Let’s start with a look at how last night’s contenders did
in their heats, shall we, dearly beloved?
Helen
Garner |
The Films
of Tom Cruise |
13 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
Tom Lea |
Line of
Duty |
12 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
22 |
1 |
Allister
Mallon |
James
Craig, Viscount Craigavon |
13 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
22 |
2 |
Eleanor
Ayres |
Catherine
de Medici |
9 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
Now, on paper, this looked as if it should be a clear win
for Helen Garner. As we all know, we don’t play Mastermind on paper. There was nothing
much to choose between Tom, Allister and Eleanor’s final scores, but possibly
the most significant factor was to look at the GK scores. It’s a hell of a lot
easier to improve your specialist performance between heat and semi than it is
to improve your GK, which suggested that if there was going to be a dark horse,
then this was more likely to be Eleanor than the gents.
Helen had given us the films of Tom Cruise, with which she
scored a fine 13 in the first round. Last night she gave us the X Files. I was
grateful for that for it brought me a few points. She did well, but did miss a
couple, and the difference between an 11 in a semi final specialist round, and
13, is the difference between a competitive score, and a commanding score.
Well, you’re not out of it with 11 at the halfway stage, that’s for sure.
Second up was Eleanor. Again, she offered a subject that
offered a couple of points, in the shape of York Minster. I’ve loved the
building ever since I badgered my parents into taking us to visit the National
Railway Museum in 1977. Once we finished in the museum, we took a long walk
around York, and I fell in love with the place in general, and York Minster in
particular. Not that I know a massive amount about the history of the Minster.
Eleanor did, though. She matched Helen’s score of 11, although she did incur
one pass along the way.
Tom Lea gave us the specialist round of the evening on
England at the Cricket World Cup since 2003. I’ll leave it to other
commentators to voice opinions about the relatively narrow scope of the subject.
It was a terrific round, and Tom really had to know his subject inside out to
cope with what appeared – from my limited knowledge – to be a very testing set
of questions. A score of 14 gave him a three point lead with just one contender
still to go.
That contender was Allister Mallon. Allister was offering
my favourite subject of the evening, the building of the Brooklyn Bridge. I don’t
know if any other readers remember a TV series from quite a few years back
called something like 7 Wonders of the Industrial Age. Different episodes focused
on The Bell Rock Lighthouse and the Great Eastern and one of them focused on
the Brooklyn Bridge, and very good it was too. I’ve always been interested in
it ever since. Allister knew more than I did, and he answered well. Crucially,
though, he didn’t answer very quickly, which meant that he levelled out at 8. 6
points off the lead, essentially his chances of the win were over.
Allister was the first to go in the GK round. His 9 was
perfectly respectable, but it wasn’t going to offer him much of a chance to
move up the table. Not in this sort of company, I’m afraid. The pre-race
favourite, Helen returned to the chair next. Now, if all three of the
contenders repeated their heat scores in GK, then Helen would beat Tom by 1
point, and Eleanor by 2 points. Helen did not manage to repeat her 14 scored in
the heats. Oh, she did fine, scoring 12, but she missed out on several things I
might have expected her to get based on the round she put in during the heats. Whether
this was due to nerves, or to a set of questions that didn’t quite suit as well
as the questions in the heat, only Helen could say for certain. But it meant
that the door was open.
Right. Let us talk about Eleanor’s round. I have not stood
up and applauded the telly since Jonathan Gibson in the final last year. I did
last night. Eleanor produced a GK round right out of the top drawer. 17 is
comfortably the highest score we’ve seen in GK this series, and Eleanor didn’t
score this because she had a rogue easy set of questions. They weren’t. As a
round it was every bit as testing as all the other rounds we’ve seen so far. It
was all the more remarkable considering that it was so much better than her
round in the heat. With the quality of answers that Eleanor gave, you’d be
forgiven for thinking that she is a regular, serious quizzer. Honestly, the
round was that good. If this round is typical of what we might expect from her
in the final, then she is a very, very serious contender indeed.
Which pretty much gives the game away that Tom Lea did not
manage the 14 and no passes he needed to win on pass countback. Again, he provided
a perfectly respectable round of 10, but after the pyrotechnics of Eleanor’s
round you’d have to say that anything less was always going to be a bit of an
anti-climax.
Well played to Helen, Tom and Allister. You are all of you
worthy semi-finalists, and that in itself is something. But Eleanor goes
forward, with a GK score to put the fear of God into any of the opposition in
the final.
Helen Garner |
The X Files |
11 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
Eleanor Ayres |
The History of York
Minster |
11 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
28 |
1 |
Tom Lea |
England at the
Cricket World Cup 2003 - present |
14 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Allister Mallon |
The Building of the
Brooklyn Bridge |
8 |
0 |
9 |
4 |
17 |
4 |
2 comments:
Eleanor's GK round was undeniably impressive. Looking forward, the key question is whether she can maintain this GK standard in the final whilst simultaneously improving her SS total to something in the teens. That is certainly a tough ask in the pressure cooker environment of the final but I suspect it will be necessary if she is to win. The sceptic in me wonders if she had a purple patch in the GK round in which the questions fell perfectly, something that is unlikely to happen more than once. Only time will tell and I wish Eleanor the best of luck in the final.
It is worth noting that Tom managed 15 SS questions, securing 14 points in what was a stunningly good performance. That's more SS questions than anyone else and I think it's another example of Clive Myrie quickening his reading pace in response to a punchy contestant. I do have my reservations about whether this is entirely fair to the other contestants.
Hi,
It is a question which you can't help wondering, isn't it - did Eleanor underperform in the heats in her GK - which was fine but not in the same league as her performance in the semi - or did she overperform in the semi. It really was a great round. Time will tell.
As regards Clive quickening his reading pace, well, Magnus Magnusson, in "I've Started So I'll Finish", did say that he found himself doing this on a couple of occasions when he had particularly quick answering contenders who were getting most of them right. I don't think it's a pre planned or even necessarily a conscious thing.
Post a Comment