Well, another sleb show, and after this one the
production team must be worrying that they’ll be getting a knock on the door
from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Slebs. I’ll say more
about that later on.
The show often invites broadcasters from BBC
Radio, CBBC and CBeebies to take part, and first into the lists last night was Mary
Anne Hobbs. I wasn’t previously aware of her work, but a quick google revealed
her to be a BBC Radio 6 broadcaster. It also revealed that we were born in the
same year – and I have to say that she is, without wishing to appear ungallant,
wearing a hell of a lot better than I am. Mary Anne’s specialist subject was
the late great Barry Sheene. By jingo she knew her stuff as well. 9 points, and
only a stumble kept her away from the magical double figure barrier. A good
round.
Neil Fitzmaurice is one of those people whose
name you might not know, but whose face you probably recognize straightaway.
Well, anyone who had a hand in writing Phoenix Nights has my respect. Neil was
answering on the films of Robert De Niro, and that’s a hell of a wide subject
when you consider that he’s made getting on for 100 of them. All of which
probably goes some way towards explaining why Neil was unable to squeeze his
way past 6 points. Not by any means a score to be ashamed of, but there was a
rueful look on his face as he left the chair, and he surely thought that his
chance of taking home a piece of glassware had just disappeared.
Katie Thistleton was the seemingly obligatory
CBBC presenter in this particular show. Her subject was The Life and Times of
Rachel Green. If that name doesn’t mean anything to you, well, basically Rachel
Green was the character played by Jennifer Aniston in Friends. Now, I can
already hear the naysayers preparaing their green biros for this one. My 2007
heat of regular Mastermind was leapt upon as an example of the show’s so-called
dumbing down because Stacy Mitchell on the same heat chose the Life and Career
of Jennifer Aniston. Well, here we a contender not only taking Friends – but only
one of the main characters. All I can say is that things change for the Sleb
shows. Leeway has to be given with specialist subjects – with good reason too,
as we would see later. Having picked what I found to be the easiest of last
night’s specialists, at least Katie did justice to it, scoring 11.
Finishing the round was dear old Johnny Ball.
Johnny’s position in the pantheon of Children’s TV greats was secured with his
brilliant Think of a Number TV series, and its successors. Later on in the show
Johnny would reflect ruefully that nobody has come along to make such
programmes for children since. He’s probably right, but then who else could do
it? His specialist round was on Michael Faraday. He struggled manfully with it,
but a misfiring recall system didn’t help, and he levelled out with 6.
Neil Fitzmaurice, freed from the pressure of
being in a position where it was realistic that he might actually win the show,
gradually relaxed into his round. Picking up speed in the second minute he
managed to break through the double figure barrier to notch up a decent round
of 11, to finish on 16. Johnny Ball’s misfiring recall did him no more favours
in the GK than it had in the specialist round, and indeed he did confess to
being in panic mode. He fought his way to 5 points for 11.
Now for the cruelty to slebs. At the halfway
stage it really was a two horse race between Mary Anne and Katie, who were way
ahead of two gents. Mary Anne returned to the chair, and . . . well, there’s no
nice way of saying it. She got one right in her GK round. So now the worst that
Neil could come was 2nd. Katie returned to the chair, and she
actually did better than Mary Anne. She scored 2 points.
Look, at the end of the day I know little more
about how this has worked out than any other viewer. I don’t know whether Mary
Anne and Katie volunteered to go on the show – I don’t know whether they were
invited and agreed immediately and enthusiastically – I don’t know whether they
were invited and were a little reluctant but allowed themselves to be persuaded
because its for a good cause – I don’t know whether they were put under
pressure to appear by their BBC superiors. We don’t know, and we can’t know. I
don’t know whether both or either suffered dreadfully from brain freeze because
of the pressure of being in the chair, or whether they just don’t have a huge
amount in the way of general knowledge. So anything I say must be viewed in
that light. Still – IF pressure was put onto either or both to appear, it’s a
pretty sad thing. Yes, I know it’s only a bit of fun, but doing badly on Sleb
Mastermind, I would imagine, is still a lot worse than being first out on Sleb
Pointless, or being caught by the Chaser in a couple of steps on Sleb Chase, to
name but two. I really don’t know that it’s that entertaining watching a couple
of perfectly nice minor celebrities squirming and suffering their way through a
GK round which they maybe just aren’t suited to. Pah. Humbug.
The Details
Mary Anne Hobbs | Shelter | Barry Sheene | 9 - 1 | 1 - 7 | 10 - 8 |
Neil Fitzmaurice | Zoe’s Place | The Films of Robert De Niro | 5 - 7 | 11 - 2 | 16 - 9 |
Katie Thistleton | FOP Friends | The Life and Times of Rachel Green | 11 - 1 | 2 - 7 | 13 - 8 |
Johnny Ball | Action for Children | Michael Faraday | 6 - 4 | 5 - 7 | 11 – 11 |
5 comments:
Wise words as usual Dave. I'm reminded of something Paxo once said to a losing team on an edition of Xmas UC; he told them they hadn't been obliged to take part, and they were good sports for doing so, even though they had lost badly (IIRC, I can't remember for sure).
Seeing celebs struggle on quiz shows is one thing, but hopefully they will have had fun. If they've been talked in to doing it and weren't all that keen in the first place, that's a different story.
I mean, look at the Xmas UCs we've had so far: (SPOILER ALERT) both losing sides were utterly trounced, and were still smiling at the end of it. They were clearly there for fun and hadn't been talked into it.
Pointless always gives money to the charities of all celebs who participate; I would like to think Mastermind would do the same regardless of how well the celebs do.
Sorry, that was longer than I'd planned.
Hi Jack
That's the point - we just don't know. We have to take it on trust that all of those who took part were very happy to do so, and I do hope that they still managed to enjoy their experience. It's not the same as for the sake of argument being on Christmas UC - there you are a team, and if it doesn't work out, well hey, it's the team's fault, not one individual's.
Have a great Christmas, Jack
Oh, and I'm almost 100% certain that the fee for appearing on the show which would go to the slebs goes to their nominated charities.
Hi Dave, hope you and yours had a good Christmas! Couldn't help but notice that the subject of a single character from Friends is not without precedent.
For twas only in the last celebrity series that Jordan Stephens (of the group Rizzle Kicks) did "The Life and Times of Ross Gellar" from the same show.
I can't speak to the reaction then of course, and I wouldn't be totally surprised if we saw another of the characters used for a subject on next year's show.
Hi Adam
I forgot about that! Well, chances are that a significant number of the people who take part in sleb Mastermind aren't sitting around all day thinking about what they'd do as a specialist for the show, so I guess that the Beeb are quite helpful with the suggestions.
If it gets to the Life and Times of Gunther from Central Perk, mind, we have a problem.
Post a Comment