Have you had enough of Quizzy Tuesdays yet? I’m finding it a bit difficult, what with part of it being up against Bake Off. Nonetheless I’d rather have this than a two or three week hiatus of the kind they’ve given us in Mastermind in years past.
So let’s talk about tonight’s show. First up was Hilary
Burton. Hilary was answering on the Lord Peter Wimsey novels of Dorothy L.
Sayers, a good old traditional Mastermind subject if ever I heard one. As we
were watching both Dan and I made the same observation at exactly the sme time,
namely that Hilary seemed incredibly nervous. It wasn’t just the pair of us who
thought so – Clive, good egg that he is, made a point of asking her if she was
alright as she sat back in her own chair. Mind you, I’m a bit surprised that this
was left in and not edited out. She needn’t have been nervous, as it worked
out. Hilary knew her stuff in detail, and scored 11 – and only one longish
pause prevented her from getting an even dozen I’d say.
As the show started I thought I recognised the gentleman in
the second seat, and I was right. This was none other than Michael McPartland.
Last time we saw Michael in the Mastermind chair was in the grand final of
2014. Mugs don’t get to Grand Finals. I confidently said to Dan that he needed
to watch this round – I didn’t want to put the mockers on Michael by telling
Dan that he was definitely going to win (but I thought that he was). Michael
didn’t disappoint. He was answering on Arnold Schwarzenegger and he produced a
performance on a very wide ranging set of questions that was right out of the
top drawer. Fourteen points, and heaven help those contenders yet to come.
Nonetheless, both of the remaining contenders were not so
daunted that they didn’t manage perfectly good rounds of their own. Sam Bowdery
was answering on the TV series “The Wire”. Sorry, but I’ve never watched it
myself, so I can’t possibly say whether the questions were as difficult as
Michael’s, for instance. Yeah, the questions largely concentrated on the plot
details, but that’s par for the course these days. At least we’re showing some
consistency between shows here. Sam was caught out once or twice in the earlier
part of the round, but rallied well to post his own double figure score of 10.
Paddy Storrie brought the specialist round to a successful conclusion
with his round on the Falklands Conflict. I found myself having conflicted loyalties,
what with Paddy being a Deputy Headteacher. In all honesty I cannot conceive
how he found the time to prepare for his appearance, but prepare he did, since
he too managed a double figure score. It must have been daunting to have
reached double figures and still find himself four points behind at half time,
but nonetheless all of our contenders in this show were really giving us a top
notch contest for a first round heat.
Which, it must be said, continued through the GK rounds.
Sam was first to return, and it must be said that he made an excellent start to
his round. For the first minute or so it looked distinctly possible that he
might post a mid-teen score, which would certainly make things interesting.
Well, sadly he stumbled and lost a little bit of momentum in mid round, but
nonetheless he scored 11 to take his score to 21. If by any chance you ever
read this, Sam, all I can say is that as disappointing as it must be to come
fourth, few people come fourth with a performance or a score as good as yours.
Bad luck.
Which pretty much already gives the game away that Paddy
beat Sam’s score. If you can manage 12 in GK, which is what Paddy scored, then
you’ll always be competitive. It seems strange for me to be writing about good
GK performances in the same breath as writing that the contenders who posted
them still ended up among the wines and spirits at the bottom of the bill, but
then this just was not any ordinary contest.
I will confess that I was worried about Hilary coming back
for her GK round. Or worried for her. I needn’t have been. She favoured Clive
with a shy smile as he began, and then proceeded to batter seven shades of
whatsaname out of her round. With a three point lead at half time Michael was
always going to be the favourite, but as Hilary kept on dispatching each delivery
over the boundary rope the contest became more and more interesting. In the end
Hilary finished with a most excellent 16. Putting this into perspective,
Michael needed 13 just to force a tie break. I knew he was more than capable of
this, but it meant that he’d have to pass through the corridor of doubt in
order to do it.
Of course, he managed it. In fact he put in exactly the
kind of round you’d expect from a quizzer of his experience and stature. His 17
and no passes was the best GK round we’ve seen this series, and although there
is a little wiggle room, it will take some beating. In the current era of
Mastermind, 31 is a hell of a score, and that’s the score that Michael managed.
Congratulations to you, sir. Let’s not go burdening anyone with the pressure of
being favourite at this early stage. But you have to say that this was the
performance of a class act who looks good to go far. Spare a thought also for
Hilary Burton. It’s no consolation I’m sure, but come the end of the heats you
will, I am sure, have scored more highly than a lot of the semi-finalists and
but for the luck of the draw, you’d have been one of them.
The Details
Hilary Burton |
The Lord Peter Wimsey
Novels of Dorothy L. Sayers |
11 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
Michael McPartland |
Arnold Schwarzenegger |
14 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
Sam Bowdery |
The Wire |
10 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
21 |
1 |
Paddy Storrie |
The Falklands
Conflict |
10 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
22 |
2 |
2 comments:
Having also reached the semis in 2009-10, Michael McPartland thus joins the '6 and over' club.
Spooky coincidence: the show immediately after Michael's first appearance featured two of the specialist subjects that we saw on Tuesday (Lord Peter Wimsey Novels and The Wire).
Hi Paul,
It's surprising how often it happens when you watch back to back shows. I have heard theories that this is because there is a collective subconscious which means question setters tend to be thinking about the same things at the same times. Doubt it, but that's one theory. It's interesting to speculate whether the same setters were working on both, which might explain it. More likely it's just a coincidence - they happen in all walks of life.
Post a Comment