Well, we’ve been made to wait a
fortnight for this, dearly beloved, but last night saw the second semi final.
Let’s have a look at the runners and riders and the form book:-
Amit
De
|
Albert Einstein
|
13
|
0
|
13
|
2
|
26
|
2
|
Andrew Brewer
|
The Emperor Vespasian
|
11
|
2
|
17
|
1
|
28
|
3
|
Linda King
|
The Derby 1955 - 1990
|
12
|
2
|
16
|
1
|
28
|
3
|
Dave Cowan
|
Glamorgan CCC
|
12
|
0
|
15
|
0
|
27
|
0
|
Oliver Forrest
|
The Films of Wes Anderson
|
14
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
26
|
0
|
The first thing to note is that there
were some pretty hefty GK scores there. On the other side of the coin, though,
the trio with the fine GK scores, Andrew, Linda and Dave, all had good but not
outstanding specialist scores, compared to those of Amit and Oliver. I do tend
to feel that a semi is more likely to be won on GK than on specialist, and so I
very much thought that the winner would be one of the middle three.
Amit De, then, kicked us off on
Edinburgh. Now, I myself have never visited Edinburgh – rest assured, it’s on
the list – but general knowledge brought me 5 of these. Amit did a lot better,
scoring 9. That’s a good score. However it just failed to bring him to the
double figure score which can be psychologically demoralising for the
opposition in a semi final. Andrew Brewer, answering on the Emperor Vespasian
in the first round, had the lowest specialist of all of our contenders in this
semi. He really needed to get his challenge off to a good start now. Well, I
have to say that although I thought his round’s questions were fair, they were
generally quite tough. I’ve read biographies of Grant, and works on the
American Civil War, and I didn’t pick up points in this round at all. Andrew’s
score of 8 meant that at this stage he was only 1 point behind the leader, Amit.
However you had to reckon that somebody would get into double figures.
It wouldn’t be Linda King, though. I
don’t know if something had upset Linda’s composure, but she seemed a little
unsettled even before the round began, hesitating before answering with the
name of her subject. This uncertainty continued when she hesitated for a little
while before giving the correct answer of the Shadows’ Apache for the first,
which surely cost her the chance for an extra question at the end of the round.
Linda was a little unconvincing, and a score of 7 meant that she was already
two points off the lead, with 2 contenders still to go.
The next was Dave/David Cowan. I say
Dave/David because he was David last time out, and called himself David this
time out, while the TV captions said Dave. Now, as a Dave/David myself I don’t
mind which you call me. My birth certificate and my mother always call me
David. Pretty much everyone and everything else, me included, call me Dave, but
I won’t take offence at either. David’s subject was the Life of Aneurin Bevan.
Good choice, a fascinating subject, and one to which David did justice, posting
an impressive 10 and no passes.
All of which left Oliver Forrest to
complete the round. I suspect that Oliver might have been a little nervous
himself, as he missed an absolute sitter on “Of Mice and Men”, answering Carlson
for what was obviously Slim. Mind you, it’s easy for me to sit here and say
that having taught the book for what I would estimate to be a good quarter of a
century or more. He recovered well and powered on to 8 points.
So, as the half time oranges were
passed around, nobody was completely out of the competition, although a three
point gap, which separated Linda and David, is a hard one to bridge in a semi
final. Linda gave it a goo old lash, mind you. She showed that her 16 from the
heats was no fluke, and I would say that the 12 she produced last night was as
good in real terms. Although she wasn’t rushing at the questions she missed
very little, and kept her head throughout the round. 12 points for a total of
19 at least gave the others something to think abut, and gave herself a chance.
Next up was Andrew. His 17 on GK in
the heats was one of the best rounds of the whole series so far. Sadly, he
couldn’t manage anything comparable last night. It’s not that often that I
think that one GK round in a show is notably harder or easier than the others,
but I personally struggled more with Andrew’s questions than I did with anybody
else’s last night. By the end of the round he’d added 8 to take his total to
16. A rueful smile, but the look on his face when he returned to his chair
showed disappointment, and my heart went out to him.
Oliver, then, took his own shot at
the GK. To be fair, I’d say that off the shorter round the 8 that he too scored
was probably about equivalent to the 12 he scored in his heat. Pretty decent
performance, but he never really looked like getting much closer to Linda’s
total.
It’s really important to get a run of
questions you can answer for your first few GK questions. Amit, sadly, was
several questions into his round before he could add to his total, and from
then on he was always playing catch up, and always behind the clock. Ladies and
gentlemen, last night’s number was 8, and Amit was the 3rd contender
in a row to score this number in his GK round. This Kept him ahead of Andrew
and Oliver, but Linda was still out in the lead with one contender remaining.
I don’t know if David was feeling
very calm inside as he progressed through his round, but he certainly appeared
to be so on the surface. He wasn’t exactly snapping out the answers, no, but
calmly giving them and adding to his score, so much so that he achieved the total
with a little to spare, and finished with a good 11, and a winning score of 21.
Well done sir.
I wouldn’t blame Sue Duffy and Brian
Davis if they watched this semi with a certain amount of chagrin, having both
scored 25 in their own semi, and yet missed out on a place in the final, but
that’s the nature of knockout competition.
The Details
Amit De
|
Edinburgh
|
9
|
0
|
8
|
0
|
17
|
0
|
Andrew Brewer
|
The Life and Career
of Ulysses S. Grant
|
8
|
1
|
8
|
2
|
16
|
3
|
Linda King
|
Pop music of the
1960s
|
7
|
1
|
12
|
0
|
19
|
1
|
Dave Cowan
|
The Life of Aneurin
Bevan
|
10
|
0
|
11
|
2
|
21
|
2
|
Oliver Forrest
|
The Fiction of John
Steinbeck
|
8
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
16
|
1
|
1 comment:
I sympathise with Linda, "hesitating before answering with the name of her subject". When I sat in the black chair and was asked my specialist subject, I did not have a clue. It took what seemed like an eternity before I could remember it. After that I relaxed and gave it my best.
Post a Comment