Monday, 20 April 2026

Mastermind Grand Final 2026 (Spoilers)

Well, I’m just starting to come down from all the excitement of the double bubble of Quizzy Mondays Grand Final evening. My first thought is – thank goodness I didn’t try to predict that final! Well, we’ll say a bit more about that later. Meanwhile, on with the show.

Kicking off the final was Lorna Frankel. In both previous rounds Lorna had been rock solid on her specialist rounds and I expected her to be so again. She certainly did well, scoring 11. However, she did drop a couple of points, and her score was slightly lower than she had managed in her two previous specialists. No disaster at all, though and game on.

Ross Taylor was answering on the films of Danny Boyle. His solid 10 in the heat was trumped by his excellent 12 in the semi. Which was not actually the highest specialist score in that particular match. Ross’ upward trend continued as he whacked in a near perfect 13. I had no doubt that this would put Ross in the shakeup when we got into the business end of the competition.

There was a kind of symmetry about Danielle’s specialist round. She had scored 11 in the heat and 11 in the semi so we can’t claim it was a surprise when she also scored 11 in tonight’s round on Beatrix Potter. Yes, she was a couple of points behind, but if she could match her GK round from the heat then she would have a very competitive score.

David Ford started his round on Robert Burns extremely well. He’d scored 11 in the heat and he looked on course to at least repeat that. However a couple of stoppers in mid round seemed to put him off his stride a bit, but in the end he recovered to get into double figures with 10. 3 points behind the lead is not an unbridgeable gap, especially if he could produce a GK round like the one he’d had in the heats.

Miles Searle did point out in his filmed insert that if he won, then he would be the youngest ever winner, being a remarkable 21 years old. I don’t know if this makes him the youngest finalist since Susan Reynolds in 1974, but I wouldn’t be surprised. Oh, you know, I do sometimes wish that they wouldn’t ask contenders to talk about this sort of thing in their films for the start of the specialist rounds. I always think it’s tempting fate. I remember for my film for the 2008(7) SOBM Grand Final I was asked about my chances of winning, and I stonewalled it with ‘1 in 6, same as everyone else.’ Miles’ round of 8 points on Notre Dame Cathedral was a perfectly satisfactory one. But in the final, the banker only pays double figures.

Finally Diane Howe. Answering on Jim Lovell she scored a fine 12. This was on a par with the score from her the specialist round in her heat, and notably better than the 9 points she had scored in the semi final. At just one point behind in second she was handily placed on the leader’s shoulder at the canal turn.

For the record, I scored 5 on Jim Lovell, 4 on Julie Andrews, one each on Danny Boyle, Beatrix Potter and Robert Burns and precisely zero on Notre Dame.

First to return to the chair was Miles Searle. Miles had scored a brilliant 15 on GK in his semi and if he could repeat or improve upon this then it would certainly put the cat among the pigeons. Well, it didn’t quite work out that way this time and he finished with 17. But a Mastermind finalist at 21! All that he is missing from his armoury is a few good years at the quiz face and, should he desire, he could easily pass this way again.

David Ford, as with his specialist round, at first looked like he was on for a very fine performance. But a wrong answer in the middle of the round robbed him of all momentum. Oh, as we know any score in double figures in the modern era of Mastermind is a good one. But when you’re 3 points behind, 10 just isn’t going to be enough. Not in the Grand Final.

Now, I did mention in my preview that what you hope to do in the Grand Final is to find your very best form and pull out a better round than you managed in either heat or semi. In the heat and semi Lorna Frankel managed GK scores of 12 and 10. Tonight she got to 10 and kept answering. She got to 12 and kept answering. She got to 13 and finally ended the round with 14 and no passes. 25 and no passes overall. That could, just could, be a winning score, I thought.

Danielle Connolly’s best GK score so far of 13 in the heat would not quite be enough. Like Lorna before her she was going to have to improve on her best form in GK. Well, she gave it a good go. But before the white line of time started to run out it was clear she wasn’t going to get there. Nonetheless a good 10 for 21 gave her 2nd place with 2 contenders still to go.

The first of whom was Diane Howe. Diane’s best GK form from the heat, where she scored 14, was required to take the outright lead. She looked calm and was answering well. As the round went on there were perhaps just signs of fatigue as she closed in on the 13 and no passes that she needed for a share of the lead. It was close, but she got there. Also 25 and no passes.

Finally Ross Taylor. Alone of all the contenders, Ross returned to the chair knowing exactly what he needed to do. 12 points and no passes for a share of the lead and a three way tie break. 13 for an outright win. Make no doubt, Ross could do this. He’d produced the joint best GK round of the whole series in the semi, where he’d scored 15. Of all of the finalists he has played in the most high-powered and pressured quizzes. All he needed was for the questions to run for him. It was close, desperately so. However, Ross, in an attempt to maintain momentum I believe, passed during the round which meant that 12 would not be enough. As it was, he just fell a wee bit short. It happens. He finished with 24.

