And so to business. First up we had
the universities of Warwick and Exeter. I’ve never been fortunate enough to
visit the University of Warwick but had a wonderful day a couple of months ago
where a party of my pupils were hosted by Exeter University for the day, and a
most beautiful place it is. Warwick were represented by Emily Wolfenden, Jacopo
Sartori, Robert Gowers and captain Ben Beardsley. Exeter’s team were Simon
Waitland, Will Klintworth, Jessica Brown and their skipper Danny Lay.
The first starter gave us several
clues to the word fever. The last being the 1977 film whose soundtrack features
‘Stayin’ Alive’, Jacopo Sartori got the right film, but the wrong word with
night. This allowed the Exeter skipper in. He earned bonuses on words marked ‘origin unascertained’ in the
OED. Exeter took the first two, but for the last they zigged with Tory when
they should have zagged with Whig. The next starter asked for the name of a
ship. As soon as it mentioned setting out in 1831 I took a flier with HMS
Beagle. Moments later Will Klintworth did the same just before JP was about to
give us the name of Robert Fitzroy. Right – here we go. The next question gave
us the first (very mildly) controversial moment of the series. Asked for the
French artist who depicted the oath of the tennis court amongst other things, Exeter
answered Jean-Jacques David. JP awarded them the point, although he took care
to correct them that the painter’s name was actually Jacques Louis David. “Yes,
David is correct – it was Jacques Louis in fact.” OK, now, to the best of my
knowledge there’s no internationally accepted hard and fast written set of
rules for quizzing. But what I’ve observed I many if not most of the quizzes
that I’ve played in is that UNLESS the forename is specifically asked for in
the question, then the surname alone is acceptable for an answer. However, EVEN
IF the question does not ask for the forename, if the player chooses to give
the forename and gives it incorrectly, then even if the surname is correct the
answer is adjudged wrong. – AS I say, there’s no hard and fast set of written
rules which applies to all quizzes, and not every quiz that I’ve played in follows
this convention. I mention it though because it sets a precedent, and if it’s
allowed in this question, then in the interests of fairness it should be
allowed throughout the series. – OK, 1 –
2 -3 we’re back in the room and out of pedantry corner. Exeter took the full
house on David. Did you know that mebi denotes 2 to the power of 20 – I think? Me
neither, and nor did either team, with Warwick losing five for an early buzz. For
the next starter I took a flier on tall tree like grasses of Asia being bamboo,
meaning that the only two consonants in the word were b and m. Other clues bore
this out. Emily Wolfenden was first in to wipe out the Warwick deficit. Physics
and astronomy gave me nowt but Warwick took 10 points. So to the picture
starter and , wonder of wonders, something I actually know a little about in
Science, the periodic table. We were shown a small section and asked to work
out the missing element. “Gallium!” I shouted, and set out on my lap of honour,
before hurriedly sitting down again as Danny Lay gave the correct answer of
Germanium. I was one out. Still, I took a full house of bonuses of more of the
same. You can bet your life I completed my lap of honour then. Ben Beardsley
atoned for losing five on the previous starter by coming in very early to
identify a Fresnel lens for the next starter. Economics and economists did
nothing for me, nor for Warwick for that matter. This left the score at 65 to
20 in Exeter’s favour at just after the ten minute mark.
I knew that it was Gore Vidal who
coined the term The United States of Amnesia. Neither team twitched until JP
mentioned Myra Breckinridge, which saw Will Klintworth buzz in for the points.
