Good morning, dearly beloved. If,
like me, you live in the BBC Wales area you were treated to the delights of
premiership rugby instead of Mastermind, but that’s what the iplayer is for.
First up, then, in heat 5 was John
Larkin. John’s subject was the islands of Great Britain. That’s one of those
subjects where the scale of the subject is a lot broader than you might think,
being as there are over 6000 of them, and over 100 are inhabited. While John
was answering, I got the impression that he was very sound on the purely
Geographic questions, but this round was far more wide ranging than that, with
questions about local customs, and who was buried on which island etc. which threw
him off balance a bit. He battled to a 7, but it looked like he would be out of
contention by the time that the half time oranges were being passed around.
Going into the show, my current
record specialist aggregate for this series is 23. A score of 8 on the islands
promised good things, however my knowledge of Tamsen Hiles’ subject, The Pop
Larkin Chronicles, is limited to a couple of episodes of the TV series The
Darling Buds of May. That, and a couple of good guesses, brought me three
points, which was enough to keep the pot boiling. Tamsen all the while looked
as if she was going to take a full house. Well, she didn’t quite manage that,
but it was still a speedy and very impressive round which brought a total of
13.
One reason why I thought I had a good
chance to set a new target was that our third contender, Nathan McLelland, was
answering on “Doctor Who “ 2005 – present. No bones about it, I love Doctor
Who, have watched every episode of the post 2005 series more than once, and
have written books about it. So it really is something of a banker subject. Nathan
himself did very well. He only missed two questions, although he might be
kicking himself for not remembering that Roger Lloyd Pack played John Lumic. I
added 12 to mean that ‘d equalled the target with one specialist set to spare.
This set, on The League of Gentlemen,
fell to Paul Gurrell. Now, to be honest, I liked the radio series , but never
really warmed to the TV version, although I know people who absolutely loved it.
So I had to be fairly satisfied with the 4 points I earned to set the new
target of 27. Paul was very unlucky. John seemed to have just started voicing
what was presumably the next question as the buzzer went, and the ruling was
that he hadn’t actually started the question proper. It didn’t, in the end,
make a huge difference to the result, but Paul can count himself a bit unlucky
there. He scored a highly respectable 10.
So to the General Knowledge. Now,
usually, when the contender in 4th does his or her GK round, it is a
little bit of a side show to the main event. Not so with John Larkin. After
John’s irritating plenty of time to catch up call to arms, John provided one of
the two best GK rounds we’ve seen all series so far. This was, to my mind, a
quizzer’s round. 14 took him to 21, and at least did enough to put the others
into the corridor of doubt.
Paul Gurrell again put on a respectable
performance in his own round, and for much of the round looked as if he was
going to at least match John’s total of 21. However he ran out of a little bit
of momentum as the tape came into view, and fell one short, scoring 10 to take
his total to 20.
As for Nathan, he started very well,
and was ahead of schedule by the halfway mark of his round. However the wrong
answers began to outnumber the correct answers, and in the end he finished with
8 to take his total to 19.
So, as Tamsen returned to the chair,
the big question was, could John hang on and win the contest from 4th
at the halfway stage. We have seen it happen before, but it’s rare. Once again,
we had a contender, in Tamsen, who looked as if she was going to smash it for
the first few questions. After that, though, it was a little bit more a
struggle, and it needed a late spurt to put her over the top with one question
left. 9 points meant that she finished on 22.
Well done Tamsen. Hard lines John,
but with GK like that, if you choose the right specialists for a future
appearance, you, my friend, could be a contender. As for Tamsen, throughout
both of her rounds, I thought – judging by the look on her face she is clearly
having the time of her life – I bet she’s been a fan of the show for years, and
I’m glad to say her piece to camera at the end of the show pretty much
confirmed it. Best of luck in the semis.
The Details
John Larkin
|
Islands of Great Britain
|
7
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
21
|
0
|
Tamsen Hiles
|
The Pop Larkin Chronicles by H.E.
Bates
|
13
|
0
|
9
|
1
|
22
|
1
|
Nathan McLelland
|
‘Doctor Who’ 2005 - present
|
11
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
19
|
1
|
Paul Gurrell
|
The League of Gentlemen
|
10
|
2
|
10
|
3
|
20
|
5
|
2 comments:
Interestingly, this is the third week in a row that the lowest-scoring contestant in the SS round has gone on to achieve the highest GK score of the show.
So Larkin the specialist subject narrowly beat Larkin the contestant. Has that ever happened before?
Post a Comment