Which meant that we had a tie break, between Lorna and Diane. In one way it is a shame that one of these fine competitors would have to lose, but that’s Mastermind. Lorna was the first to answer the five questions in the tie break. I was fairly sure that she had two of them. Diane was brought back and she, I believed, answered 3 of them correctly. I was right. Diane, the self confessed adrenaline junkie, is our new Mastermind champion. Huge congratulations.

I offer my heartfelt commiserations to Lorna. And my thanks to all 6 finalists for a great hour’s entertainment. It was nice to see Clive paying a fulsome tribute to them and to all of the contenders, without whom we would not have a show. Thanks to the team who make the show too. Cheers Mastermind – I look forward to the next time we meet in the 2027 series.

The Details

Lorna Frankel

Julie Andrew

11

0

14

0

25

0

28

Ross Taylor

The Films of Danny Boyle

13

0

11

2

24

2

 

Danielle Connolly

Beatrix Potter

11

1

10

1

21

1

 

David Ford

Robert Burns

10

0

10

0

20

0

 

Miles Searle

Notre Dame Cathedral - Paris

8

0

9

0

17

0

 

Diane Howe

Jim Lovell

12

0

13

0

25

0

3

Sunday, 19 April 2026

Mastermind 2026 Grand Final Specialist SUbjects

Silly me.  All of that guff in the preview and I haven’t even mentioned the specialist subjects for tomorrow’s Grand Final. They are:-

Dame Julie Andrews,

The Films of Danny Boyle,

Beatrix Potter,

Robert Burns,

Notre-Dame Cathedral

Jim Lovell.

Actually, as a set I really rather like them. I mean, there’s none of them which I’d pick as an absolute banker, but with a bit of luck and a following wind I might be able to score a point or two on all of them. There’s none of them that seem to carry a government health warning with them. Yes, there’s over 800 years worth of history to consider for Notre Dame, but it can be done. There were over 1900 years of History for London Bridge in my final and like I said, it can be done. I always think biographical subjects are a good fit for Mastermind, having definite limits to what you can be asked, and we have four of them. Beatrix Potter might prove problematical as there’s all of the books, and all of the pictures and all of the life. I read a biography of her a couple of years ago and there is a lot to deal with. Likewise, Julie Andrews is 90, and her career started as a child star, so even if you just concentrated on her stage and screen career there is a hell of a lot to learn. Robbie Burns wrote over 500 poems, without even touching his life and career. Jim Lovell, well there’s all of his career as an astronaut which is pretty well documented but that only accounts for about 12 years of his life. He was 97 when he passed away last August. That’s a lot of non-astronaut years to learn about. Finally, the films of Danny Boyle. I believe he has thus far had 16 films released. Sounds manageable? Well, when you consider that film and TV rounds do tend to concentrate on the events of the film/TV show, that’s a lot of films to watch, make notes on and learn.

Well, however our six finalists do in the show, I hope that you’ll join me in thanking them for giving it a go. Whatever happens, take satisfaction that you are a Mastermind finalist and nobody can ever take it away from you.

University Challenge 2026 Grand Final Preview

 The Tale of the Tape

 

1st rd F

1st rd A

2nd rd F

2nd rd A

QF1

F

QF1

A

QF2

F

QF2

A

QF3

F

QF3

A

SF

F

SF

A

Edinburgh

200

105

180

150

195

80

105

85

/

/

155

110

Manchester

170

150

160

135

80

195

150

120

185

135

250

70

 

 

For - Average

Against - Average

Margin - Average

Edinburgh

167

106

61

Manchester

166

115

51

 

Well, before we think about my comparative performance tables, let’s consider the fact that these teams met in the first set of quarter finals. Back then, it wasn’t really close. Edinburgh won by 195-80.

So are we looking at a foregone conclusion in the final? No. I’ve read my review of that quarter final match, and everything comes back to the starters. It usually does. In that match Manchester skipper Kai Madgwick answered 5 starters correctly. Now compared with his 10 in the semi final that looks as if it’s famine rations, while actually it’s a good performance. But nobody else in the Manchester team managed to answer a starter correctly. In a match where the skipper was getting beaten on the buzzer more than usual it really needed another member of the team to help ease the pressure just a little. As it was Johnny Richards of Edinburgh scored 7 starters which was more than Manchester scored all evening.