This gave Exeter bonuses on Chien-Shiung Wu (yes, quite right, also known as
CHien-Siung Who? in LAM Towers) . Doesn’t matter – I still got Uranium 235 and
238. I’m too old for two laps of honour, but for me it was worth one. Exeter
took two bonuses to my one. I knew that the Glomma is a river in Norway though,
which neither team did. Fair play to Ben Beardsley of Warwick, though. He had
answered Angels in America for the next question while I was just starting to
process the question. Albums of Bob Dylan should have given me more, but I only
managed the first and last. Warwick took one bonus. The Warwick skipper clearly
had the bit between his teeth when he took the starter knowing something about
calculus to which the answer was lambada – sorry - lamda. Fair enough. Biology
answers beginning with the letters co – gave Warwick a couple of correct
answers, and me an unexpected full house. Cotyledon? Really? Where the hell did
I dredge that answer from? No idea. So to the music starter. Now, played part
of a symphony I thought – sounds like 20th century, which for me
narrows it down to two composers – Stravinsky and Shostakovitch. I zigged with
Stravinsky, while Danny Lay knew it was Shostakovitch. More classical works
with a title or nickname taken from the name of a city. I recognised the first
two, but missed Haydn’s London symphony, as did Exeter. Now, for the next
starter, after the date of birth, and the fact he started as a Conservative MP,
then an Independent, then became a Labour MP I confidently asserted it was
Oswald Moseley. As JP was halfway through mentioning the British Union of
Fascists, Robert Gowers came in with the correct answer. Place names beginning
with Ak gave Warwick two correct answers and me one. Danny Lay pounced on the next starter knowing
the founders of the video game company Valve. Performers who are also
Companions of Honour saw the funniest moment of the show, as Exeter offered
Mick Jagger when the answer was Dame Vera Lynn. Which reminds me of a nice
story. When jazz legend George Melly once remarked on Jagger’s growing number
of crow’s feet, he replied that they were laughter lines. Quick as a flash
Melly retorted “Nothing’s that funny!” No? Well, please yourselves. They failed
to take either of the other bonuses on offer. Right then, ladies and gents. Believe
it or not I had a third lap of honour-worthy answer when I supplied the word
organelle just before Ben Beardsley did for the next starter. I only knew it
through past editions of UC. Aquatic ecology provided both of us with just the
one correct answer. Neither team knew that the 1946 Peace Constitution was that
of Japan – I thought that one was guessable if you didn’t know it. Still, on
the cusp of the 20 minute mark the scores stood at 115 to 85 to Exeter. They’d
looked well in control in the first 10 minutes, but now we certainly had a game
on our hands. Good show.
A rush of blood to the head saw Will
Klintworth lose five for suggesting the Brownlee Brothers won medals in the
decathlon. This allowed Ben Beardsley in for triathlon. Medical radio isotopes
promised me but little, still I managed the second. Warwick took the last. The
second picture round saw the impressive Warwick skipper provide the title of a
painting – The Last Judgement – all the time shaking his head as he did so.
More paintings on the same subject brought just 5 more points. Emily Wolfenden
buzzed early to identify Tchaikovsky’s words about Rome and Juliet. Bonuses on
British History and specifically Princes of Wales were all gettable, and they managed
two. That set had put Warwick into the lead for the first time in the match
with just 5 minutes remaining. I was impressed with the way Simon Waitland
identified the Oystercatcher from its description and the fact it is the
national bird of the Faroe Islands. The musician and performer Wendy Carlos (yes,
alright, Wendy Who? in LAM Towers), gave Exeter a timely full house. Both teams
were tied, and this was turning into an excellent match. Warwick looked in
trouble when Jacopo Sartori took a flyer that Warsaw was the city being described for the
next starter. It lost them five, and let in Will Klintworth with Krakow. (“KRAKOFF
is correct” sniffed Jex). Microbiology offered a chance to stretch the elastic
between themselves and Warwick, but they failed to add to their score. None of
us had a clue about a Leclanche cell for the next starter. The next one was a
buzzer race, though, with Emily Wolfenden the first to work out that the
capital of the US State named after Elizabeth I is Richmond. One bonus to tie
the scores – any more and Warwick would lead. The Islamic Calendar gave them 10
points, and a sender lead. With only a minute to go, it looked like it would
all come down to the next starter. Quite rightly Will Klintworth gambled on
speed – but his answer was wide of the mark. Robert Gowers gave the correct
name, the Italian mathematician Peano, and bonuses on Romantic poets and birds took
their score to 165. Even a full house for Exeter would only tie the teams again
now. On a flag starter I was pleased I could identify Rwanda, as did Danny Lay.
