Good morning! How was Christmas for
you? Mine? – lovely thanks. Enough of such chaff, and let’s cast an eye over
yesterday evening’s 11th heat of Mastermind 2019.
Last week we had an all-female heat.
This week an even mix, and what I believe were 4 Mastermind virgins. They all
came up clean on the database, anyway. First up was Janet Farley. Now, allow me
a digression here, if you will. Janet was answering on REM. Way back in the mists
of time, when I made my first, ill-fated appearance on Mastermind in Geoff’s
2006 series, one of the contenders in my heat was Neil Phillips, and he too was
answering on REM. Neither of us won, but it was the start of something more
important, a friendship, and a few years later we would be playing together with
our esteemed captain, Mastermind champion Gary Grant, in the final of Only Connect.
Neil passed away earlier this year. To me he was always ‘the Legend’ following
his exploits in our OC semi final. Coming back to MM, Neil did brilliantly on
his round on REM, scoring 17. Well, personally, I don’t think 17 is possible
the way that the specialist rounds are constructed in this day and age – 15 is
even pushing it. So Janet’s 11 was still a competitive score, which would mean
that she wouldn’t be out of the running by the time that the half time oranges
were being passed around.
John Payne offered us another subject
that has featured on Mastermind before – Edward Lear – in fact I think that you
could say the same for all 4 of last night’s subjects. Edward Lear is of course
most famous for nonsense verses like “The Owl and the Pussycat”. He was a great
populariser of the limerick, to which I’m quite partial myself, and so it was a
great disappointment when I actually read some of his to find out that a lot of
them are, to use a literary term which I think may have been originally coined
by F.R. Leavis, ‘utter crap’. However I digress. It looked as if John was
making slow progress at the start, but he certainly picked up momentum as the
round progressed to take the lead with 12 and no passes.
Now, I’ll be honest with you, a lot
of art from the 1880s right through the first half of the 20th
century tends to leave me cold. I do have a thing about Gustav Klimt’s paintings,
though. So I was pleased that Rebecca Shaw had taken him as her specialist
subject. None of which meant that I scored many points on this round, but never
mind. Like John before her, Rebecca finished with 12 and no passes, and let’s
reiterate the point, for the last few years 12 has proven to be a very good
first round score on specialist.
All of which left us with just Simon
Jenkins. He was answering on The FA Cup 1978 – 2018. I can’t help confessing
that I’m always interested when I see the contenders taking a subject like this
with a date range. I mentioned earlier my ill-fated 2006 appearance. My specialist
subject back then was The Modern Summer Olympic Games. Now, I wouldn’t have
minded taking let’s say 1896 – 1936 – or – 1968 – present day. I was told in no
uncertain terms that I would have to do the whole lot. Yet since then the
Olympics has recurred, when I’ve seen other contenders allowed to take a
specific year range. Ok, maybe different production teams, different
approaches, I don’t know. Anyway, whatever the case, Simon had clearly learned
his stuff, and despite getting caught out once or twice he still managed double
figures with 10. Kudos to all 4 contenders for preparing well, I always
appreciate that.
With only 2 points separating all 4
contenders any one of them could win with a good general knowledge round. Sadly
for Simon Jenkins, though, he had an absolute ‘mare. For all the hype about the
effect of the ‘fearsome black chair’, it really isn’t very often that we see a
contender really have a disaster in the GK round. Unfortunately that’s exactly
what happened to Simon Jenkins. He fell into a deadly pass spiral, one of those
awful situations when not only does your memory refuse to supply the correct answer,
it also spitefully refuses to throw up any plausible alternative. It happens –
not that often, but it does, and there’s nothing you can do about it. Bad luck,
sir.
From a round where almost nothing
went right, to a round where almost everything did. Janet Farley really
impressed with her GK round. It wasn’t so much the score – although 16 was
certainly impressive – so much as the range of answers she provided. Even when
it looked and sounded as if she was guessing, the guesses were sensible, and in
the majority of cases right. Sometimes you just get a feel that a contender has
got something of a quiz background, and I had this feeling with Janet, even
though she did look a little shellshocked at her own performance when John
announced the score.
John Payne had the unenviable task of
following that performance, knowing that he needed to equal Janet’s performance
to go into the outright lead, or answer 15 questions correctly without incurring
any passes. Well, he had a good old go, you have to give him that, and you can’t
knock any contender who can get into double figures in a GK round. But even
saying this it was fairly clear that he was behind on the clock while there was
still a good minute to go, and he ended on 23, a perfectly respectable evening’s
work, but some way short of the target.
It fell to Rebecca Shaw, then, to
close the show. Now, Rebecca’s round was a pretty good demonstration, if any
were needed, of just how good Janet’s round was. I don’t mean that in any
derogratory way about Rebecca. Rebeca was clearly very focussed on her round.
She gave her answers very quickly and clearly, and made sure that she answered
every question so as not to incur any passes. She achieved 12 correct answers,
a good score. Yet for all that, a round in which it looked like she had got
close to an optimal performance for her, there was still daylight separating Rebecca
from Janet. That’s the way that it goes.
Good show. Well done Janet, and best
of luck in the semis.
The Details
Janet Farley
|
REM
|
11
|
1
|
16
|
0
|
27
|
1
|
John Payne
|
The Life and Works of Edward Lear
|
12
|
0
|
11
|
3
|
23
|
3
|
Rebecca Shaw
|
Gustav Klimt
|
12
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
24
|
0
|
Simon Jenkins
|
The FA Cup 1978 - 2018
|
10
|
2
|
3
|
7
|
13
|
9
|
No comments:
Post a Comment