So at last we’ve reached the semi
finals, dearly beloved. While acknowledging that first round form is not an
infallible guide, it’s still quite fun to look over the form book before we get
into the show. Here’s the first round performances of our first semi
finalists:-
Nicholas Young
|
John Buchan
|
14
|
0
|
12
|
4
|
26
|
4
|
Sue Duffy
|
The Life and Works of Elizabeth Taylor
|
14
|
0
|
13
|
2
|
27
|
2
|
Roy
Smith
|
Bob Marley
|
12
|
1
|
14
|
2
|
26
|
3
|
Mark Grant
|
Keith Douglas
|
14
|
0
|
15
|
0
|
29
|
0
|
Brian Davis
|
The Life of
Henry VII
|
12
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
29
|
0
|
No
duffers in there. You’d think that the form guide suggested Mark and Brian were
the ones to beat, but there really wasn’t a lot to choose between all five,
bearing in mind that Nicholas’s GK was the lowest.
Nicholas it was who kicked us off. You may
recall that Nicholas took part in heat 15, and when he returned to the black
chair he only needed 5 points to win. Then he was answering on John Buchan,
while last night he gave us the Life and Times of Samuel Johnson. 11 in a semi
final specialist is a good, competitive total, and that’s what he produced. My
score of 6 off a rather basic knowledge of Doctor Johnson suggested that this
wasn’t necessarily a rock hard set of questions.
Next to go was Sue Duffy. Answering on Elizabeth
Taylor, Sue had won heat 4, with a sterling performance on specialist giving
her a lead which she maintained in the GK round. Last night she was answering
on Anthony Powell’s 12 novel A Dance to the Music of Time series. Never having
read any of them I can’t vouch for their difficulty, but I can vouch for the
fact that 11 points and no passes is a very competitive score.
Roy Smith was actually 3rd in Heat
One back in October. That was a contest in which the two contenders who beat
him both scored 16 on GK. Roy’s 14 wasn’t bad either. Back then he was answering
on perennial favourite Bob Marley. Last night he was answering on Two Tone
records. Yes, I was around in the late 70s and early 80s and remember them
well. Not well enough to score more than 3 points, mind you. Roy did better
than that. However at the end of the round he’d scored 7, and in a semi final,
I’m sorry, 4 points behind is almost like half a lap in a 10,000m race. It was quite
touching, really, as disappointment came over Roy’s face, and he was still
sitting in the chair a little forlornly as the lights dimmed.
Many people have made Mark Grant, our next
contender, a favourite for the series. This is totally understandable. It’s not
that there aren’t many quizzers of the stature of Mark Grant in the series,
although there aren’t, so much as there aren’t many quizzers of the stature of
Mark Grant full stop. It would be a brave person who’d bet against Mark completing
the Only Connect – Brain of Britain – Mastermind triple crown, like his
Crossworders team mate Ian Bayley. He looked even more of a favourite when he
put on a flawless 13 points on his specialist subject of The Festival of
Britain.
This left Brian Davis. I recently saw Brian
doing extremely well on Pointless. Brian took part in that remarkable heat 3,
in which he was one of three contenders who posted scores of at least 29. That
heat was won by Helen O’Connell, but Brian was runner up having scored a
remarkable 17 on GK. Last night Brian was answering on William Wilberforce, and
managed an excellent 12 to leave himself a point behind Mark.
Roy returned to the chair for the GK.
Incidentally, for the semi finals we seem to have dumped the pointless gimmick
of not telling the contenders how much each other has scored in the first
round. Well and good. Roy had decided on the tactic of answering quickly and
passing quickly. It worked for the first 4 questions, but a pass spiral soon
developed and he only found another 4 right answers for the rest of the round.
Well, look, Roy, you’re a Mastermind semi finalist and I know quite a few
people who’d love to be able to add that to their own CV.
