I don’t know
if you caught the article by Sirin Kale – who appeared on Mastermind as Sirin
Kamalvand last week – about said Mastermind appearance. If you didn’t, can I
respectfully suggest that if you’re a regular reader of LAM, then you’ll
probably enjoy it a lot. As you’d expect from a professional journalist, this
is a very well written account, funny and self-effacing. Go on, if you haven’t
read it, click this link. We’ll wait for you until you get back.
I've Started So I'll Panic - Sirin Kale
I didn’t see
this article until this morning. I saw a link posted on the Mastermind Club’s
Facebook group, then saw the link posted by Martin on a comment left on this
week’s Mastermind review. Thanks to both for that.
I always
enjoy reading what contenders in the regular series have written about their
experiences. One of the things I found most interesting in Sirin’s account was
about the horse trading which went on over her specialist subject. I made a
point when I wrote the review of saying that I don’t recall a single character
of a single TV series being a specialist subject before. Sirin explained how
she was not allowed her first choice, The Kardashians (the family, sadly, and
not the alien antagonists in Deep Space Nine) nor her second, The Spice Girls,
nor her third, Jane Austen. After having her fourth choice subject, ER accepted,
Sirin came to realise that 331 hours of television would be too much to absorb
for the time available, and negotiated the production team down to just Doug
Ross. To be honest this makes all the horse trading over my own first round appearance
in 2006 where all of my subjects were rejected in the audition, seem less
unusual. While on the same subject, Sirin writes Sirin said, “It seems the producers can refuse
many of a contestant’s choices, leaving them to tackle subjects they don’t feel
comfortable with. The contestants then don’t have as much time to swot up as
they would like.”
Yes,
that’s certainly true. But how else could it be done? When I applied in the
mid-noughties, your subject choices had to be all nailed down before you
received the contract to sign. Without wishing to be horrible, if you get to do
subjects that you are 100% happy with and confident about, well, be grateful that
you’ve been lucky. For example, in 2006 I had to come up with the Modern
Olympic Games off the top of my head. Ideally, it would have just been track
and field athletics in the modern Olympic Games. The production team would have
preferred all sports in the modern Summer AND Winter Olympic Games. We compromised
on just the summer. A hell of a lot more work than I originally planned. Given
the choice between accepting that, or not appearing, I reasoned that it was
something I could live with. I accepted the subject and got working on it. Likewise,
for my grand final the following year, I wanted to just answer on the 1178-1831
old London Bridge. The team insisted on every bridge that has stood on the site
and been called London Bridge. I accepted ad did the work. Nobody forces you to
accept. If you honestly can’t ‘do’ the subject in the time available to you, it’s
better to refuse and try again another time.
Sirin writes, “I later wonder if the producers zeroed in on me
because I am a woman of colour, not because I was particularly good:
historically, Mastermind has been an overwhelmingly white, male show.”
It’s difficult for me to comment on this. I’ve never been party to a
conversation with a member of any Mastermind production team over the subject
of selection criteria. It’s not the same thing at all, I know, but I did wonder
whether the reason why I was accepted at the first time of asking for two
consecutive series was because I live in South Wales, while if I was still in
London it might have been a lot less likely.
Describing
how she felt walking back to the chair for the GK round, Sirin tells us, “All
my energy and focus has been on not tanking my specialist subject. Walking back
to the chair, I think: should I have prepared for this? Could I have prepared
for this?”
That really
is the question. If you asked me - did you revise General Knowledge at all for
Mastermind? – I would give you the honest answer that I did not revise or learn
anything in General Knowledge specifically for my appearance in 2006, or for my
first-round heat and my semi final in 2007. I did try to improve a few areas
for the final, not to make myself an expert in my weak areas, but enough to help
me avoid missing any bread and butter questions in these categories. However,
if you asked me – did you prepare for the General Knowledge rounds on
Mastermind? I’d reply – absolutely did. My preparation consisted of more than
30 years of being an avid watcher of TV quiz shows since I was quite a young
kid, 19 years of playing regularly in pub quizzes and quiz leagues, and 12
years of regularly setting quizzes in the Aberavon Rugby club.
