Now, wasn’t that more like it, dearly beloved? Tonight’s was to my mind the best contest we’ve seen so far this series.
First up was Mollie Bingham. It was announced that Mollie’s
specialist subject was Margaret of Anjou, consort of King Henry VI. While I
wasn’t exactly saying yum-yum and expecting a windfall of points, I do
immodestly think of royal history as one of my stronger subjects, but all I
managed to pull from this round was 2. Mollie did a lot better, scoring 9 and
incurring 2 passes. That’s a pretty decent score for the current era, and Molie
looked justifiably pleased as she took her seat.
Alice Walker was offering the musicals of Rodgers and
Hammerstein. That’s the sort of subject that you’d think offers opportunities
to a regular quizzer of a certain age – such as myself – since a basic working
knowledge of their oeuvre has brought points in quizzes across the years. I
added a further three to my aggregate. Alice took pole position by scoring a
fine 11 points, and also by incurring no passes.
The History of Canterbury was one of those subjects that I
was wary of predicting how I might do. Funnily enough all of my points came
from the questions based further back in time, which brought me 4 on this
round. Andrew impressed with his knowledge, which may even have brought him
more points than his fine 11, if he had only answered just a wee bit more
quickly. He too incurred no passes, to sit comfortably alongside Alice on the
front row of the grid.
If Sean Lea was intimidated by the previous two rounds, he
didn’t show it as he began his round on the first 9 seasons of the Simpsons. I
will make no apologies for the fact that this was my best specialist round of
the evening, netting me 6 more points for an aggregate of 15. Sean took 9
points from the round with 2 passes, which actually only left him in joint 3rd.
with Mollie.
Kudos to all 4 contenders for their specialist rounds. This
is just my opinion and as always, feel free to disagree, but I do feel that if
you accept a place in the first round, then you are also accepting the
responsibility to learn your specialist subjects as thoroughly as you can in
the time available. All 4 contenders in this show had clearly done this.
Onto the GK, then. Despite a rather good specialist round,
Mollie was starting from the back row of the grid, and she never really picked
up enough momentum to pull off any passing manoeuvres on the rest of the field.
Or, if I leave the tortuous formula 1 metaphors behind, she never looked
convincing in her round, and rather laboured to add 7 to her total. Whatever
the case she never lost her composure and seemed to be enjoying the experience,
and that is often the main thing.
Sean, who, like
Mollie, began the round on 9 points, did something quite different. He did
something I always love to see, that is, to throw caution to the wind, try to
answer everything, and as a result, come up with a round that is every bit good
enough to mean that anyone coming after would have to cross through the
corridor of doubt in order to overhaul his score. Whichever way you look on it,
his 13 n GK was a good score, which, in a slightly weaker heat, might have brought
him a win.
It didn’t in this one, though. Alice Walker, seemingly
totally unphased by the round she had just witnessed, strode boldly trough the
corridor of doubt to overhaul Sean, and just kept going. This was the best GK
round I think that I’ve seen so far in this series, and I can’t help wondering
just what level of experience Alice has in quizzes, since this was the round of
a very good contender indeed.
If I felt sympathy towards Sean for the way that his fine
performance would not bring him an appearance in the semi finals, then I was
even more sympathetic towards Andrew Whiteley. I mentioned, when describing his SS round,
how I felt that he was just a little slower answering than Alice had been, and
the same thing might be said of his GK. However, he was accurate, and his score
kept climbing and climbing. The buzzer beat him, though, as he finished with a
fine 14 and no passes, to end with 25.
To put the quality of tonight’s show into perspective, the
third placed contender, Sean, would have won 2 out of the previous 3 heats with
23, and Andrew would have won all of them with 25. It’s harsh that neither will
be back in the semis, but that’s the way the series rolls at the moment. As for
Alice, well, let’s watch out for her in the semis. If this is the level of GK
that she can produce, she’s certainly in with a shout. Well played to all.
The Details
Mollie Bingham |
Margaret of Anjou |
9 |
2 |
7 |
4 |
16 |
6 |
Alice Walker |
Rodgers and Hammerstein Musicals |
11 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
Andrew Whiteley |
The History of Canterbury |
11 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
Sean Lea |
The Simpsons Seasons 1 - 9 |
9 |
2 |
13 |
1 |
22 |
3 |
7 comments:
In answer to your question, Alice has plenty of quizzing experience. She was a Brain of Britain semi-finalist a couple of series ago and has won the individual points trophy in the Macclesfield Quiz League (beating me in both, I might add!).
Hi - thanks for leaving a comment. I have to say that it doesn't surprise me - she answered as a very good quizzer would.
This was a great contest.
With regards to the current series structure, I do prefer the current semi final format where it's only 4 contenders rather than 5 as the 5 contender setup always felt too rushed with only 90 seconds (if I remember correctly) for specialist subject.
However tonight shows the unfairness of no longer having repechage slots. Andrew can feel hard done by as 25 would have won him almost every one of the heats last year - again my memory isn't brilliant but I only remember Frankie Fanko getting more.
Hi Martin, and thanks for taking the time to comment. Yes, it was a great show. It is harsh, not having repechage slots. However, this is how it was when I appeared on Mastermind in 2006. I was second then in my first round heat with 24, which made me one of the three highest scoring first round losers. Just out of interest, Chaser Jenny Ryan was one of the others! Had I gained a semi final repechage slot, then I doubt I'd ever have applied for the 2007 series - and thus have missed out on the greatest experience of my quiz career.
Off the point, one thing I didn't mention was that I think some of the success of his week's show was Clive Myrie's willingness to increase the speed of his question delivery when the contenders showed they could cope with it. This was refreshing to see.
"Andrew can feel hard done by as 25 would have won him almost every one of the heats last year - again my memory isn't brilliant but I only remember Frankie Fanko getting more."
Ahem - there were actually two other scores over 25 in the heats last series...;-)
Here's an interesting thing I noticed... Clive Myrie actually allowed an interruption! I think it was on one of Alice's questions... to be fair he was very near the end of the question, but she definitely started speaking before he'd finished and he accepted it.
Didn't notice that George, but it is interesting if he did. We've all come in too early for one of John H's interminable questions - and they were shorter in my day! - so Alice must have got her timing just spot on to get in with her answer.
Post a Comment