Well, I have to be honest, The latest heat of Mastermind did little to allay my suspicions about the specialist rounds in this year’s series. This is just my impression and I haven’t done any statistical analysis yet, but the scores do seem to be a couple of points down on what you would expect. No, we haven’t seen a contender absolutely devour a specialist subject in the last few weeks, but even so, you’d still expect contenders who show the kind of knowledge that the average contender has shown this series to get a couple more points. Just my opinion and feel free to disagree.
First into the chair was Richard Saunders. Richard was
answering on the Culture novels of Iain M. Banks. (M when it’s sci fi, no M.
when it isn’t. Helmet off Korky, helmet on Constable Turnbull. Ask your
grandparents.) I have never read any of Mr. Banks’ work in either guise, so got
what I deserved, 0. I don’t know if Richard Saunders deserved only 6, but that
is what he got. Well, in this series that is not necessarily an uncompetitive
score.
Primary school teacher Constance Cooper was taking on my ‘banker’
subject of the evening, Alan Partridge. She was also taking on the curse of
support from the Clark sofa, being a teacher. Partridge is a wider subject than
you might think, considering the number of different shows on different media
featuring the character. I took four. Constance did better with 7, although I
did wonder if her two passes might count against her in a tight game.
Third to go was Rakesh Sharma. Rakesh was answering on
Bollywood screen star Madhuri Dixit. My knowledge of Bollywood is woeful – I was
a schoolmate of Mohammed Rafi’s nephew many decades ago, but that’s as far as
it goes. I didn’t expect to get any points on Rakesh’s round, and indeed I didn’t.
Rakesh though produced the round of the night, achieving the coveted double
figures on a round that seemed to my untutored eye to cover a lot of ground.
Finally Fiona Denby. Right, I know as little about Fiona’s
subject, English Wine in the 21st century, as I do about Bollywood,
what with my little kid’s palate and being teetotal. So I was a little
surprised to get a guess right to take my aggregate to five for all four specialist
rounds. Fiona did better, stretching her total out to 7. So at the halfway mark
all four contenders were just about still in it, but you’d have to say that
Rakesh had a decent lead approaching the Canal turn.
Richard returned first for the GK round. Not a lot I can
say. He had one of those rounds where the answers don’t come to you and your
guesses don’t work out. He finished with 12. Hard lines.
Constance had looked to be enjoying the Mastermind experience
very much, judging by her expression and she continued to smile during her GK
round. The points steadily racked up and just for a moment I thought that she might
just get into double figures. She certainly came close but fell just one short,
getting nine to take her total to 16.
Fiona Denby certainly gave it a lash, but every time she
looked as if she might just be building up momentum a wrong answer would pull
her back a little. In the end she repeated her score of seven from the
specialist round and this gave her a score of fourteen.
So to Rakesh. 6 and 1 pass would be enough to bring him the
win. On paper that doesn’t sound like a great deal to ask. Mastermind isn’t
played on paper though. At first Rakesh looked like he would do it easily,
reaching the brink of the target in pretty quick time. For a while though it
looked as if the wheels had come off, as Rakesh’s aim wobbled and the wrong answers
began cropping up. Like Constance, though, Rakesh seemed to be really enjoying
his Mastermind experience. He kept his composure and a couple of correct
answers saw him crossing the line ahead of the clock. He scored 7 for 17.
I ca salute competitors for whom the experience is the
thing, while winning would just be a bonus, and Rakesh certainly gave this
impression in his piece to camera. Well done sir, and I hope you enjoy the semi
final just as much.
The Details
Richard Saunders |
The Culture Novels of
Iain M. Banks |
6 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
12 |
3 |
Constance Cooper |
Alan Partridge |
7 |
2 |
9 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
Rakesh Sharma |
Madhuri Dixit |
10 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
Fiona Denby |
English Wine In the
21st century |
7 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
2 comments:
Firstly, thanks for continuing to do such an awesome job giving us your insight on Mastermind and UC.
I fully agree with your comment about Partridge being a bigger subject than people might think. Since there was no limitation of years or shows, you'd have to also read the 3 books, listen to the 3 podcast series, watch Mid Morning Matters, the Sky documentaries, comic relief/chatshow apperances and the standup/stage show recordings...and nothing came up from any of those.
Instead, there was a question about a horse from The Day Today which is about as obscure as you can get - Partridge lists a whole bunch of horses (e.g. "Alf Ramsey's Porn Dungeon") in those segments so it's not even as if there is only one horse.
So in summary I agree that, based on the one subject I feel I have knowledge of, it was really unfair to the contender and I have to agree that's likely the same problem for every other contender.
Hi Martin, and thanks for taking he time and trouble to leave a comment. Yeah, I thought that about the Day Today question too. Thanks for your kind comments about the blog.
Post a Comment