Funny old game, Mastermind, isn’t it? You wait weeks and weeks for an outstanding round and then two come along one after another. We haven’t seen a perfect round since Ivan Milatovic’s specialist right back at the start of February, and as for an outstanding GK performance – well, you have to go back to 2024. Enough preamble.
The first of last night’s contenders, Gary Crawford, was answering
on my fill yer boots subject of the night, King Henry II. My boots were
certainly not full by the end of the round, but I was pretty happy to have
taken five of them. Gary himself took 6. Not a bad score, no, but he had started
so well and then somehow the brakes came on. He took a long pause before
getting one wrong and it robbed him of all momentum. The scores have been lower
this series, but we have no see anyone win from his position.
Kate Bleazard gave us a good old traditional subject in the
Miss Marple Novels of Agatha Christie. It’s a bit of a government health warning
subject though, since even if you just stick to the novels there are 12 of
them, and the setters expect you to know them in often minute detail. For the
most part Kate was equal to the challenge. She scored 9 and looked to be worth
every point of it. Me? Well, please bear in mind that I’ve never read any of the
works of Agatha Christie, whom I believe is a relatively popular author, so
zero was probably a fair result for me.
Nathan Hamer was offering an interesting subject in Wales
Rugby Union test matches 2000 – present. In case you don’t follow the fifteen
man oval ball game, Wales are currently having their worst run of results since
young Webb-Ellis first picked up the ball and ran with it. At least the round
served as a reminder that this is only a recent development and will surely be
only temporary. I won’t support Wales against England or Scotland (for family
reasons) but against everyone else – play ball. In the professional era teams
play an awful lot of tests every year so I thought that Nathan did well to cover
so much ground and get 7. I only had 2.
Finally Gary Austin. Gary was answering on the sitcom
Friday Night Dinner. I don’t know why but I never developed the habit of watching
it regularly so I failed to trouble the scorer. Now, like me, Gary is a retired
teacher, so he was guaranteed support from the Clark sofa. The jury is out on
whether this is more of a help or a hindrance. We’ve spoken before about the difficulties
that rounds on long running TV shows bring, and indeed Gary seemed a little
uncertain about a couple of questions. For all that though he managed a
magnificent perfect round of 12.
Put yourself in Eddie Crawford’s position. Judging by his expression
as he returned to his seat after his specialist he knew he had underperformed,
a fact which Gary’s round had made all the more obvious. At 6 points off the
lead he was destined to be a bit part player in the finale. So he told Destiny where
to stick it and went and delivered one of the best GK rounds we’ve seen all
series. Fifteen – count ‘em – fifteen correct answers. Almost every time he
looked in doubt he dredged his memory to come up with the right answer. We have
seen shows where a contender lying in fourth at half time has gone on to win,
but not many, and not from so far back.
Nathan Hamer was going to have to go like the clappers to
give himself a chance. Fair play, there were several times during his round
when I thought to myself – he’s a quizzer. But the fact was that he was falling
a little behind the clock. In the end he scored 11 – that’s pretty good in a GK
round. But it wasn’t enough. He finished with a good 18.
Another contender finishing with a good GK score was Kate.
12 and no passes would bring her level with Eddie. She got into double figures
with 10, to give her 19. This would have been enough to win most of the shows
we’ve seen since Christmas, but this, sadly, wasn’t one of them. It’s gutting not
to win, but at least it’s something to be able to say that you managed a good
performance. Kate can certainly make that claim.
Gary faced an interesting challenge. Anything less than a
double figure round might not be enough. 9 and no passes would only bring a tie
break. And traversing the long corridor of doubt did seem to be playing on him
as he round progressed. As it was, though, he gritted his teeth, toughed it out,
and found the 10 points he needed to get over the line.
Now, that was a great show. Do I feel for Eddie? Of course.
To manage such a great GK round and still fall short is something I wouldn’t
wish on anyone. But then, and I know that this will sound harsh, Mastermind is
a show of two rounds. You have to prepare, prepare, prepare for all eventualities
in the specialist. The more you prepare, the luckier you will get. So
congratulations to Gary. In his insert he said that he felt that he needed the points
cushion on specialist because he felt others would be better on GK. Well,
whether that’s hindsight or not, it doesn’t matter. Well played sir. Best of
luck in the semis.
Eddie Crawford |
Henry II |
6 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
Kate Bleazard |
The Miss Marple Novels
of Agatha Christie |
9 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
Nathan Hamer |
Wales Rugby union test
matches 2000 - Present |
7 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
Gary Austin |
Friday Night Dinner |
12 |
0 |
10 |
3 |
22 |
3 |
2 comments:
Nathan Hamer used to be in my branch in LearnedLeague before all of the British people were broken off into their own branch. I think he's also done pretty well on Only Connect before.
Thanks dxdtdemon. It doesn't surprise me. There's just a certain way of answering some questions, where you can almost see the contender thinking - yep, this is an old quiz chestnut, and they answer it almost without thinking.
Post a Comment