Sirin
makes the point that she had only 6 weeks between earning a spot on the show,
and the recording. This is the shortest period that I ever had to prepare for
one of my own shows. The longest was, if I recall correctly, 12 weeks. With
such a relatively short preparation time, I think she was right to concentrate
on specialist. The likelihood of being able to ‘question spot’ GK questions in
such a short time is very small. At the start of the article, she says, “ I
love pub quizzes, sure, and I’m good at them. Pre-Covid, I was part of a crack
team called Quizlamic State, who regularly took home first prize in our local
one. As team coordinator, I developed a reputation for ruthlessness, brutally
ejecting friends and, on one occasion, my boyfriend, if I thought they were
underperforming. At university, I was picked for our college’s University
Challenge team, though we didn’t get on the show”
I think
that’s reasonable grounds for thinking that your GK would be good enough to
bring you respectability at least. Yes, if you watched the show you know what
happened next. I think that Sirin gives a pretty good clue as to why it might
have happened. “when I apply for Mastermind, I haven’t watched it for years. How hard can it be? I think, with the breezy optimism of a rookie
journalist thumbing a lift into a war zone.” If Sirin had watched the
show, she’d have had an idea of the level and style of the GK questions, and it
would have also served as some preparation for the ordeal of the chair in the
GK rounds, and maybe wouldn’t have had the ‘mare with the first question which
she admits set her on a downward spiral.
One
other thing I noticed about the article was the reference to one of the other
contenders who repeatedly ignored the director’s requests not to slouch in the
chair. (A similar thing happened to me in my first appearance). “One won’t stop
slouching in their chair. Producers stop filming and ask them to sit up
straight, but they refuse and slump back down again within minutes.” Sirin mentions no name, but I can’t help
wondering if this is the contender whom I noticed as one of the most expressive
contenders we’ve had for many a long year. Especially when Sirin notes that
after the show “I collect myself enough to congratulate the winner, and watch,
amused, as the slumper scowls all the way back to their dressing room. I’d have
killed for their score, but they’re clearly devastated.”
All in
all, this is one of the best first-hand accounts of an appearance on Mastermind
that I’ve read in a very long time. If by any chance you ever come to read this
Sirin, thank you. You might not have won Mastermind, but you’ve won a fan.
4 comments:
> Sirin writes, “I later wonder if the producers zeroed in on me because I am a woman of colour, not because I was particularly good: historically, Mastermind has been an overwhelmingly white, male show.”
Assuming the "male" part of this is true, it looks like the producers have made efforts to change it - looking back through your episode reviews, if I've counted correctly there have been slightly more women on this series so far than men, with most episodes being 2-2.
There's been at least twice that Rachel from Friends has been chosen as a specialist subject, but both the times I'm thinking of were on celebrity editions, which I guess you aren't counting.
I think if I'd chosen a category as broad as ER, I'd ask if I could do a specific group of seasons rather than hone in on one character. As I said in the post about the first one, I think I would find it harder to research character's journey than research a whole programme.
Hi Andrew,
Yes, I think that recent seasons have shown a conscious effort to get away from the majority white male middle-aged & middle class contender profile.
Hi George,
Personally I was never tempted to attempt a TV series as a specialist. Before I ever applied, I did consider trying 'The Novels of Emily Bronte' (she only wrote 'Wuthering Heights')
As much as I'm all in favour of more diversity onscreen, I think to properly address the problem with white middle-aged men dominating the world of quizzing, there needs to be a bit more done than just encourage more people who aren't of that demographic to go on quiz shows. Ideally something needs to be done to empower these people to get into quizzing long before they go on a quiz show, to push themselves and get better at it. Otherwise, it will still be the white middle-aged male contestants who tend to win, as they'll be the ones who've been quizzers for a long time and are most practiced at it. In ten series of Toksvig-era Fifteen to One, there was only one female Grand Champion and, to the best of my recollection, not a single non-white one, despite plenty of people like that appearing on the show. That's quite shocking, and in some respects actually makes the problem worse as it sends out the (false) impression that white men are just better at quizzes.
I doubt they'd let you use the novels of Emily Bronte! But maybe the books of all the Bronte sisters would be a good bet? There aren't that many between the three of them, so wouldn't be that hard a one to revise for.
Post a Comment