Alright, then, now let’s look at the comparative performances. There is only a 1 point difference in the teams’ average scores. When you factor in that on average Edinburgh’s average points difference is +61, while Manchester’s is+51, and that is affected by the match between the teams, then this suggests that they are a lot closer than their quarter final match suggests. There was no other team that faced both of our finalists so we don’t have that to compare.

Bearing this in mind, we have to speculate on why the score wasn’t closer when the teams met in the quarters. Maybe Edinburgh are just that tad faster on the buzzer and we’ll see a similar result in the final. That’s certainly possible. But there are other possible explanations. Maybe that particular set of starters happened to be more closely aligned to Edinburgh’s knowledge than Manchester, though the sheer blind luck of the draw. Maybe Johnny Richards was having an especially good night while Kai Madgwick was having an off night. That’s possible.

I always like a team which has people who can answer a wide enough range of starters in up to three of their seats. Edinburgh look stronger to me on this score than Manchester look. Now I grant you that a player who can answer you 10 starters in an evening has the ability to carry you to a win if they are on song. However the other side of that particular coin is that you are reliant on them not having a bad night. Last week we saw one of this series’ finest buzzers, Oscar O’Flanagan, having such a night. It can happen.

Mind you, that was largely because Kai Madgwick and his team started the contest at such a tremendous pace and it meant that Oscar and Imperial were forced to gamble and come in a little bit too early. What might happen, I wonder, if Manchester manage to get off to a similar start against Edinburgh? By the end of the quarters Edinburgh were the only unbeaten team left in the series. How will they cope if they find themselves under real pressure for the first time in this series?

Twist my arm behind my back and I’ll say Edinburgh to win, but if Kai Madgwick has another blinder that prediction won’t matter a damn.

Can’t wait.

Mastermind 2026 Grand Final Preview

 The Tale of the Tape

Lorna Frankel

1st round

12

0

12

0

24

0

Lorna Frankel

semi

13

0

10

0

23

0

Average

 

12.5

0

11

0

23.5

0

Diane Howe

1st round

12

0

14

1

26

1

Diane Howe

semi

9

3

11

2

20

5

Average

 

10.5

1.5

12.5

1.5

23

3

Ross Taylor

1st round

10

0

9

0

19

0

Ross Taylor

semi

12

0

15

0

27

0

Average

 

11.5

0

12

0

23

0

Danielle Connolly

1st round

11

0

13

0

24

0

Danielle Connolly

semi

11

1

6

2

17

3

Average

 

11

0.5

9.5

1

20.5

1.5

David Ford

1st round

11

0

16

0

27

0

David Ford

semi

9

0

10

1

19

1

Average

 

10

0

13

0.5

23

1

Miles Searle

1st round

9

0

13

0

22

0

Miles Searle

semi

11

0

15

0

26

0

Average

 

10

0

14

0

24

0

 

Yes, peeps, the above table shows how our 6 finalists in tomorrow night’s Grand Final have performed in their semi-finals and their first-roundheats. Now, if you’re looking for a prediction, well, I’m afraid that I’ve stopped doing that. Yes, I know in my heart of hearts that me predicting a winner cannot logically really scupper that contender’s chances. But I’m sick of getting it wrong all the time.

It’s probably just as well that I’m not trying to pick a winner, anyway, because this year is too difficult to call. Just in case you haven’t noticed, I’ve averaged out the points from each contender’s two shows, and 5 of our contenders have an average points total of between 23 and 24. 5 contenders separated by 1 point. Now, okay, that is only the average. But that in itself raised the point that generally there is a lot of inconsistency between the finalists’ performances in their first round, and in their semi, especially when it comes to general knowledge. In all likelihood the winner will need to have been the top, or very close to the top performer in general knowledge. So even in the case of the finalist with the lowest GK score from the semis, who is to say that they won’t have a GK round that is even better than their first round GK? Even in the case of the finalist with the highest GK score from the semis, who is to say that they won’t have a performance that is on a par with their first round GK?

So even though it is always a case of the final is there to be won by the person who manages to find their very best form on the night, it seems to apply even more for tomorrow than it normally does. Alright, I haven’t picked an actual winner for years, but the winner is usually one of the contenders I’ve thought was in with a chance. It hasn’t been won by an outsider. Well, if I’m honest, there really are no real outsiders this year. If any of these contenders has their best evening of the series, and the others don’t, then there’s our winner.

It’s not the time or place to reiterate the points I made last week about how I’d like to resolve the situation that can happen when two of the strongest contenders in the whole series get matched in the same heat. All I want to do now is to congratulate each of our 6 finalists for getting this far. I hope that the final proved to be a memorable and enjoyable experience for all of you, and I’m really looking forward to it.