I’m sorry. No honestly, I really am. What on Earth do I think I’m doing, I ask myself, posting this, when I have no idea whether it will only prove to be another false dawn – a solitary 2021 post, which will not be followed by another one for more than 12 months? But the thing is, I can’t come up with a good enough reason for not posting now. Whether anyone will ever chance to read it, well that’s a different matter. If you do, well, please accept that I’m being sincere when I say that it means a great deal to me if you do.
So
what’s prompted this, then? Well, I’ve been thinking more about quizzes than I
have done in a good year or so, since Clive Myrie made his debut on Mastermind
this Monday just gone. Cards on the table, I think he did well. One thing I
really liked was the way that once a contender got into a rhythm giving correct
answers, so did Clive, and seemed to speed up a little. The late great Magnus
Magnusson himself did this, and even picked out a couple of examples of this
happening in his excellent book “I’ve Started So I’ll Finish”. It’s very early
days, but he certainly did well with his first show.
Earlier
today I posted on Facebook about John Humphrys. I said - I always
thought John Humphrys was a little bit of an enigma. In 2007 he did not enter
the Green room at any time I was in there. Even for the final which was held in
Glasgow Caledonian University he left immediately after filming finished - a
rather sheepish production assistant told me he'd going because he was on the
radio the next day from London. Fair enough, although I doubt it would have
hurt that much to just pop his head round to say cheerio. However, I have to
say that while our final was being filmed, he was brilliant. In the heat and
the semi, filmed in Manchester, Ted Robbins had done the warm up, and he was
great, and whenever there was a break in filming he and JH would have a good
bit of banter going between them. With the final being filmed in Glasgow, they
hadn't brought Ted, and they had some local lad on in his place. As we entered
the studio he was going down like a lead balloon. For the rest of the
proceedings, John ignored him, and in breaks in filming he would regale the
audience with funny stories from Celebrity Mastermind. He was excellent. I
would have no hesitation saying he is a fine broadcaster. As a person, no idea,
because appearing in 5 shows with him didn't really seem to constitute an
introduction. “
I
don’t want to come across as ungracious. I can’t imagine the pressure of having
to present 4 shows like this, back to back, in the same day. But Dermot
Murnaghan was doing the same thing when I appeared on Eggheads and Are You An
Egghead?, and he had time for every contestant.
Shall
we talk about the show itself, then? The honour of kicking off the new new
series fell to Tom Jewsbury, answering on the geography of Switzerland. Tom
dropped a rather innocuous first question, and that’s the sort of mishap which
can often be the prelude to a bit of a ‘mare. Tom managed to put it behind him
and took 6 on the bounce before getting another wrong, then remaining clear
until the rest of the round, finishing with 10. Which at the least suggested
that overly long questions are still going to be a feature of the show this
year. I managed two of these, Interlaken fitting the first question, and
guessing that you’ll be in with a shout if you’re asked about a Swiss mountain
and you offer the Matterhorn.
Next
up was Megan Sutcliffe, answering on the family of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia. ‘Hallo
Dave,’ thought I (for ‘tis my name), “Nice subject. Fill yer boots, son.” Well,
I didn’t exactly fill both boots, managing 6 on a subject I quite fancied. This
was bettered by Megan’s 7. I did feel that quite a few of these questions were
prolonged beyond their natural lifespan – after all it doesn’t matter really
how much you add to the question which starts “What was the name of Nicholas II’s
mother. . . “ since you’ll either know it or not after those words. Just my
opinion, and as always, please feel free to disagree.
Eleanor
Launchbury offered another subject with the promise of points in the shape of
Sir Roger Moore. Eleanor’s round gave us the first passes of the new series, -
neither of which I knew the answers to either. I managed another 6, now, to put
me on 14 so far. Helluva start to the new series.
Last
but not least, Ranvir Singh Kalare answered on Bruce Springsteen. Which made my
heart sink just a little, since this meant my chances of getting close to 20 on
the specialist scores was practically zero. I have nothing against the Boss,
but have never been a great fan one way or another. Ranvir did considerably
better. He took the first 6 on the bounce, and quickly, and was looking good
for a highly commendable double figure score. His speedy answering ensured he
was asked one more question than Tom, but another 3 wrong answers left him 1
behind on 9.
So
to the General Knowledge, and first back to the chair was Megan. There were a couple
of things I liked about Megan’s round. I do tend to think – despite the superb
Jonathan Gibson, our 2021 champion – that younger contenders such as Megan are
at something of a disadvantage, lacking the few years at the quizface which
means you don’t drop much of the low hanging fruit. Despite this though, Megan
kept her head, kept answering rather than passing, and a late flurry of four
correct answers from the last 4 questions put her up to 17. Double figures in
GK – well done.
In
a mirror image of Megan’s round, Eleanor began with 4 correct answers on the
bounce. Eleanor was taking her time, weighing each question for a moment or two
before answering. That needs nerve, and it also means you have to be accurate. A
couple of wrong answers followed, and then a pass. When you haven’t got the
momentum, a wrong answer can completely take the wind out of your sails, and
Eleanor found herself becalmed on 16, only managing one more before the end of
the round.
In
a way, Ranvir’s GK round was similar to his SS round. He started pretty well,
and even the ones he didn’t know the answers to, he made sensible suggestions.
Like Megan before him, he also kept his head enough to offer answers to every
question. Some of his answers were enough to lead me to think that Ranvir is to
some extent a quizzer – the speed with which he batted a US state capitals
question to the boundary being one example. However, the gradient seemed to get
just a little steeper as he pulled into the lead, and he finished with 11 for
the round, for a total of 20. All 3 of this heat’s contenders so far had
managed double figures on GK. If Tom could do that, without incurring passes,
then the worst result he could have would be a tie break.
Well, 3 correct answers from the first 4 questions suggested he might do it with a little bit to spare. The next half dozen or more questions gave the lie to this. Tom became stuck on 14 for too long. By the time he passed, so had his opportunity. In the end he rallied enough to push up to 18, securing second. Well done to everyone, and an enjoyable start to the series. Well done to you too, Mr. Myrie, or may I call you Clive? Keep up the good work.
The
Details
Tom Jewsbury |
The Geography of Switzerland |
10 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
Megan Sutcliffe |
The family of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia |
7 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
Eleanor Launchbury |
Sir Roger Moore |
7 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
17 |
4 |
Ranvir Singh Kalare |
Bruce Springsteen |
9 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
2 comments:
Dave,
Firstly, if this is a one-off it's so good even just once to hear your opinions on Mastermind.
If this is the start of coverage of this years series - well, then I for one am looking forward to it and I'm glad to say so.
Turning to this heat, I really like Clive Myrie. I think his pronunciation is more precise than John Humphrys and so far there has been no patronising the contestants; a real bugbear of mine in the past. As far as the question length I actually think things have improved - last year I think a perfect specialist round would only score 10 some of the time, whereas in this episode a maximum of 12 or even 13 was potentially in reach. My theory is that lower maximum scores make the scores closer and therefore 'better' TV but it's sad that no-one will ever again be allowed to come near to Kevin Ashman's score.
Anyway, good to have you back, hope you're doing well, and I'll be reading whatever you write!
Wow - thanks Martin! I know myself a little bit better now in as much as I know not to make promises about relaunching properly and keeping it going. That's my intention, but then it was my intention last year and the year before as well. Let's see how it goes.
Clive Myrie - yes, early days but I thought he did a great job. We'll see with regards the questions. I certainly didn't feel quite the frustration level with these that I did last year and for the last few years. Thanks so much for taking he time and trouble to comment.
Post a Comment