Here we are then, friends, into the quarter final
stage. First into the lists were Wolfson, Cambridge, and Balliol, Oxford.
Wolfson featured the talents of Justin Yang, Ben Chaudri, Paul Cosgrove and their skipper Eric Monkman,
while Balliol gave third appearances to Freddy
Potts, Jacob Lloyd, Ben Pope and captain Joey Goldman. The form book pointed to
Balliol being slightly more impressive in the first two rounds than Wolfson,
however neither of their opponents had been able to make much of an impression
on them. Whether this would continue to be the case against Wolfson, who
represented a rather more substantial challenge than either of their previous
opponents remained to be seen.
Jacob Lloyd came in far too early for the first
question, on what was only ever going to be a hit and hope punt from deep. The
quotation being given referred specifically to poetry, as Eric Monkman guessed.
Wolfson’s first bonuses were on given names, and they managed 2. I knew that
Shakespeare died in the 1610s, and Eric Monkman was a tad unlucky to lose five
for answering 1600s – I thought that the question had finished when he buzzed
as well. Joey Goldman was in for that immediately. Balliol’s bonuses on terms
containing the word – Factor – brought them 5 more points. I was really rather
surprised when Joey Goldman came in too early and gave a wrong answer to
question which, even to a layman such as myself, seemed to beg the answers
apogee and perigee. There was no way that Eric Monkman was going to turn his
nose up at that windfall. Artistic depictions of Hell provided a rather gentle
full house for both of us. I had no idea about the derivation of the word
quandary, but Justin Yang was in there very quickly. Parallels which end in a
zero were guessable but by no means easy, and Wolfson managed the first two.
The first picture starter showed an outline map with a Swiss city highlighted.
Freddy Potts correctly identified Basel – good shout, that. More maps showing
inland commercial ports brought 10 more points. It couldn’t disguise the fact,
though, as we approached the 10 minute mark, that Wolfson had made the better
start, leading by 60 to 25.
I think that you could actually see Joey Goldman
holding himself back for a moment before buzzing to link “The Mersault
Investigation” with Albert Camus’ “L’Étranger”. The film director Jane Campion brought
another 10 points, and Balliol certainly weren’t wasting any time agonising
over their answers. Now, I know bugger all about archea and eukaryote, although
I’m reliably informed that they are not Greece’s premier cabaret act, but they
were enough to bring Ben Chaudri the next starter. Old Kingdoms stubbornly
refused to yield any points. There was mild amusement in LAM Towers when Freddy
Potts gave JP the correct answer ‘tit’ to a UC special for the next starter. 2
bonuses on French painters followed. In short order Balliol had reduced the
deficit to 5 points. Which soon doubled as Joey Goldman, knowing he was
hearing the summary of an American novel, came in with “The Age of Innocence”,
when the rest of the question made it clear we were being asked for “The
Ambassadors”. Eric Monkman inevitably took that one. Medicine poleaxed all of
us, as no further points were scored. This brought us the music starter. Eric
Monkman and I both went for Schubert, correctly. Three more pieces inspired by
Goethe followed. Neither of us had either of the first two, but Wolfson really
should have known that Dukas composed the Sorceror’s Apprentice – from Fantasia
if for no other reason. Oh, those costly Balliol interruptions. Jacob Lloyd was
the trigger happy buzzer on the next starter, and again, if he’d waited a
little longer, it would have been obvious that we were being treated to a
quotation by the Duke of Wellington. Erik Monkman, secure in his role of the
snapper up of unconsidered trifles took that one as well. Sorrow in Shakespeare
yielded only 1 bonus. With kinder sets of bonuses, Wolfson could by now have
be approaching the event horizon. Eric Monkman himself was the next to
suffer a rush of blood to the head. He came in far too early, giving us the
name Schumpeter, which was the name of the economist who wrote them. However
that wasn’t what the question wanted. It wanted the word capitalism, which Joey
Goldman duly supplied. MacArthurs provided Balliol with a timely full house.
Freddy Potts looked as if he’d never heard of the heraldic Yale, but still got
it from the Ivy League University and the locksmith. Civil wars brought a second
consecutive full house, and amazingly Balliol had edged into the lead. On the
cusp of the 20 minute mark they had 105 to Wolfson’s 100.