I reckon that could be an important answer. We were gonged before they could
answer a bonus, so it didn’t mean that Exeter won. However, 150 makes them more
likely to take a repechage slot than 140 would have. Warwick’s 165 though put
them through as of right.
Well played both teams. This is the
kind of match we want to see and was a great start to the new series.
Jeremy Paxman Watch
Hardly anything to report. He still
corrects punctuation does Jez, though. When Warwick offered AYKron he replied
somewhat pointedly, “ACKron, yes.”
On the second picture bonuses, where Warwick
came up with the sensible suggestion of Dore, he poopoohed this, “No it’s
William Blake - Very distinctive.” Yeah, well, it’s easy to say that when you’ve
got the answer written down in front of you, Jez. Try it from the other side of
the desk. Not so easy now, matey boy.
Interesting Fact That I Didn’t Already Know Of The Week
The OED lists the origin of the word
tantrum as possibly deriving from a Welshman’s mispronunciation of the word ‘anthem’.
(Personally, I think that’s probably a load of cachu. If you don’t speak Welsh,
guess or look it up.)
7 comments:
Excellent start to the new series, two well matched teams, both sides deserve to come back in some way or another, and I'm sure Exeter's score will be enough. Warwick deserve credit for fighting back well after that poor start, not to mention after being fined for a highly pedantic interruption. It is early days of course, but both these sides could get a good run with a reasonable draw.
On the bonuses, Warwick managed 15/33 (with four penalties) and Exeter 14/25 (with two penalties), so, as with many a game last series, it was a game narrowly won on the buzzer.
On Monday, Emmanuel College Cambridge play Glasgow; the week after, our first Oxbridge match of the season, with Pembroke for Oxford and Downing for Cambridge.
Glad to see you're both back in business on your respective blogs!
What a cracker to get us started, had serious doubts Warwick would pull that one back and was indeed a little surprised at the weak start. I seem to remember last years Warwick team being snappy buzzers, I suppose this shows how that can be dangerous. I've never visited either but both are suppliers of quality grad students to us. Both teams seemed quite STEM heavy which I hope doesnt hobble them in later matches. I'm sure Exeter was one of them institutions that disgracefully closed its chemistry school a few years back.
The questions were enjoyable for me. The isotopes one was tricky but gettable, but I have a slight advantage as a collaborator works at a nuclear research facility that has a sideline in producing said isotopes..
I think the derivation of tantrum a Welshmans pronounciation of anthem is a stretch, must look this up. The obvious Welsh derivative I have heard of is Penguin..
Hi Both,
Yeah, nice to be back, and it was a good match. Funnily enough Aethelstan I felt the sae about both teams being STEM heavy. It didn't matter so much in this match as it wasn't overly weighted towards Arts and Humanities, but it does make you worry that they might struggle to overcome a genuinely all-round team. First round form is unreliable, but I think we'll see some stronger performances before we get to the repechage.
Very enjoyable first episode and a great review as ever.
Much closer than I expected as Warwick have a good student quizzing record and take part in various University-level student quiz competitions. For instance, the results of the 2018 British Student Quiz Championships (which took place after the 2018-19 UC series was filmed, and won by Cambridge for the first time) are at http://www.hsquizbowl.org/db/tournaments/5089.
I certainly was surprised that Warwick had three mathematicians on their team, but Warwick does have a very strong reputation for maths. Also having three people studying the same subject can work: Peterhouse won a few years back with three historians I believe.
I thought Exeter were unlucky not to get the final bonus awarded - hope that those 5 points don’t make a difference as to whether they return as one of the highest scoring losers.
He's correcting pronunciation, surely not punctuation?
'Sorry, Exeter, you used a semi-colon wrongly in your answer, so I'll have to turn it over to Warwick'. Perhaps not...
Goldsmiths are back on University Challenge this year, and our first round match airs Monday, September 24. Hope you'll be cheering us on!
Hi Keshava,
Too right! Congratulations for making it back on!
Post a Comment