a break in filming as apparently someone had referred to the Queen in the picture question as “The Queen Mother”. VC denied it was her, and took the opportunity to tell us that you should never bet on the Queen wearing a yellow hat. It transpired that Min had said “Queen Mother”, but was happy for the faux pas to be left in, so we continued.
Round 2 was, again, more successful, as we picked what were perhaps some of the more straightforward questions. These together with a lucky guess for a bonus (cancelling out an unlucky one), took us to a satisfying 11-3 lead. Showing how much more relaxed we were by this stage, we had a minor argument amongst ourselves over out last question, drawing an amused comment from VC (sadly not on camera!)

As before, we had to do “The Walk” for Round 3, and then we went into the real thing - no rehearsal this time. It was suggested that Min should stand on a box to make us more even in height - but this resulted in her towering over us, so the idea was quietly dropped. Again, we were slightly slow to get started, but this time, once we got into our stride, things went much better and we managed to get the full 10 points much more easily. This time we could relax a bit while the other team were filming, as we couldn’t have less than an 8 point lead… in fact, it turned out that we were going into Round 4 with a 14 point lead, as they’d struggled with a nasty Wall. I was a bit concerned that the monitor was now reflecting too much light for me to read it, until VC overheard our concerns, and asked Hywel to adjust it for us. That sorted, we were much more relaxed this time in the Missing Vowels, and it again went well for us as we completed a 33-9 win, so the day ended in triumph. Commiserations with our unlucky opponents, Paul gallantly initiated hugs all round from Georgie, and we made our way home through the miserable weather, ready to fight another day.

So, how was our experience of the day overall? Well, obviously it helped that we won both our games... but I’d say it was a truly fantastic day. Everyone at the studio is going out of their way to make sure you enjoy yourself - they want happy, relaxed contestants having a good time and doing their best on the show - and they did a wonderful job of it. I know that it’s left me wanting to go in for more quizzes, and Min has already applied to go on Mastermind...

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Only Connect ( Sorry for the delay)

Only Connect – Quarter Final Match ¼ - The Archers Admirers v. The Exeter Alumni

Titans of the first round, the Archers Admirers strode into battle once more to pit themselves against The Exeter Alumni. The Exeter Alumni, in case you’ve forgotten are Ian Pithouse, Ben Howarth and Captain Sam Charman. They beat the Gourmands by 23 points to 20 in one of the finest matches of the first round, which they put down to good conferring and random guesses. Hey, if it works for you, don’t knock it. As for the Archers Admirers, regular LAM readers Paul Peters and Andrew Bull flanked captain Min Lacey. They won the first match of the series, a fantastic and high scoring match which saw them beat fancied runners the Music Lovers by 35 points to 24. Min Lacey wins my favourite quote of the week as she explained that in their first round they weren’t proud of “The fact that we froze in front of the grid like cornered baboons for more than a minute “. Well, what she didn’t say is that they solved that wall well in the end. Lets get on with the show.

Round One – What’s The Connection ?

On their first set, the Alumni talked their way all around the correct answer without managing quite to get it spot on. South Korea = W , Thailand = B gave them the won and the baht, but L for Great Britain foxed them . Their answer – French names for currency was close but earned no metaphorical cigar. The Archers had it with symbols for currency. Yes, that’s right, the £ sign is just a glorified letter L. They failed on their own set, the pictures, the (Superbowl ? ) Gatorade shower, the Chancellor’s Budget day tie, the Queen’s hat for Ascot, and a roulette wheel. Neither team saw that you can all bet on the colour of these things, and neither did I. Well, they promised it would be harder for the quarter finals. The Alumni’s next set was a good old quizzer’s set. Barbarella’s enemy gave us Duran Duran. Bobby Kennedy’s assassin gave us Sirhan Sirhan. Got it yet ? The Alumni did, but they took Gary and Phil Neville’s father, Neville Neville to be sure. The Archers took the sound question. They made short work of Beethoven’s 7th and a song from the film Snow white and the 7 Dwarves, to see that the link was 7. 3 points in the bag and a slight lead, thank you very much.The Alumni’s third question was, I think, possibly my finest hour of the whole show. Castor and Pollux, Brahma, Yoshi and Orville the Duck stumped both teams. All were born from an egg. I knew that Castor and Pollux were, and the presence of a bird and a reptile in the list gave me the answer – I didn’t know that Brahma was too. Enough boasting. I said things were getting more difficult in the quarters and the Archers found this with their next set – March – The Penelopiad – Wide Sargasso Sea – and Wicked. They knew that they were continuations of books by other authors, and when given a second bite offered prequels, but Victoria needed that they were rewritten from another character’s point of view. This was what the Alumni offered, to take the final score for the round to 4 to the Archers and 3 to the Alumni.

