Edinburgh v.
UCL
Another second round match, dearly beloved.
Last time out we saw Matt Booth, Marco Malusa, and
Robbie Campbell Hewson and their captain Max Fitz-James of Edinburgh
administer the UC equivalent of 6 of the best to an outgunned Sidney Sussex
team in round one. In this show they faced sterner opposition in the shape of George
Mitkov, Sophia Walker, Feiyu Fang and captain Robert Johnstone of UCL,
who had won an absorbing contest against King’s, London in round one.
I knew that Jerome K. Jerome said he could
watch work for hours, but both teams needed the full set of clues before Robert
Johnstone supplied the correct answer. Terms and phrases provided a gettable
set, and UCL should have done better than just the one. Mind you, Feiyu Fang
made up for this with a splendidly fast buzz to identify the Stamp Act for the
next starter. This brought bonuses on fruits in poetry which proved far more
fruitful for them, yielding the first full house of the evening. Sophia Walker
continued UCL’s impressive start on the buzzer by recognising a series of works
linked by the word castle for the next starter. Bonuses on the ancient
cartographer and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy provided nowt for any of us.
Neither of the teams knew or could guess the Roman goddess Concordia, the
goddess of defunct supersonic airliners. Max Fitz-James put his team into
negative equity with an incorrect early buzz for the next starter. I don’t
blame him. Had he been correct and thus opened his team’s account it would have
been inspired. This allowed George Mitkov to take UCL’s 4th
unanswered starter. With a couple of bonuses that took their total to 70. This
meant that we’d seen a genuine UC rarity, a shut out for the first ten minutes,
since Edinburgh, languishing on -5 had not yet given a correct answer.
This situation was soon remedied. Marco Malusa
did brilliantly to see a word cloud of the most regularly recurring words in a
famous work of philosophy, and ascribe it to Descartes. More of the same
provided a well-earned full house. Robert Johnstone knew that RCT stands for
Randomised Controlled Trial. A UC special set on names from Shakespeare made up
from chemical symbols – eg Aluminium and Arsenic give you the first word of
Hamlet’s speech about Yorick - brought UCL 2 bonuses, and me a lap of honour
for knowing all of those elements and getting a full house. The knowledgeable UCL
skipper knew that a lammergeier is a vulture for the next starter. Winners of
the Turing award in computing promised me little so I was quite surprised to
take two, the same two as UCL. Marco Malusa knew that Nicholas II was deposed
in 1917 to take Edinburgh’s second starter. Towns in southern England did not
fall kindly for them and they failed to add to their score. This brought us to
the music round. We were played the outro of a pop song, and Max Fitz-James struck
with a lightning buzz to identify Otis Redding’s Sittin’ on the Dock of the
Bay. More pop provided Edinburgh with a timely full house. George Mitkov came
in too early with an incorrect answer for the next starter, but Edinburgh didn’t
recognise abbreviations of teams from the premier league in Denmark. Not
flippin’ surprised, either. Another rush of blood to the head saw George Mitkov
lose another five points. Now, if a question has the words ‘essayist’ and ‘Shakespeare’
in it, hit the buzzer and say Charles Lamb. Max Fitz-James took the whole question
and then supplied the correct answer. A splendid full house on theology
followed. Feiyu Fang took a speculative punt that the name codeine is derived
from the Greek for poppy head, and he was right to do so. John Masefield’s poem
“Cargoes” provided just the one bonus. So on the cusp of the 20 minute mark UCL
led by 115 – 80, but things looked a little more hopeful for Edinburgh since
they had reduced the deficit from 75 to 35.
I did actually know that Saudi Arabia is the
world’s largest country without permanent rivers. Neither of the teams managed
that one. Feyu Fang dropped five for an early buzz. Max Fitz-James knew several
things which end in -oon, and what’s more he knew it very quickly too. Two word
phrases from Nobel Prize citations earned me a surprise two bonuses, but more
importantly provided Edinburgh with a full house which put them just one bonus
behind UCL. UCL skipper Robert Johnstone though was keeping his head, and was
the first to recognise a description of a clarinet. Figures whose surnames mean
blacksmith in their native languages made a rather lovely set which gave UCL
their on timely full house. Thus we arrived at the second picture set. We saw
Impression Soleil Levant and quite rightly, bearing in mind how famous the
picture is, Max Fitz-James ws in very quickly to identify it as the work of Claude
“Show me the” Monet. Works by other exhibitors in what has been called the
first Impressionist exhibition in 1874 brought another full house. Something about bases in Maths passed
by all of us without troubling the scorer. Sophia Walker won the buzzer race to
recognise several definitions of the word motif. UCL answered two bonuses on
Joshua Trees. I did think they might have sneaked in a question about the U2
album into that set, but it was not to be. Edinburgh weren’t finished yet.
Marco Malusa was very quickly in to recognise regions of Norway. Seemingly
inevitably they provided a full house, and yay, the scores were tied! Squeaky
bum time. Something about proteins gave Max Fitz-James the next starter, and
Edinburgh the lead for the very first time in the contest. Orchestral works
seemed to be something of an Achilles heel, since they only took one bonus. One
again it was that man Johnstone steadying the ship and keeping his team moving,
when he correctly supplied the term peptic for the next starter. Bonuses on
Japan yielded them nothing. Little time remained. If Edinburgh could take the
next starter, a bonus would surely leave
UCL with too much to do. Sophia Walker gambled on an early buzz – I really can’t
blame her for that – and lost five. Max Fitz-James – as influential for his own
team as Robert Johnstone had been for his – correctly identified the Algonquin
Hotel to leave UCL more than a full house behind. The Pritzker Architecture
Prize was the subject of the bonuses, but hey, we were gonged before any of
them were completed. Edinburgh had thus pulled off one of the greatest comebacks
since Lazarus, carried out with what I suspect should be a superb bonus
conversion rate.
Congratulations to both teams on a splendid
match.
Jeremy
Paxman Watch
I think that he was as absorbed in the match
as I was, since there was nothing worthy of note for the whole match.
Interesting Fact
That I Didn’t Already Know Of The Week
In Greek mythology Tiresias, the blind prophet,
had lived both as a man and as a woman.
3 comments:
Indeed it was largely on the bonuses that Edinburgh won the game, 19/24 to U.C.L.'s (also perfectly respectable) 16/30, plus just one penalty to their four. An excellent contest, most unfortunate that this is a sudden death tie, U.C.L. most unfortunate to go out this early. I'd be saying the same of Edinburgh had they lost though, especially after they recovered so well from such a bad start. Well played both teams!
On Monday, according to some contestants on Twitter, we should be seeing Clare vs St Edmund Hall, another fixture which could, in theory, go either way.
This match took place a year to the week after these two institutions met in the 2nd round last series. On both occasions, the team with a mathematician in seat 4 (UCL last year, Edinburgh this year) were leading by 5 points going into the final starter - however, this time the trailing team's gamble on that final starter was incorrect, leaving UCL to go out at this stage for the second year running.
Well this was an astonishing match! UCL very much snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. I felt they were stronger on the buzzer, if they had spent less time conferring they might have been able to leverage that strength a lot more.
I slightly favoured Edinburgh for this match, largely as they now have an established track record of sending through strong teams. An assault on the final seems inevitable, maybe this season will be their year?? Duly noted they couldn't find a lady contestant..
If we do get Clare vs Teddy, I may favour Teddy from a mathematical point of view.
Post a Comment