The Tale of the Tape
Name |
Specialist Score |
Specialist Passes |
GK Score |
GK Passes |
Total Score |
Total Passes |
Tie break |
Peter Wilson |
12 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
- |
Paul Judge |
10 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
- |
Helen Lippell |
12 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
4 |
Ben Jones |
8 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
- |
We’re getting close now, early beloved. One more semi-final
and then it will be Grand Final time.
Kicking off last night’s contest was Helen Lippell. Helen
was in the bottom half of my unofficial heat winners’ table. According to my
records Helen also took part in the first round heats in both 2016 and 2019,
narrowly failing to progress on both occasions. In her heat she answered very
well on Grinling ‘Funky’ Gibbons. Last night she needed an equally good
specialist round on British Prime Ministers of the 18th century. She
very early got it too, with a fine round of 11 points. Me? Well, I had my best
specialist round of the night with four.
Second up was Paul Judge. He’d scored 1 more point in the
heats than had Helen, achieved largely through a very good GK round. In his first
round Paul had scored 10 points on the Life and Career of Magic Johnson. Last
night he was answering on The Stranglers from 1974 – 1990. With such a
relatively short time period it was a given that Paul was going to be asked
some questions requiring real in-depth knowledge. For the most part he was
equal to the task, scoring a good round of 10 to put him just the one point
behind Helen.
Ben Jones had scored 1 point fewer than Helen in the heats.
He’d had 8 on F. Scott Fitzgerald. 8 is a very respectable score, but while it
might be enough in some heats it is unlikely to bring you a win in the semi-final,
especially one in which the other contenders have prepared their own
specialists so well. Ben, sadly, did not manage to improve on his specialist
score from the heats. Answering on the America poet Elisabeth Bishop he scored 7.
It is only in the rarest circumstances you’d see a four point lead overhauled
in a semi final GK round and there was still one contender to go.
Peter Wilson came in at number 2 on my unofficial table.
Last week we saw stand in Thomas Nelson comfortably win a semi final he did not
expect to take part in because he had lost in the first round heats. Well,
Peter was the contender who beat him, through a magnificent GK round of 15
points. Peter had scored 12 on the spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone. Last
night, answering on Oscar Winning Feature Films he repeated that feat to take
the lead. Incidentally I was pleased to see Clive clarify that the subject was
about winners of the Oscar for best animated feature film and not on animated
feature films that won any Oscar. For the record I scored four on Helen’s
round. 2 on the Stranglers, nowt on Elizabeth Bishop and 2 on the films for an
aggregate of 8.
So to General Knowledge. Ben’s GK round was very reminiscent
of his GK round in his heat. He started off at a blistering pace, snapping out
the answers and building considerable momentum. It he’d maintained this then he
might possibly have got into the mid teens. However as had happened in his heat
he had a couple wrong mid-round and seemed to start doubting himself a little
more. Don’t get me wrong, he scored 11 and in a semi-final 11 is pretty good
going. But having started five behind the lead, it surely wasn’t going to be
enough.
Paul Judge, on the other hand, was only two points off the
lead on 10. In his heat he’d score 12 points and if he could do so again then
he would be giving himself a shout. To cut a long story short, this was what he
did. 12 points gave him a total of 22, and a chance of clinging on at the top
until the end of the show.
Let’s put Helen Lippell’s task into perspective. In order
to go into the outright lead Helen would need to score 12. That would mean
equalling her best ever GK round on Mastermind. At first she did sound rather
unsure of some of the answers she was giving, but as more and more of them hit
home she kept on dredging them up, until by the end of the round she had posted
her highest ever GK round of 13. It was the kind of round that made me recall
my own semi final all those years ago, when I said to myself to just keep
answering and not worry about any I got wrong.
Which is not to say that Helen was anything like home and
dry at this point. Peter Wilson, let us remember, had scored 15 on GK in the
heats. He only needed 13 to win outright. Well, there’s no ‘only’ about 13 on
GK in the semis. Peter did not get the kind of ride in this round that he had
in the heats, and once he got a couple wrong it seemed to play on his mind,
There’s nothing to be ashamed about in a score of 8, which is what Peter scored
but he will know that he’s better than that score suggests.
I have to say though that it is nice to see persistence
rewarded. It must take a certain amount of determination to come back for a
third attempt at the show, and so to see Helen not just make her first semi-final,
but also her first grand final is great. Best of luck.
The Details
Helen Lippell |
British Prime Ministers
of the 18th century |
11 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
Paul Judge |
The Stranglers 1974 -
1990 |
10 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
Ben Jones |
Elizabeth Bishop |
7 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
Peter Wilson |
Oscar Wining Feature
Films |
12 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1 comment:
Slight error here: It was Thomas who answered on the Spaghetti Western films in the first round. Peter answered on Roger Federer.
(Sorry for my absence over the last month, by the way - busy busy!)
Post a Comment