Round Two – What Comes Fourth ?

Weatherfield – McLibel – NatWest – what comes next ? The Alumni got as far as court cases, but no further. The Archers though correctly predicted Guildford, as in Weatherfield 1, McLibel 2 etc. Great shout. Theirs was Memorial – Independence – Labor Both teams were correct to identify US public holidays, but both Veterans and Thanksgiving were wrong, and Columbus was right. The Alumni were offered Central = 1 Circle=2 District =3. They offered Metropolitan, correctly seeing that London Tube lines were involved. But it wasn’t the right one. The Archers guessed Bakerloo correctly, without realising that the colours of the lines on the map represented their value as balls in snooker – red for Central being worth 1 etc. Lovely, intricate connection . Difficult to get until its pointed out, but a little beauty for a quarter final, I thought. Considering the intricacy of this connection, I thought that the Archers’ cervical – thoracic – lumbar was rather straightforward, wanting sacral as the next section of the vertical column. Altogether now everyone , its just the luck of the draw. The pictures foxed the Alumni, while the Archers saw Utah, Omaha ( card game ) Gold as the D-day beaches from the west to east, but zigged with sword when they should have zagged with Juno. On only 2 clues the Archers worked out that the word one would be spelt out 663 with predictive texting. Puzzlers supreme, the Archers had stretched their lead , as the score at the end of the round was 11 – 3.

Round Three – The Connecting Walls

If you’re a regular you’ll know that I’m an Ealing boy, so I salute whoever set Ealing films as one of the sets . The Archers, now with the bit firmly between the teeth, polished off this set, and sets of famous riots, ends in UK test cricket grounds, and constellations, in double quick time. This was a highly impressive way to earn full marks. So the Alumni had some serious work to do with theirs. Cricket commentators fell to them in no time. A set of words or phrases which follow ‘on your ‘ was next, and more than a minute remained. Three incorrect guesses later the wall froze. So no full marks, and they failed to identify a set of words originating from Irish, or a set of words which, if the last letter is moved to the start form an entirely new word, eg- angled and dangle. So the lead was beginning to look a winning won, as the Archers led by 21 - 7

Round One – Missing Vowels

Set one , shrubs, fell heavily to the Archers, with only Mock Orange escaping their greedy grasp. 3 – 0 to the Archers. The second category, Famous Photographers, saw the Alumni score 1, but the lead still increased. So far in this round LAM regular Andrew Bull was playing an absolute blinder. Third category, parts of a sailing ship saw the Archers showing that they were at least a little human, dropping a point on leeboard. They got all three of the other answers though. Mnemonics followed. 3 – 1 to the Archers. Time was drawing close as Victoria announced Instrumental Tracks that were UK number 1s. Only time for two, and both fell to the Archers. In the end , they ran out very comfortable winners by 33 to 9.

What a fine performance in a quarter final ! Rightly did Victoria call it astonishing. Can anyone bea. . . no, there’ll be time for that later.

Two words to finish on. Andrew of The Archers has very kindly offered to share his account of their appearances on the series with us, so I will be posting them in the near future. Something for us all to look forward to.

As for Victoria – I did think that leopard print was supposed to be rather unsophisticated, but I thought she looked fabulous in this show.

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

University Challenge

I'm reposting this in case you can't see the original : -
University Challenge – Qualification/Elimination match – Edinburgh University v. Manchester University

Lets begin by throwing the form book out of the window, shall we ? Before the start of the contest it seemed to me that all we could usefully draw as conclusions from what has gone before is that we had two battle-hardened teams, veterans of four matches each already, both of them victorious in three matches, and both of them having experienced the slings and arrows of a sudden death tie – break. I haven’t added up the cumulative totals yet, but I believe that Manchester have scored more points than Edinburgh in the competition so far. Would it matter ? Probably not. In a match such as this all bets are off.

Mr. Kimmit set out his stall early, but unfortunately his early interruption was incorrect. Manchester gratefully identified Alexander McCall Smith as the creator of Precious Ramotswe et al. Tom Whyman of Manchester buzzed in for the second starter. A set of bonuses on Shakespeare followed, though not all were taken.Nick Daunt identified a definition of Osmosis to take Manchester’s 3rd successive starter. Amazingly this was a science starter I had right ! A set on sisters with famous brothers followed, and Manchester took a full set of bonuses. Now it was regular LAM reader, Captain Jakob Whitfield who buzzed in early . He knew that the answer was Cervantes, but unfortunately it came out as Don Quixote, who was created by Cervantes. Sometimes the tongue lets you down. It didn’t let Captain Hugh Brechin of Edinburgh down as he nipped in to put Edinburgh’s first points on the board.

