We’re getting there, Dearly Beloved. Another
semi has come and gone. Here’s the form guide to last night’s contest:-
Lucy Glass
|
Prince
|
11
|
1
|
13
|
4
|
24
|
5
|
Keshava Guha
|
The novels of Penelope Fitzgerald
|
15
|
1
|
11
|
1
|
26
|
2
|
Sanjoy Sen
|
The TV series Jeeves and Wooster
|
13
|
2
|
15
|
3
|
28
|
5
|
Hamish Cameron
|
John Knox
|
13
|
0
|
14
|
3
|
27
|
3
|
Carole Stead
|
The Reign of Akhenaten
|
14
|
0
|
16
|
1
|
30
|
1
|
I was a little surprised to see Keshava in the semis, since I didn’t think that he had made it into the top six runners up once passes had been taken into consideration. Maybe names above him on the list couldn’t take part? Who knows? The eye was very much drawn to Carole Stead’s total. Her 16 on GK in the heats was a really impressive performance, and if she could repeat that kind of form she’d be hard to beat. Sanjoy Sen’s 15 also suggested a strong contender. However, Hamish Cameron has played in more Mastermind semi finals than any other contender in the history of the show, and reached the final last time he got this far, so you’d have been foolish to discount his chances.
First up was Lucy Glass. Now, when you watch
the semis in Mastermind, you know that you’re going to see some contenders who
coped very well with GK inn their first round but fail to do so in their semi,
and you’re going to see some contenders who couldn’t get to grips with their
second specialist round anything like as well as their first. Well, I’m sorry to
say that this happened to Lucy. I do know a lot more about her specialist
subject, Queen Victoria, than I know about any of the other of tonight’s
specialists, and I have to say that the questions were very fair, and Lucy
missed out on somethings it’s reasonable to expect her to have known. As a
result, her 5 meant that she was out of contention before another contender had
even walked through the portal of portent.
That contender was the aforementioned Keshava
Guha. It’s been quite a quizzing year for Keshava as he’s now notched up second
round appearances in 2 of the big 5 – UC being the other. Answering on test
cricket between England and India he began extremely well, and seemed to really
know his stuff. However the brakes seemed to come on about halfway through the
round, and he finished on 6. You had to reckon at this point with 3 contenders
left to come that at least one of them would score quite a bit more highly than
this. Two contenders down and, sorry to say, two contenders out.
Now, with Sanjoy Sen taking his place in the
chair, we finally got a contender who could handle his specialist as well as he’d
handled his specialist in the first round. Sanjoy’s round on Sir Alec Issigonis
wasn’t perfect – he picked up a couple of passes – but it was still pretty
good, and more importantly it gave him a 4 point lead at this stage of the
competition, and also served as a statement of intent to the two contenders
left to come.
The first of these was Hamish. I met Hamish
personally when he was the stand in for my grand final in the 2007 SOBM. As I’ve
mentioned before, I stand ready to be corrected about this, but I believe that
Hamish is the most experienced Masterminder of them all, and has sat in the black
chair answering questions more times than anyone else. Bearing this in mind it
was a shock to see him commit the cardinal sin in one of his first questions on
Thomas Paine, of pausing for ages on a question before passing. Bearing in mind
he amount of time he threw away he did actually recover well to take his total
to 8, but make no mistake, his campaign had reached crisis point. Two points
was a gap that could be bridged on GK. But if our final contender, Carole,
could throw in a perfect specialist round, then the game could have been up.
Carole Stead was answering on the Plays of
Henrik Ibsen. Never read one, never seen one, know a few of the titles and that’s
about it for me. So I can in no way comment whether her 10 and no passes was
just a very good performance, or a great one. Still, in retrospect it threw a
little bit of a lifeline to Hamish. Having said that, though, if all three put
in a GK round similar to their relative performances in the heats, then Hamish
looked unlikely to make it to a second final.
Before we got to the business end of this
contest, though, Lucy and Keshava had to return to the chair. I was surprised
that Lucy scored 8, to bring her total to 13, not because she did as well as
she did, but because during the round it did feel a little better than the
score suggested. She showed a pretty wide range of knowledge. Keshava, alas,
found the questions not very much to his liking, and added 5 to his total for
11.
So to Hamish. Now, the highest GK score we’ve
had so far in the semis was Sue Duffy’s 14 in the first semi, closely followed
by Mark Grant’s and Brian Davis’ 13s in the same semi. Hamish himself put on a
storming performance to post his own 13. If his specialist displayed the
cardinal sin of hesitating before passing, then his GK was a fine
display of the cardinal virtues of this kind of quizzing; crisp, quick
answering, total concentration on the question in hand. A total of 21 had won
the previous 2 semis, and that was where Hamish stood now. He could do no more.
John rather unhelpfully made a point of
reminding Sanjoy that the target now stood at 21 before his round began. I
liked Sanjoy’s style, very quick, crisp answers, no messing around. After 4 or
5 questions he was on target and up with the clock. Then three or four
successive questions held him up in the middle of the round, and you felt that
was his chance gone. Building up a head of steam again he came desperately
close, but the blue line of death only allowed him to reach 20.
So finally Carole. Going back to my comments
about Lucy’s specialist round, sometimes contenders just can’t find the same
level of performance on GK that they managed in their heat, and sadly for
Carole this was the case here. Now, don’t misunderstand my comments here. A GK
score of 8 in a semi isn’t a bad score. But it’s not on the same level as a 16
in the heats, and after the first half a minute Carole was behind on the clock,
and it really didn’t look as if she was going to make it.
So well done Hamish, congratulations on making
another final. Brian Chesney’s and Isabelle Heward’s wins in the last 2 series
suggest it may well be a recidivist who wins again this year. However, Hamish
isn’t the only one who has made the final so far. There is a certain chap who
has placed 3rd and 2nd in Grand Finals before who awaits.
. .
The Details
Lucy Glass
|
Queen Victoria
|
5
|
2
|
8
|
1
|
13
|
3
|
Keshava Guha
|
Men’s Test Cricket between
England and India
|
6
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
11
|
2
|
Sanjoy Sen
|
Sir Alec Issigonis
|
10
|
2
|
10
|
2
|
20
|
2
|
Hamish Cameron
|
The Life and Times of
Thomas Paine
|
8
|
1
|
13
|
1
|
21
|
2
|
Carole Stead
|
The Plays of Henrik Ibsen
|
10
|
0
|
8
|
0
|
20
|
0
|