First Round Heats
Martin
McCann |
La Vuelta
a España |
10 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
Sarah
Trevarthen |
Rocky
Horror |
13 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
Dom Walker |
The Life
and Works of John Clare |
12 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
Rachael
Neiman-Wiseman |
Kate Bush |
11 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
Well, dearly beloved, last
week we saw the highest scoring contender from the heats, Anthony Fish, duly
book his place in the final with a fair degree of comfort, it must be
acknowledged. Last night saw the second highest scorer from the heats, Sarah
Trevarthen, try to emulate his performance. Standing in her way were three
contenders whose performances in the first round heats were separated by a mere
2 points. On paper, this looked cut and dried.
Of course, it wasn’t. Last
week Anthony’s task was made easier by his three fellow contenders not being
able to whack in the kind of performances in specialist that would at least
give them a reasonable chance. Kicking off last night with Irish Involvement in
the Spanish Civil War, Martin McCann whacked in an 11-point round –
incidentally a point more than he managed on specialist in his heat. Judging by
the previous semis this series, a perfect performance would only net you 14 or
at most 15 points. This suggested that barring something exceptional, Martin
would be in contention at the turnaround.
Sarah too matched her
specialist performance from the heats. Back then she was answering on Rocky
Horror, whereas last night she answered on Pulp. Both times she scored 13. I
like Pulp, but it turns out I know next to nothing about them, as I failed to
score any points on her rounds. Even on Martin’s round I scored a point –
Guernica, since you’re asking. As I’ve said, 13 is very close to optimal
performance. However, the fact that Sarah was only 2 points ahead of Martin
kept the interest going in the heat.
For the third round in a row,
the contender – Dom Walker in this case - repeated his specialist performance
from the first round. Then he scored 12 on the poet John Clare. Last night he
repeated that score on my favourite round of the night, Brian Clough. 8 points
took me to the brink of double figures, and you can trust me, that doesn’t mean
that Dom got an ‘easy’ round, because he didn’t. If you put the hard work into
your preparation, then that’s what makes a round look easy.
Last to go was our very own
Rachael Neiman-Wiseman. Look, I won’t lie about it. I always try to give every
contender a fair crack of the whip, and most of the time I’m non-partisan.
Well, I’m sorry, but last night it was a case of stuff that for a game of soldiers.
Rachael has been this way before, and I was crossing everything that she’d be
able to make it all the way this time. Well, Rachael was the only one of last
night’s contenders to improve on her first-round heat specialist score. Back
then she scored 11 on Kate Bush. Last night Rachael scored 12 on my second
favourite subject of the night, The Harry Potter novels. Incidentally this
subject is one that more people put on their applications forms than almost any
other – the same is true of Fawlty Towers and Father Ted. Every few series they
let someone take it – in this series Rachael got the nod. So, not in the lead
at half time, but poised just one point behind, right on the leader’s shoulder.
All contenders were still very
much in with a chance with only two points separating all of them after the
specialist rounds. Martin returned to the chair, and delivered a battling 11
points. This was just one point down from his performance in the heats.
However, without wishing to disparage anyone, the opposition in the semis is
tougher than the opposition he faced in the first round. 22, I reckoned, was
highly respectable, but surely at least one of these players would beat the
score.
Dom Walker certainly gave an
air of confidence as he answered the questions in his round without passing. He
did well and scored 11, but I couldn’t help feeling that he’d left the door
ajar for both Rachael and Sarah.
Rachael returned next. We’ve
seen in her previous appearances and appearances on other shows that the target
of 13 for an outright lead is within her capabilities. And at the start, she seemed
very much on target for this. Oh, but come the 5th or 6th question
and she faltered. I thought things were not quite right when she asked for a
repeat and had to endure some wobbles after that until she regained composure
and momentum in the second half of the round. Vital time had been lost, and
sadly she only managed to score 10, and agonisingly fell a point short of the
target.
So to Sarah Trevarthen. She’s
looked a potential champion in her GK round in the heats, scoring 15. She didn’t
manage quite such an outstanding round this time round. Too many of the
questions seemed to be going begging, but the finishing line was coming closer,
and, with the last question on Yeats’ Lake Isle of Innisfree, she clamed the 10th
point she needed to take her to 23. Her reward? Well, since both she and Dom
had scored 23 and no passes this meant a tie break. The result – well, Sarah
won the tie break, 4 – 2.
Very hard lines to Dom. You can’t
get much closer to a semi final place than that, sir. But congratulations to
Sarah, who kept her head well in the tie break to find the answers that she
needed. Only one semi final left now, and the Grand Final will soon be upon us.
The Details
Martin McCann |
Irish Involvement in
the Spanish Civil War |
11 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
|
Sarah Trevarthen |
Pulp |
13 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
4 |
Dom Walker |
Brian Clough |
12 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
2 |
Rachael Neiman-Wiseman |
The Harry Potter
Novels |
12 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
|
1 comment:
Here's something I've wondered: in the tie-breaks, are they still keeping a count of passes? Say someone passes on a question (which they'd be mad to do as it's not against the clock, but say it happens) and they score the same in the tie-break as the other player, would the other player win off that?
Post a Comment