Hugh Brechin it was who correctly identified a quote we were given as coming from the Constitution of the United States. Again, Jakob had a near miss with the Declaration of Independence. Already it was looking a close match, and maybe a test of nerves as well. A full set of bonuses on amendments to the Constitution reduced Manchester’s lead to 20 points. Jakob Whitfield was certainly holding his nerve, and he buzzed in on the next starter to identify Covent Garden in London. The gap widened to 40. Jakob obviously found this agreed with him, so he buzzed in early for the next starter as well, to earn a set of bonuses on titles of roman officials. They took one of these.

Last week’s hero, regular LAM reader Andrew Matheson buzzed in for his first starter, identifying the word Death as missing from a set of poems by Dylan Thomas, John Donne etc. I liked it very much when the team was asked as a bonus – which word for a fugitive has the first five letters of the alphabet in the correct order. Andrew replied – oh , I know ! – hen half a second later – No I don’t ! – Your honesty is an example to us all . I didn’t get it either – its absconder. They took the other two bonuses though, and Hugh Brechin took the next starter too, identifying the Raven’s Paradox. So absorbed was I in the contest that I didn’t look at the clock until the three bonuses on synthetic plastics were correctly taken. So I know that at 13 and a half minutes Edinburgh had pulled back, so that Manchester only led by 95 to 80.

The music started hoved into view , er , into hearing range. Andrew Matheson buzzed in to guess Puccini. Incorrect, unfortunately. A puzzled looking Jakob Whitfield buzzed in with “Mozart ? “, and looked equally puzzled when JP said he was right. Rachael ( don’t worry Rach, I was going to mention you sooner or later ) and the guys obviously know their arias from their elbows as they managed a bonus on Mozart operas and characters. Tom Whyman added to the lead by buzzing in for the next starter. Interestingly up to this point I don’t think that any of the starters had gone unanswered by either of the teams, and if that’s not a tribute to the quality of the teams tonight, then I don’t now what is. The next one did, though. So it was down to Hugh Brechin to tell us that 2 to the power of ten is ten times greater than ten to the power of two ( or was it the other way round ? ) Andrew and Hugh took a full set of bonuses on the planet Mars. Their were groans from Edinburgh when Andrew came close with the next starter, identifying two 8 letter adjectives as paternal and neonatal. The second was right, but parental was needed for the first.

As we moved into the last third of the competition our own Rach Cherryade made her characteristic timely buzz to relieve pressure and take a vital starter, identifying the abbreviation for Middlesex as being equivalent for the roman numerals for 1001, 500, and 510 ( MIDDX) .A set of bonuses followed on chemical formulae. Andrew Matheson showed that LAM readers keep their nerve when he identified a quote about an ingenious collection of portable plumbing as referring to the human body. 2 bonuses were taken . so with 4 minutes to go every answer was crucial, as Manchester led by a mere 15 points. Tom Whyman buzzed in to correctly say that Mary Queen of Scots was executed at Fotheringhay. I was interested they were asked how many sides a threepenny piece had. I got that wrong in the rugby club a few months ago. What a man Jakob Whitfield was to keep his head, and get the next starter by answering that the speed of sound in a vacuum is nothing, because it can’t travel in a vacuum. Only a couple of minutes left, and Edinburgh needed to answer everything to pull back a 45 point deficit.They so nearly did. They pulled back to 165, Andrew Matheson buzzed in for an answer – and the gong went before he could say it.

Once again, Manchester and Edinburgh have taken me to the brink. Edinburgh, you played brilliantly, and I’m sorry I won’t be seeing you again. Rachel, Tom, Nick and Jakob, very well done. Beating the curse of the support from the Clark sofa is no mean feat ! Very good luck in the semis.


Jeremy Paxman Watch

He set out his stall early this week, with
“YOU MAY NOT CONFER !” to Manchester following Edinburgh’s unsuccessful early interruption. When Manchester failed to identify that the recipient of a forged letter in “Twelfth Night” was Malvolio, he replied “Oh Dear”, in the same tone that I guess he would use if his favourite aunt had just told him that he’d run over her cat.
When faced with a set of chemical formula bonuses he testily bullied Manchester – oh come on , we can’t wait here all night ! Hooray ! The Paxman is back in town. He followed up with a withering “Shall we come back to you after Newsnight ? “

Interesting Fact Of The Week That I Didn’t Already Know

Only 5 Commonwealth States lie entirely North of the Tropic of Cancer – and Pakistan is one of them. I guessed Canada, Malta , UK , Cyprus – but that one escaped me.

Only Connect

Apologies to one and all - due to computer problems I'm going to have to post this later.