Nicholas Young struggled somewhat on his own
GK round, and added 8 to his total. It’s all in the eye of the beholder, but I
didn’t feel that any of the GK rounds were particularly strenuous in last night’s
show. I had full houses in Nicholas, Mark’s and Brian’s rounds, which is
undoubtedly easier to achieve on my sofa than in the black chair. Still, it did
suggest that high scores were there for the taking, and sadly Nicholas’ wasn’t
high enough.
Sue’s round, on the other hand, well Sue’s
round was a very fine round indeed. She missed out on the same question I
missed out on, but otherwise produced a perfect score of 14. The only other
thing that did strike me about the round, though, was the time she took over
several of the answers. This I felt opened the door for both Mark and Brian,
who were definitely going to answer more quickly, I felt.
Brian did exactly that, and it’s well that he
did, for he missed out on a couple which were gettable. Nonetheless his round
had momentum right from the get go, and a fine string of correct answers
brought him 13 points, which meant he was level with Sue on 25 and no passes. I
still felt that Mark was going to win, but it did raise the mouthwatering
prospect of a tie break.
Mark reeled off the first few answers. However
his job was made harder after he hesitated over a question about aspic before
giving it a guess, and then dropped another of the next couple of questions. After
those couple though he powered onwards, and reached 13 for 26 and the win.
Congratulations, sir, and best of luck in the final. As for Brian and Sue, well
my heart goes out to the pair of you considering you both put in performances
which were worthy of a place in the final. But that is the nature of a knockout
competition I’m afraid. I hope that you can take consolation from a pair of
very fine performances. Good show. I think we’ll be very lucky if all – or indeed
any – of the other semi finals are as good as this one.
The Details
Nicholas Young
|
The Life and Times of Samuel
Johnson
|
11
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
19
|
1
|
Sue Duffy
|
A Dance to the Music of
Time by Anthony Powell
|
11
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
25
|
0
|
Roy Smith
|
2 Tone Records
|
7
|
2
|
8
|
5
|
15
|
7
|
Mark Grant
|
1951 Festival of Britain
|
13
|
0
|
13
|
0
|
26
|
0
|
Brian Davis
|
The Life of William
Wilberforce
|
12
|
0
|
13
|
0
|
25
|
0
|
2 comments:
Surprised to see Roy Smith in the semi-finals, given that (assuming the figures on this site are correct) there were 3 runners-up who scored more than 26 in R1 (Jo Skinner, Tim Fowler, and Brian Davis), and 3 others who scored 26 points with fewer than 3 passes (Alan Keys, Amit De, and Keshava Guha). This suggests that either somebody withdrew, or that the number of passes is not the tie-breaker used to decide who gets through to the semis.
This will be the third time Mark Grant has appeared in the final, following 2005 (where he finished 2nd) and 2009-10 (where he finished 3rd).
In the spirit of being a huge fan of your blog, and the show, I offer the following:
For the longest time I've been irritated by the variability of the length of questions and also a little concerned that it could make a difference in a close match.
In this contest, both Brian and Mark each got a total of 3 questions wrong. Yet Mark finished with 26, and Brian 25. The difference was that Mark was asked 13 in the first round, but Brian only was asked 12, despite both answering all of their questions correctly.
Now, sometimes hesitation could make the difference, but not in this case. Brian answered both his specialist and GK questions very promptly, and so I thought the length of the questions might be the determining factor.
Rather than make any claim without data, I just spent an hour with the text taken from the subtitles and the answer, which surprised me, is this:
Mark's specialist questions were 276 words long in total, and Brian's were 275. At first glance I was impressed with how close those numbers were, then I realized that Mark got 13 questions and Brian got 12 (for completeness, the total including GK questions were 617 for Mark vs 622 for Brian).
I don't think there's any way Brian could ever have been asked, let alone answered 13 in his specialist. Therefore it does seem in this case that the longer questions of Brian's hurt him and maybe cost him at least a tie break.
Also, as you note, Sue did hesitate much more on her rounds, but it's still mighty impressive that she only got 2 questions wrong in total. That must be one of the best losing performances ever.
Post a Comment