Another Mastermind Grand Final. Another healthy portion of egg all over my face. I’ll come to that in the fullness of time.
So, kicking off our final was Ben Spicer. In my preview I
had Ben as an outside chance of a podium place but more likely amongst the
minor placings. In tonight’s final Ben was answering on British and Irish Lions
Tours of the 21st century. After the drought of the last few semi
finals I rather fancied myself to do quite well on several of the specialists
tonight and this was one of them. Well, I did okay with 3. Ben did much better,
putting on 10 points. A competitive score, but not I fancied the highest that
we were going to see in this round.
I predicted that James Beeby would just miss out on the
podium, and cited the fact that his heat and semi final specialist rounds had
been good, but not outstanding. Well, that goes to show how much I know, for
the round that James put in tonight really was outstanding. I managed correct answers on his round on Princess
Margaret – well, I have watched every episode of the Crown after all – but James
managed an excellent 14. That was a round that was going to take some beating.
I predicted that Michael McPartland would become the
champion. This prediction was built on the solid foundation hat he had top
scored in all of the first round heats by four points, and then he had done the
same in all of the semi finals. Michael was answering on the Rocky Films. He
didn’t do badly. . . but crucially he didn’t do as well as he could. It must
have been crushing to him to have just his one under par round in the whole
series during the final. Michael scored 9, putting him five points behind with 3
contenders yet to play. I scored four on this round.
Stephen Finn I suggested might well be one of those contenders
who gets better and better as the series goes on. He certainly improved between
first round and semi. Tonight he was answering on Bletchey Park during World
War II, and he did well, scoring 12. At only two points behind he was still in
with a chance, especially if nobody beat James’ score of fourteen. This looked
as if it might be my dodgiest subject for the final and that’s exactly what it
proved to be as I scored just the one.
I suggested that James Davidson had already won his final
by getting this far, and that he would probably not have the firepower to make
a successful challenge at this point in his quiz career. Tonight he was
answering on the Emperor Augustus – this was my banker subject and indeed it
yielded me 6. James did well, but not well enough, ending with 9 like Michael
before him.
Bringing the round to a close was Stuart Field. Now,
despite the fact that he needed a tie break to win his heat, and a pass
countback to win his semi final I fancied Stuart’s chances enough in my review
to predict he would be runner up. Well, he certainly didn’t go through his
specialist round as if he was settling for second place. He faced fifteen
questions, and answered every one of them correctly. It was a brilliant
performance on the BBC sitcom Extras, and it was one of those rounds where you
felt that Clive could have carried on asking him questions for another two
minutes and he would still have had all of them right. 1 point on Extras gave
me an aggregate of 19 – not bad but then that was based on 6 rather than four
rounds.
First back to the chair then was Michael. I never expected
him to be first to go in the GK round tonight – and I can only apologise to him
for cursing him with the Clark tip. To my mind he was the best and most
consistent GK performer in this final line up. Could he score enough to win?
Well, all he could do was give it his absolute best and hope to hang on. He did
very well too. Once again he got into the mid-teens, scoring 15. I had the
sinking feeling that although this might well push him up onto the podium, I
couldn’t see it being quite enough.
So, I said in my preview that I didn’t think that James
Davidson would have the firepower to really challenge. Well, he might have only
scored 9 in the Specialist but he made up for that with what I thought was his
best GK round. No, he didn’t quite match Michael’s round, but he kept plugging
on to accrue a highly praiseworthy 13 points for a total of 22, 2 points behind
Michael.
Ben had put in a good specialist round, and yet still found
himself five points behind at half time. Not only that, but he was faced with
the daunting fact that the only way he could go into the lead was by scoring
16, since he had accrued a pass already. Well, he gave it a lash, and acquitted
himself well, scoring 12. On countback he was just behind James D because of
that 1 pass. So Michael was up to no worse than fourth.
Stephen Finn, well, how should I put it? He had one of ‘those’
rounds in his GK. Not a bad round, not a bad round at all, but that’s just not
enough when you need a great round. Stephen just couldn’t build up any momentum
and put together a string of correct answers. In the end he battled to add 9
and take his total to 20. So at least Michael was once again on the podium.
James Beeby had a massive five point lead over Michael at
half time. So he needed 10 points to go into the joint lead and 11 to go into
outright lead. What followed from him was a great example of calm under fire.
He did get a few wrong, but importantly he never let it bother him – or he
certainly seemed calm – and kept going. Having equalled Michael’s score he had
just one question left . . . and he got
it right! He was in the lead, with just one other contender to go. Well, I know
how that feels.
As had all the contenders in the final, Stuart had taken
his preparation extremely seriously and now here he was, on the brink of
achieving his goal. He was on fifteen. The target was 26 for an outright win.
12 points. Definitely within his capabilities, if the questions didn’t conspire
against him and if he kept his head. Well, he certainly did that. A picture of
concentration, Stuart passed the target with questions to spare and forged
onward putting daylight between himself and James B. In the end he won clearly
having added 13 to his total to win with 28.
Thank you all, gentlemen, for your efforts all series, and
for an exciting final. Thank you Clive Myrie. It’s only his second series, and
yet it’s difficult to envisage anyone else in the question master’s chair now.
But above all else, thank you, Stuart Field and congratulations on becoming the
Mastermind of the United Kingdom, 2023!
The Details
Ben Spicer |
British and Irish
Lions Tours of the 21st Century |
10 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
James Beeby |
Princess Margaret |
14 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
Michael McPartland |
The Rocky Films |
9 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
Stephen Finn |
Bletchley Park during
the Second World War |
12 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
20 |
3 |
James Davidson |
Augustus Caesar |
9 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
Stuart Field |
The BBC Sitcom Extras |
15 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
5 comments:
Clive is generally a very good host, but I think next year they definitely need to make the 'I've started so I'll finish' rule slicker because he handles it inconsistently. There were a few times this series I noticed (including in this final) that Clive started reading the last question after the buzzer had started. I did briefly consider whether the end of time is marked by the last note of the buzzer rather than the first, meaning this would be okay - so to test it I timed James Davidson's GK round, but it isn't; time ends on the first note. And that particular round, with James Davidson, ended just at the end of a question and had Clive handled it the same as he handled Stuart's SS round he'd have got in another question. I'm sure he's not doing it deliberately, but they need to be stricter with it because it's giving some contestants unfair advantages.
Do you think it was coincidence or an in-joke that one of the questions was the author of The Color Purple? The answer is Alice Walker - who of course shares her name with last year's winner!
Hi there.
I have enjoyed reading your commentary on this year's competition. You have been very fair and supportive. More power to your elbow.
Regards
Stephen Finn
(The one who had one of "those rounds" in the final ;-) )
Hi George. I see what you mean about the rule, but I don't think it made any difference to the outcome. There were a couple of close calls, certainly.
Hello Stephen!
Thank you so much for taking the time and trouble to leave a comment, and many congratulations on your achievements this season. Thanks very much for your kind comments about the reviews. I do call it as I see it, and always try to be fair and supportive. There's enough thoughtless an sometimes hurtful comments out there in t'internet from people who really don't understand what they're writing about.
Once again, very well done!
How nice to see Stephen commenting here. I thought he had some real stinkers in the GK round - of course that does happen from time to time: the luck of the draw.
Hi Peter, thanks for dropping by.
You do sometimes find that one of the finalists is given a round you wouldn't have fancied yourself. As you say, it's the luck of the draw.
Post a Comment