The Tale of the Tape
|
|
1st rd F |
1st rd A |
2nd rd F |
2nd rd A |
QF1 F |
QF1 A |
QF2 F |
QF2 A |
QF3 F |
QF3 A |
SF F |
SF A |
|
Edinburgh |
200 |
105 |
180 |
150 |
195 |
80 |
105 |
85 |
/ |
/ |
155 |
110 |
|
Manchester |
170 |
150 |
160 |
135 |
80 |
195 |
150 |
120 |
185 |
135 |
250 |
70 |
|
|
For - Average |
Against - Average |
Margin - Average |
|
Edinburgh |
167 |
106 |
61 |
|
Manchester |
166 |
115 |
51 |
Well, before we think about my comparative performance tables,
let’s consider the fact that these teams met in the first set of quarter
finals. Back then, it wasn’t really close. Edinburgh won by 195-80.
So are we looking at a foregone conclusion in the final? No.
I’ve read my review of that quarter final match, and everything comes back to
the starters. It usually does. In that match Manchester skipper Kai Madgwick answered 5 starters correctly.
Now compared with his 10 in the semi final that looks as if it’s famine
rations, while actually it’s a good performance. But nobody else in the
Manchester team managed to answer a starter correctly. In a match where the
skipper was getting beaten on the buzzer more than usual it really needed
another member of the team to help ease the pressure just a little. As it was
Johnny Richards of Edinburgh scored 7 starters which was more than Manchester
scored all evening.
Alright, then, now let’s look at the comparative
performances. There is only a 1 point difference in the teams’ average scores. When
you factor in that on average Edinburgh’s average points difference is +61,
while Manchester’s is+51, and that is affected by the match between the teams,
then this suggests that they are a lot closer than their quarter final match
suggests. There was no other team that faced both of our finalists so we don’t
have that to compare.
Bearing this in mind, we have to speculate on why the score
wasn’t closer when the teams met in the quarters. Maybe Edinburgh are just that
tad faster on the buzzer and we’ll see a similar result in the final. That’s
certainly possible. But there are other possible explanations. Maybe that
particular set of starters happened to be more closely aligned to Edinburgh’s
knowledge than Manchester, though the sheer blind luck of the draw. Maybe
Johnny Richards was having an especially good night while Kai Madgwick was
having an off night. That’s possible.
I always like a team which has people who can answer a wide
enough range of starters in up to three of their seats. Edinburgh look stronger
to me on this score than Manchester look. Now I grant you that a player who can
answer you 10 starters in an evening has the ability to carry you to a win if
they are on song. However the other side of that particular coin is that you
are reliant on them not having a bad night. Last week we saw one of this series’
finest buzzers, Oscar O’Flanagan, having such a night. It can happen.
Mind you, that was largely because Kai Madgwick and his
team started the contest at such a tremendous pace and it meant that Oscar and Imperial
were forced to gamble and come in a little bit too early. What might happen, I
wonder, if Manchester manage to get off to a similar start against Edinburgh?
By the end of the quarters Edinburgh were the only unbeaten team left in the
series. How will they cope if they find themselves under real pressure for the
first time in this series?
Twist my arm behind my back and I’ll say Edinburgh to win,
but if Kai Madgwick has another blinder that prediction won’t matter a damn.
Can’t wait.
No comments:
Post a Comment