For the last two weeks, dearly beloved, the scores have been modest. So last night, as we’re winding towards the end of the first round, I couldn’t help hoping that we’d see something in the way of pyrotechnics this week. Did it happen? Well, let’s come to that afterwards.
Meanwhile, let’s begin with Judith Edwards’ round on the
Hornblower Novels. That’s a good old, traditional MM specialist subject, that
wouldn’t have looked out of place during the Magnus era, isn’t it. Personally,
I have never read any of the novels – not making any point about this, just saying
that I haven’t. General knowledge gave me two points here. Considering the
famine rations that my specialist round scores have been on for the last few
weeks, I was going to take all that I could get. Judith got into double
figures, which is the mark of a good round these days. 10 points means that you’re
never going to be too far behind at the half time whistle.
Ten points was also the total that Lizzie Mackarel scored on
her own round on Joni Mitchell. Two gimmes gave me my two points on this round,
and I was not too proud to say thank you very much for them either. Judith in
the previous round had prepared her subject well, despite missing a couple, and
it’s fair to say the same thing about Lizzie. 2 contenders down, and two still
in it.
If I had a banker subject last night, it was The Wives of
Henry VIII. This was offered to us by Mark Spencer Turner. Did it work out for
me? Well, I took 4 of these, and was very happy to do so. It wasn’t an easy set
at all, and Mark scored a rather modest 6. The look on his face suggested that some
of those that he missed were areas he hadn’t considered during his preparation
for the round. It’s a fact that if you leave gaps, the question setters will
often find them.
Last but not by any means least in the first round was Helen
garner. Helen was answering on the Films of Tom Cruise, and this round conformed
to what we’ve seen this series, that is, a set of questions almost all of which
concentrated on the details of the events in the films, rather than production
details. Helen did extremely well – not a perfect round as she did have one
pass, but any specialist subject round that scores in the teens now is out of
the top drawer.
Let’s call a spade a spade, Mark was 7 points off the lead
when he returned to the chair and there was no way he was going to be able to
win. Under those circumstances I thought that he struggled manfully with his
questions. I don’t think he found it easy, but he struggled grimly on to accrue
a respectable 8 points for a total of 1. Which did actually mean that he was in
the lead briefly.
It can be enlightening to watch the different tactics that
different contenders use in their respective rounds. In 2007, after accruing 2
passes in my first round specialist subject, I made up my mind never to pass
another question, and I didn’t for the rest of the series. However it can also
be a valid tactic to go for speed by passing anything where the answer doesn’t
come immediately. I’d say that Judith had decided on this tactic, since
although she got into double figures again with another ten, she also took 6
passes.
By contrast, I’d say that Lizzie Mackarel was trying as hard
as she could not to pass, although she did pass twice in the end. Lizzie was
another contender who couldn’t quite disguise her frustration when answers
turned out to be wrong, and while I’d never advocate a McEnroe-esque outburst,
I can get on board with contenders who show that I matters to them. Lizzie
scored 10 too, but her lower pass rate meant that she was now in the lead.
You sensed this would not be for long, though, and it really
wasn’t. I thoroughly enjoyed Helen Garner’s round, for the range of knowledge
that she showed, the speed at which she answered most of the questions, and the
way that she seemingly dredged a couple of answers up from her boots – like the
Cernow/Cornwall one, for example. She passed the target and kept going, ending
with 27, and the admiration of Clive Myrie. I understand Clive’s excitement at
the size of Helen’s winning margin, but I somehow dount if it made the other
contenders feel much better.
Well done Helen! This was the best performance on the show for
several weeks. At the end Helen said her aim is to go all the way. On this
showing, that certainly looks like a possibility. Best of luck in the semi-final.
The Details
Judith Edwards |
The Hornblower novels of C.S. Forester |
10 |
1 |
10 |
6 |
20 |
7 |
Lizzie Mackarel |
Joni Mitchell |
10 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
20 |
2 |
Mark Spencer Turner |
The Wives of Henry VIII |
6 |
2 |
8 |
4 |
14 |
6 |
Helen Garner |
The Films of Tom Cruise |
13 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
3 comments:
Helen undoubtedly put in an excellent performance but I was frankly puzzled that she got through no less than 15 questions on Tom Cruise (13 right, 1 pass and 1 wrong) in her 2 minute specialist subject round. Nobody else has managed this to date, the apparent ceiling having been 13, with one contestant (Anthony Fish) just managing to squeeze out a 14th question. So what is going on here? It may be that the question setters are modulating question length within heats but not between different heats. I have also heard it said that Clive Myrie might be speeding up his oral delivery, particularly where a contestant is answering questions quickly (Helen being notable in this respect). So which is it? I'd be interested in your thoughts but am certainly thinking that it would be unwise to compare different heats in too much detail because of the concern that you may not be comparing like with like. What is clear is that the specialist subject questions are a good deal shorter this year as compared to 2020/21, when 10/11 points was the ceiling score. Oh for the days when the questions were shorter and read more quickly!
Hi, and thanks for commenting. Yes, it's nice to see the questions starting to go in the right direction. Now we haven't got John Humphrys laying down the law on it, we may get back to the days when a mid teens score is a legitimate target.
I think Clive tends to speed up when a contender answers quickly, and I think that this is totally legitimate. It is difficult to compare between shows, as you say. When there's no repechage slots for highest scoring losers this is alright as long as it is consistent within the same show. I'd still like to see the repechage slots back though.
Are all the heats broadcast in the order that they were filmed? I don't think there's any guarantee that they are - Clive Myrie never mentions the names of people from other episodes still in the contest in the way that, say, Jeremy Paxman sometimes does on University Challenge - but they could be, and if they are that could explain it. He could just be getting slightly more confident about being able to ask questions quickly and clearly, a skill that takes time to pick up.
Post a Comment