Yes, apologies, I’m a day late again. What can I tell you? Well, I can tell you that it was Parents Evening again last night, and that I was cream crackered when I got in. Does that make it any better? Oh well, please yourselves.
There was a typically varied and dare I say it, eclectic mix
of subjects last night. Matthew Cochrane kicked us off with British and Irish
Women Astronomers. My tactic here was to answer Caroline Herschel to anything
pre 20th century, and not to answer anything post 20th
century. Don’t knock it, this tactic brought me a point. Ironically that
question was one of the ones missed by Matthew. He did just fine anyway,
although with 8 he was just a couple of points short of being really competitive
and even this early in the competition it looked as if he was going to have
quite a bit of work to do in the GK round.
I doubt that anyone has taken British and Irish Women
Astronomers as a specialist before, and I’d be exceptionally surprised if
anyone had taken Sally Moore’s subject, White House Pets before. But why not,
it’s an interesting subject, judging by the questions that were asked. I
managed a couple, but Sally posted a very fine 12 points. Not good news at all
for Matthew, I’m afraid, but 12 is usually enough to guarantee you’ll either be
in the lead, or right on the shoulder of the leader as the half time oranges
are being passed round.
Susan Llewellyn answered questions on what was the most
traditional Mastermind subject of the four in this contest. This was Nurse
Edith Cavell, with whom I do have a very tenuous family connection. Edith Cavell
had an Aunt who married a distant cousin of mine. Well, I did tell you it was
tenuous. I have no idea if Susan Llewellyn knew about Edith Cavell’s Auntie,
but she knew a lot about everything else to do with her and scored an
impressive 11 points.
My favourite subject of the contest, dubious family
connections notwithstanding, was Martin McCann’s La Vuelta a España. It’s a funny thing that I’m not really interested in the
classics – you can keep your Milan – San Remo, your Paris – Roubaix and your
Liege – Baston – Liege, but I do love the 3 grand tours, and I took 4 points on
this round. Not a patch on Martin’s score of 10, mind you. I liked the way
Martin self-deprecatingly spoke later about his Spanish pronunciation, but it
didn’t seem to get in the way, as he took a good 10 points.
Before we get into individual scores, I must just say how
much I enjoy it when all 4 contenders can put on a decent show in the GK round,
so I enjoyed last night’s show. Matthew Cochrane was first, and of all 4
contenders he was most in need of a barnstorming performance in the GK round.
Wel, maybe his 11 points wasn’t quite that, but it’s certainly a ‘hold your
head high’ score for GK, and this set the target total at 19.
Realistically, this looked likely to be beaten by at least
one of the 3 remaining contenders. First to have a tilt at it was Martin
McCann. It was a good tilt at it too. You often see people starting really well
on their GK rounds, and then running out of steam – and answers – about halfway
through the round. It seems counter intuitive to call something that lasts less
than 3 minutes a marathon, but when you’re in the chair it can feel like a very
long time, and it’s easy to lose concentration and focus. Martin did very well
to add 12 to his score, to set the bar at 22. Winning score? It could be.
It was too high for Susan Llewellyn to beat. She took the 9
points she needed to push past Matthew’s total of 19, but that was as far as
she went. The perfectly respectable 9 points for GK put her onto 20 overall,
and that is pretty good going, whether other contenders score more highly or
not.
Only Sally Moore could possibly push Martin off the top step
of the podium and out of the semi-final. And to be fair, she gave it a last.
After a minute she seemed to be up on the clock and having supplied some very
good answers, it looked as it she would do it with a couple of points to spare.
However, it didn’t work out that way. As she closed in on the target, the
correct answers seemed to dry up. She equalled Martin’s total with just one
question left. She couldn’t dredge up the right answer, and that was that.
And it was that, too, since Martin had not accrued any passes
in either round, while Sally had picked up just the one in her GK. It can come
down to such small margins as this. Very hard lines Sally – a good all-round
performance that, on another day, would have seen you home. But congratulations
to Martin. A good all round display, where the self-discipline to answer
everything without passing brought a just reward. Best of luck in the semi-final.
The Details
Matthew Cochrane |
British and Irish Women Astronomers |
8 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
19 |
2 |
Sally Moore |
White House Pets |
12 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
22 |
1 |
Susan Llewellyn |
Edith Cavell |
11 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
Martin McCann |
La Vuelta a España |
10 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
3 comments:
Astronomers not Astrologers!!
What a mistaka to maka! Oops - apologies
Just happened to come across this blog entry today- thanks for the kind comments particularly in regards my doubts on my Spanish pronunciation!
Post a Comment