How was either side going to win this, then? Well,
Wolfson needed to improve their conversion rate, while Balliol had to stop
shooting themselves in the foot, while at the same time winning the buzzer race
on their fair share of starters. Freddy Potts was very unlucky on the next
starter. His answer of myths for a specific type of narrative was not close
enough to be correct, but probably close enough to help Wolfson, in the shape
of Justin Yang, to get the correct answer of fairy tales. Football in the 19th
century did not promise to help them improve their conversion rate, and to be
fair, it didn’t. So to the picture starter. Joey Goldman recognised the work of
Caspar David Friedrich, and more pictures provided another full house. They
know their painters these boys. Boccioni? Impressed. Some Science thing I didn’t
understand followed. Nobody had it. Joey Goldman just couldn’t resist throwing
a little more buzzer at the next question, and losing five points as he offered
Theatre of the Absurd, while Theatre of Cruelty was required. Wolfson couldn’t
get that one. Now, if you know what Sternuatation is, then you’ll know the one
of the 7 dwarves called Sternuens in latin is Sneezy. I just love UC – where else
would you get a question about that asked? Eric Monkman won the buzzer race for
that one. Chemistry bonuses still only yielded the one. Nobody identified the Gospel
of Matthew as the source of a quotation. Eric Monkman was having pretty much
his own way with the buzzer race by this time, and was quickly in to identify
Pauli as the man behind the Exclusion Principle. After their struggles with
bonuses to this point, when JP announced that the next set was on World
Heritage sites in China I wouldn’t have blamed them for asking him “You’re
havin’ a laugh, aintcher?” He wasn’t. Actually, though they managed two from
this set. Poor old Baliol, I’m sure that the succession of penalties had sapped
their ability or their will to compete on the buzzer at this stage. It was all
too easy for Eric Monkman to process 1798 – writer – sister Cassandra – and come up
with the answer Jane Austen before they could buzz. Insect life cycles brought
two more bonuses, and a lead of 45. Surely that was the game? Not necessarily.
Joey Goldman came in like a lion to take a correct interruption with Jomo
Kenyatta. If they could get a full set on place names . . . well, no. There
just wasn’t time. The gong went after they had taken their score to 135, 30
points adrift of Wolfson. Hard lines Balliol – but at least they still have
another chance. Well played Wolfson.
Jeremy
Paxman Watch
Freddy Potts looked JP straight in the eye. “Tit.” he
said. There was a wry look on JP’s face as he sized up his antagonist, and for
the briefest of micropauses I did hope he was going to respond with a bad
Robert de Niro impression, “You talkin’ to me?” . Sadly not.
We might not get any of the sparkling acid drops of
previous years now, but at least we still get the odd wry observation from Jez.
Asked for one team which won the football league in the 1890s, Wolfson supplied
two. “You were asked for one,” JP replied, lowering his eyes and pausing for
comic effect before adding “Well, you didn’t get either.”
Interesting
Fact That I Didn’t Already Know Of The Week
The word quandary is derived from the latin for
when, and a French phrase meaning – shall I say it?.
3 comments:
Agreed about that 1610s interruption; the rule appears to be 'any incorrect buzz while Paxo is still talking, even if he is literally just finishing the question'. I knew they have to draw the line somewhere, but TBH I'd say the rule should be 'any incorrect buzz that results in part of the question not being read out'.
Anyway, this was a very good close match between two fine teams both of whom would be worthy semi-finalists, and I certainly still wouldn't bet against Balliol making it through.
It was a match won by Wolfson on the buzzer: Mr Monkman took eight correct starters, same as Balliol managed altogether, which made up for just 13/33 bonuses, which they'll probably have to improve for next time. Balliol did considerably better on the bonuses, 17/23, but SIX penalties is never a good thing. But, as I say, certainly not out of it yet.
On Monday, then, we should be seeing Bristol vs Corpus Christi. And advanced warning: at the earlier time of 7:30.
Arguably Balliol lost it on the buzzer just as much as Wolfson won it on the buzzer. Yes, it's always possible the two sides will meet again, in which case it would be very interesting to see what Baliol's buzzer tactics would be this time.
Another quip from Jeremy to add to "Paxmanwatch": To Balliol: "You lose five points... So you're no longer in the lead!"
Post a Comment