Sunday 6 March 2022

Mastermind 2022 - Belated First Round Review

Better late than never. After last weekend’s hectic returning from Poland and then getting ready to go back to school after half term, I’ve finally had time to compile the list of Mastermind 2022 Heat Winners. Here it is:-

Name

Subject

SS

P

GK

P

Total

P

Winning Margin

Rank

Anthony Fish

Alfred Hitchcock films of the 1950s

14

0

16

0

30

0

8

1

Sarah Trevarthen

Rocky Horror

13

0

15

0

28

0

7

2

Patrick Buckingham

Francis I of France

13

0

14

0

27

0

1

3

Helen Garner

The Films of Tom Cruise

13

1

14

1

27

1

7

4

Alice Walker

Rodgers and Hammerstein Musicals

11

0

15

0

26

0

1

5

Lucy Westall

The Films of Pedro Almodovar

13

0

12

0

25

0

6

=6

Richard Aubrey

Yes Minister/Yes Prime Minister

13

0

12

0

25

0

1

=6

Dom Walker

The Life and Works of John Clare

12

0

12

0

24

0

3

=8

Patrick Wilson

JRR Tolkien’s Middle Earth

11

0

13

0

24

0

5

=8

Ian Wang

The Music of Beyonce

12

0

12

0

24

0

2

=8

Rachael Neiman-Wiseman

Kate Bush

11

0

12

0

23

0

3

=11

Will Vince

Joseph Rowntree

12

0

11

0

23

0

0

=11

Martin McCann

La Vuelta a España

10

0

12

0

22

0

0

=13

Gary McKenzie

Harold Larwood

10

0

12

0

22

0

4

=13

Tom Lea

Line of Duty

12

0

10

1

22

1

4

14

Allister Mallon

James Craig, Viscount Craigavon

13

0

9

2

22

2

1

=15

Ro Duns

The Alnwick Garden

10

0

12

1

22

2

4

=15

Kit Lane

Nell Gwyn

12

0

9

0

21

0

3

=17

Eleanor Ayres

Catherine de Medici

9

0

12

0

21

0

1

=17

Graeme Jackson

Grace Kelly

12

0

9

2

21

2

1

18

Marianne McKillop

Buffy The Vampire Slayer

10

0

10

0

20

0

1

=19

Ranvir Singh Kalare

Bruce Springsteen

9

0

11

0

20

0

2

=19

Paul Risebury-Crisp

Björk

10

1

9

0

19

0

2

21

Ashleigh Evans

The Music of Madonna

11

0

7

2

18

2

2

22

If there are any mistakes in the table – and I’m very capable of making mistakes – then they are unintentional and I do apologise. My ranking is just based on two measures – firstly the total score, and when these have been the same then the number of passes has been taken into account, just as it is on the show itself. Just out of interest I’ve also recorded the winning margin of each contender as well.

So predicting the final line up should be easy, shouldn’t it? Take the top six from my list. Well, no, I’m afraid it doesn’t work like that. Firstly, it all depends on the line up for each of the semi-finals. What criteria the current production team use to work out the line ups of each semi-final I can’t say for certain. In the past though, their chief concern was to get what they believed to be would be the best, most interesting combinations of specialist subjects – any kind of ranking or seeding based on first round performance didn’t come into it.

Secondly, the margins between a lot of the contenders are pretty narrow. If we take the semi final that we saw last Monday, on my ranking Lucy Westall was joint 6th, while Ian Wang was joint 8th. Yet there was only one point to choose between them in their first round performances, and only one point to choose between them in the semi – but this time it was Ian who was the point to the good.

We know for a fact that one of these people will be the overall winner. It’s difficult to predict just which one will be the winner, though. It’s a fact that the highest scorer in the first round isn’t always the person who goes on to win the whole series. Whoever wins will have to be able to get a very good score in general knowledge. Bearing this in mind, you’d be  looking at Anthony, Sarah, Patrick, Helen and Alice. But then, who’s to say that one of the contenders who scored 12 didn’t have a bit of an off day? Maybe one of them will have a monster score in their semi and go into the final as favourite. Which all points to the old adage – if you knew who was going to win, there’s be no point in playing.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Shouldn't there be 24 people in this list? 6 semi-finals with 4 in each?

Londinius said...

Oops - I'll have a look at this again when I get the chance

Stephen Follows said...

All 24 people are there, but the numbering down the side is wrong. It should go: 13, 13, 15, 16, 16, 18, 18, 20, 21, 21, 23, 24.