Yes, a lot better, thanks for asking. Isolation ends in a day , all things being equal. So let’s get on with this review of a remarkable edition of Mastermind, shall we?
First up was Andrew Fanko. Yes, Andrew Fanko, who won Series
15 of Only Connect with the 007s. Frankie reached the final when she appeared
on Mastermind recently, so it’s fair to say that I expected fireworks from
Andrew as well. Well, dearly beloved, I certainly got them. Andrew was
answering on Great Britain at the Winter Olympics, and this was always most
likely to be my banker subject for the night. Our Winter Olympians’ exploits
always tend to be overshadowed by those of their summer counterparts, but the
fact is we have had some notable successes over the years. Me, I was delighted
to get half a dozen of these right, but this paled into insignificance when
compared with Andrew’s magnificent 13. Specialist scores in the teens in the
current series with the length of the questions being the way that it is, are
like jockey’s legs – few and far between. Well, that was it – game over after
the first specialist round. Wasn’t it?
Well it looked that way after Emma Harris’ round on the radio
and TV comedy series “Good ness Gracious Me”. I really enjoyed the show, but
this didn’t translate into points for me, and, sadly, it didn’t really
translate into points for Emma either. We can speculate what went wrong with
her round – maybe nerves, maybe inadequate or inappropriate preparation, maybe
just sheer bad luck, but whatever the case she scored 3.
Next then was Patrick Buckingham. That, like Andrew Fanko,
seemed to me to be a quiz name to conjure with. A very quick google revealed
that Patrick, like Andrew, is a regular Quiz League of London player, and has
also played in Only Connect. It made me feel even more sympathy for Emma Harris.
Not only does it work out that you have a bit of a ‘mare on your specialist, it
also turns out that in your heat you have two of the most experienced and knowledgeable
quizzers in the whole first round. Which Patrick went on to show by whacking in
his own 13 on Francis I of France. With his and Andrew’s respective pedigree,
it was shaping up to be a very interesting GK round.
However, there was still Dan Sheehy to go. Dan came up clear
on my very rudimentary search, but that often means absolutely nothing. Poor
Emma must have felt that Pelion was being piled on top of Ossa as Dan too
racked up a massive 13 on the High School Musical Trilogy. Since coming back to
the blog this Autumn I have mentioned the risk-reward ratio in Mastermind, and
sadly this show amply demonstrates this for me. I do hope that no ignorant sods
take it into their heads to make insulting assumptions about Emma based on this
performance. As far as I know we’ve never met, but I have no doubt that she’s a
perfectly intelligent person.
It can’t have been pleasant for her having to return to the
chair under these circumstances, and bearing that in mind she actually made a
pretty good start to the round. She picked off the first few questions and was
moving steadily forward. Sadly, as the round continued the wheels came off a
little bit. You couldn’t blame her if her confidence was a little shot after
the first round, and when you’re confidence is at a low ebb, and you come up
against a question you can’t guess, then your round can ground to a halt, and
you find yourself having to fight for answers. In the end Emma managed 7 to
take her total to 10.
After Andrew completed his specialist round, I wonder if he
had any idea he’d end up going second in the GK round. Well, he was still joint
leader, whichever way you looked at it, and I reckoned he was going to set a
total which would demand a hell of a round from the remaining two contenders.
He did too. Andrew’s round was a fine GK round – as we’ve said many and oft a
time in the last year, anything in the teens is a bloody good score. He seemed
a little rueful at missing the last question, which was one of those you could
take a stab at if you didn’t know the answer – in Roman numerals, a horizonal
line above a numeral indicates it should be multiplied by a factor of what? In
my 30+ years of quizzing I only recall being asked that once before, and it was
the other way around – what number does an M with a horizontal line above it
indicate? Andrew zigged with 10, and so stayed on 26.
At least he didn’t have long to wait before he would find out
if it was going to be enough. In fact, the way things worked out Patrick too
threw in an excellent GK round of his own. I couldn’t call whether he was going
to beat the target or not for almost the whole round, but he’d reached 26
before the line of death had completely worked its way around his score, and
Clive was asking the last question. Whereas Andrew was given an unusual
question which you could have a guess at, I’d say that Patrick was asked a
rather more common question, which you were unlikely to guess if you didn’t
know. Patrick knew it, and that gave him 14 for 27.
It wasn’t all over yet, of course, since we still had Dan to
go. And he gave it a lash, no doubt about that. Still, by the halfway mark I
had him a question or two off the pace. By the end of the round he’d scored 100
to finish with 23, which is a very good score in its own right.
I’ve little doubt that Andrew’s score will reignite the
debate over allocating places in the semi final to highest scoring runners up,
and it’s certainly right that this should be debated. I terms of mere
statistics, Andrew’s score would have won all of the heats prior to this one in
this series. It is harsh to be excluded from the semis in these circumstances. As
far as I know they may well be using the same criteria for deciding who plays who
in the first round as they did in my day, when it all boiled down to making
interesting combinations of specialist subjects in each heat. This can have the
effect of making for the odd ‘top-heavy’ heat like this one. It’s not much
consolation, Andrew, if you ever read this, but at least if you apply to
Mastermind again, the chances of this happening to you twice are minuscule.
Congratulations, though, to Patrick. Apart from being a
brilliant all-round performance, it was even more impressive when you consider
that the GK round came immediately after watching Andrew whack in his own
round. It was a fine display of cool-headed quizzing. I have no wish to jinx
your chances, but I’m moved to say that heat was as good as a semi-final, and
it’s quite possible that you might not even face opposition as tough as Andrew
in your upcoming semi. Whatever the case, I wish you well.
The Details
Andrew Fanko |
Great Britain at the Winter Olympics |
13 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
Emma Harris |
Goodness Gracious Me |
3 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
10 |
8 |
Patrick Buckingham |
Francis I of France |
13 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
Dan Sheehy |
The High School Musical Trilogy |
13 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
2 comments:
From watching this one, I calculated that the maximum score it's possible to get at SS in the current era is 14. Andrew's answers were very, very short and snappy, almost interrupting Clive (and Clive seems slightly more open to allowing people to cut in just as he's finishing the question as John was). However, there was just one where he was slightly more hesitant, so he could have just got one more question, I think.
If repechage places were still allowed, the current highest-scoring runners-up from the first twelve episodes would be Andrew Fanko, Andrew Whiteley, Sam Anderson, Joe Pugh, Brian Hyslop and Seán Lee (in that order).
Interesting. Thanks for taking the time and trouble to comment, George. I tend to agree about Clive Myrie - he seems just a little less rigid than John H which is no bad thing.
Post a Comment