Saturday, 27 February 2010

Answers to February Quiz

Here are the answers to the quiz that I posted last month.


1) In the news – who is Vanessa Perroncel ?
That French underwear model with John Terry, etc etc.

2) Which Asian capital city was designed by sir Edwin Lutyens ?
NEW Delhi

3) Christopher Trace and Leila Williams were the first presenters of which Tv show ?
BLUE Peter

4) Which Stanley Kubrick film has a title that means a type of bullet used by US Infantrymen ?
FULL Metal Jacket

5) Which is the smallest species of mouse native to the UK ?
HARVEST Mouse

6) What is the connection between you last four answers ?
MOON

7) The American War of Independence effectively ended with the defeat of General Cornwallis in which battle ?
Yorktown

8) Which two Shakespeare plays between them contain the words All and Nothing ?
Alls Well That Ends Well
Much Ado About Nothing

9) Who did Andy Murray defeat in the semi final of the recent Australian Open
Marin Cilic

10) What did Apple launch in January which they claim will revolutionise the way that we use the web ?
I- Pad

11) How is life prisoner Iliich Ramirez Sanchez better known ?
Carlos the JACKAL

12) Which roman letter stands for 500 in roman numerals ?
D

13) Which British car was produced between 1972 and 2002 as a successor to the Regal, and has now been superceded by the Rialto ?
Reliant ROBIN

14) What is the connection between your last three answers ?
DAY

15) What was the name of the singer who provided the singing voice for many film actresses in musicals, for example, Deborah Kerr in The King and I ?
Marnie Nixon

16) Which well known singer died of anorexia nervosa in 1983 ?
Karen Carpenter

17) Which is the only country in the world that begins with the letter O ?
Oman

18) Who scored the first try in this year’s 6 nations ?
Jamie Heaslip

19) Last week thousands of Toyota cars were recalled due to a potentially deadly fault with which component ?
Accelerator pedal ( that was the FIRST recall, anyway )

20) How is the AK47 Assault rifle otherwise known ?
KALASHNIKOV

21) Which is the largest temple in the world ?
ANGKOR WAT

22) The element copper is actually named after which island ?
CYPRUS

23) Which medal is the highest civil decoration in the UK ?
THE GEORGE CROSS

24) Which ragtime composition by Scott Joplin was the first ever instrumental piece to sell a million copies of sheet music ?
MAPLE LEAF Rag

25) Which British newspaper was launched in 1964 to replace the Daily Herald ?
THE SUN

26) How is the constellation otherwise called Crux commonly known ?
THE SOUTHERN CROSS

27) What is the connection between your last 7 answers ?
All appear on National flags – Kalashnikov –Mozambique, Angkor Wat – Cambodia , Cyprus – work it out for yourself, George Cross – Malta, Maple Leaf – Canada,The Sun – tons of flags, take your pick, I like the sun on Argentina and Uruguay’s flags, Southern Cross – both Australia and New Zealand

28) Mrs. Thatcher’s private papers, released last week, revealed that she followed which diet, named after a medical establishment ?
The Mayo Clinic Diet

29) Which famous scientist once said “I do not believe that God plays dice with the world ?
EINSTEIN

30) Which of the 8 planets was discovered in the 18th century by William Herschel ?
URANUS

31) In 1988, when Great Britain won the Olympic gold medal in Mens Hockey, which country did they defeat in the final ?
West GERMANY

32) In Roman Mythology, who was the God of the Underworld ?
PLUTO

33) What is the connection between your last four answers
ELEMENTS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE HAVE BEEN NAMED AFTER THEM

34) Which singer’s real name is Roger Nelson ?
Prince

35) In The Simpson’s, Homer works in the nuclear plant. What is he actually responsible for ?
Safety !

36) Who replaced John Terry as England Captain ?
RIO Ferdinand

37) Ian Brown was the lead singer of which 1990s Manchester band ?
The STONE Roses

38) What name was given to the court of law, in the palace of Westminster, which lasted until 1641 ? It took its name from the distinctive decoration on the roof of the room in which it sat ?
The Star CHAMBER

39) Which notorious Australian TV show was set in Wentworth Detention Centre ?
PRISONER Cell Block H

40) In computer terminology, which F blocks unauthorised access to a computer system or network ?
FIREwall

41) Which is the capital of the American state of Arizona ?
PHOENIX

42) What is the name of the alter ego of Wonder Woman ?
Diana PRINCE

43) The word Halloween is actually short for which 3 word phrase ?
All HALLOWS Eve

44) What is the connection between you last seven answers ?
As I’m sure you well know they are the 7 Harry Potter novles, linked in the order of publication.