The Tale of the Tape
Ruth Hart |
12 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
|
Caryn Ellis |
10 |
0 |
11 |
4 |
21 |
4 |
- |
Tom Moody |
13 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
20 |
2 |
- |
Tom Flowerdew |
9 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
- |
So let’s start with Tom Flowerdew. Tom was the lowest scorer
on my unofficial table of heat winners. Is that significant? Well, not
necessarily, no. It’s a clean slate in the semis. The real question is – can you
improve on your performance from the heats? The second real question is – can you
improve enough to earn yourself a place in the final? Tom was answering on
bears. Now, had I made a prediction about this match I’m not sure I would have
made this my banker subject. However, I should have done since I managed five
of these. Tom certainly achieved the objective of improving on his heat performance,
scoring a double figure round with 10.
Second contender Ruth Hart had the best performance of all
four heat winners in her first round match. She came in 3rd on my
unofficial table with an excellent 26 and if you didn’t know any better you’d
have been forgive for thinking that, with all three fellow contenders in the
bottom half of the table, that this match was hers to lose. It doesn’t necessarily
work like that in a semi-final, though. Answering on the Novels of Dame Muriel
Spark, a subject on which I was amazed to score 1.
Our third contender and second Tom of the evening, Tom
Moody, weighed in at number 20 on my unofficial table. However, he had scored an
excellent 13 on specialist back then, and if he could repeat this it would give
him a useful advantage over our first two contenders. On Monday night Tom was
answering on the ICC Cricket World Cup. I was a little uncertain about this – I
felt I might do okay on world cups up until the 90s. In fact this is exactly
how it worked out, and I added four to my aggregate to take me to double
figures. Tom, like Ruth and Tom F before him scored 10, but he incurred a
single pass.
Our final contender Caryn Ellis came in at number 17 on my
heat winners’ list. She’d scored a good 10 on specialist in the heats, but the
rounds we’d seen so far round had already show that this was the least that was
going to be needed in this semi. On Monday night Caryn answered on William
Harvey and the Discovery of the Circulation of Blood. I haven’t checked, but
this could well be the longest specialist subject title of the series so far. I
took a couple to take me 12, a pretty decent aggregate, but Caryn scored 9 and
1 pass.
You know, I do like a match when all four contenders have
prepared their subjects so well that they are all still in with a very
realistic chance of winning at the turn around. All four contenders were separated
by one point and one pass. That’s close. Usually at least one contender is out
of it by half time.
Back to the chair for Caryn, then. She’d scored double
figures in the heats with 11, and being realistic she would need all of that to
have a good chance of keeping the lead until hometime. She got it, too. That was certainly going to
put the other three into the corridor of doubt, although in such a tight match
the three passes she had accrued during her round were looking dangerous to her
prospects.
Well, Tom Flowerdew, the next to go, also passed three
times. In the heats he had scored 8 on GK, and he actually improved on this. Sadly
for him though, the 9 that he scored left him a point behind on 19. Look,
winning your heat, then improving on your performance in the semi final, that’s
got to be a cause of some satisfaction.
Ruth Hart had scored an excellent 14 on GK in her heat. She
didn’t need to improve on this, or even equal it to take the lead. 10 and no
more than 3 passes would see her take the lead with one contender to go. Well,
she scored the 10 points she needed while she passed . . . twice. Some way down
on her best, but good enough to take the lead. Could Tom Moody take it from
her?
Well, he could, but it would need him to make a significant
improvement on his GK round in the heats, where he scored 7. He certainly
tried. You could see his frustration every time he gave an incorrect answer. He
kept his momentum going with a few quick passes, but the line was approaching
more quickly than his total was growing and in the end he fell just short with
19.
Well played everyone. Nobody need feel the least
disappointment, although it’s only natural to want to win and to be disappointed
if you don’t. Well done especially to Ruth, and good luck in the Grand Final –
which is on Monday! Yay.
Tom Flowerdew |
Bears |
10 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
19 |
3 |
Ruth Hart |
The novels of Dame
Muriel Spark |
10 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
20 |
2 |
Tom Moody |
The ICC Cricket World
Cup |
10 |
1 |
9 |
4 |
19 |
5 |
Caryn Ellis |
William Harvey and the Discovery of the Circulation of Blood |
9 |
1 |
11 |
3 |
20 |
4 |
No comments:
Post a Comment