Good morning, dearly beloved. I’m just starting to emerge from my head cold which mucked me up last week, and so if I sound a bit curmudgeonly in this review I hope that you’ll accept my apologies. For the fact is that I found last night’s episode a bit of a slog. You know me, I love the show and I have empathy for all of the competitors, but for me last night’s show never caught fire.
Not that the specialists didn’t show endeavour and
knowledge, for the most part. The first of them, Jonathan Bartley’s round on
Richard Nixon certainly did. Jonathan had prepared thoroughly and this brought
him just desserts in the form of a double figure round of 10. I had 2 and
frankly that was all I was ever going to get on this set, but I know enough
about the subject to think that this was a testing set.
Matthew Patenall offered us the first of last night’s
subjects on which I would fail to score, Nirvana. Incidentally I saw a
newspaper feature the other day about the baby on the cover of Nevermind. He’s a
grandfather now (slight exaggeration). Matthew was well up to the size of the
challenge and his deep knowledge of the subject took him past Jonathan’s score
to set the target at 11.
Jane Kendrick offered us a subject I knew nothing about ,
the architect George Skipper. I’ve never listened to any of his albums either.
Normally I’m not bad on architecture, but my Skipper’s career had certainly
skipped past me. Jane did respectably well, but ah, in just not quite getting
an answer or two for not quite remembering them correctly she missed out on
double figures, scoring 8.
What have we said so often in the past about rounds on TV
series? They should come with a government health warning. In all honesty, you
had to feel for Savannah Phillips. I would imagine that you’d only opt to take
a TV show as a specialist subject because you absolutely love it, so then to
find out that you don’t know as much about it as you probably thought you did,
that’s tough. There’s no sugar coating this, Savannah scored 5.
Off the top of my head I’m not sure if 2 is my lowest
aggregate of the series on specialist so far – come to think of it I believe
there might have been a 1 in there somewhere. Still, that was behind me as we began
the GK. Savannah did a bit better with her GK questions, and scored 7 to end
with 12. All I can say, Savannah, is that you gave it a lash which few enough people have ever
done. Stuff the begrudgers.
Jane Kendrick sat down, composed herself, and delivered a
double figure round of 10. Normally ‘d say that 18 was never going to be enough
to win a heat, but, I don’t know, there seemed to be something in the air
during this particular heat and so at this stage I wasn’t ruling anything out.
Jonathan couldn’t beat it. He matched Savannah’s round, but
having incurred a pass in round 1 he needed to beat Jane’s total – he couldn’t
force a tie break, and in the end he just couldn’t summon up enough correct
answers to make his way through the corridor of doubt and emerge victorious the
other side.
Finally, then, Matthew Patenall. He would incur no passes,
just as Jane had done before him. So a tie break was certainly a possibility,
and with only a couple of questions to go that seemed to be where we were
heading. Matthew managed an 8th correct answer to take him to a
winning score of 19, though. Well done.
So, as I said, this wasn’t the greatest heat we’ve seen all
series. It didn't blow my socks off but then it wasn’t totally without interest. And what you have to
acknowledge is that I think that for all the contestants, in a first round heat
you’re honestly not thinking about the Grand Final and the glass bowl. You’re
thinking about doing your best and, if possible, winning the heat. End of. And
that’s exactly what Matthew managed to do. Well done! Best of luck in the
semis.
The Details
Jonathan Bartley |
Richard Nixon |
10 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
17 |
2 |
Matthew Patenall |
Nirvana |
11 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
Jane Kendrick |
The Architect George
Skipper |
8 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
Savannah Phillips |
Derry Girls |
5 |
1 |
7 |
2 |
12 |
3 |
No comments:
Post a Comment