Sunday, 24 December 2023

LAMMY Awards 2023: Committee's Special Award

Yes, a special award goes to Clive Myrie, who had the mortifying experience of having 2 celebrities in the same show fail to score any points in their specialist rounds on Celebrity Mastermind last Friday. What made it worse was that I don’t believe that anyone has ever failed to score in their specialist round before. No, I’m no going to name the celebrities. I don’t think that they should be held up to ridicule just for trying to earn a few quid for a worthy cause.

There’s an interesting debate over on the Contestant Hub on Facebook about Celebrity versions of quiz shows. It’s a tricky one. While sleb versions of The Weakest Link, Pointless, Bridge of Lies etc. are perfectly watchable, Sleb Mastermind can be an uneasy watch at times. To compare it with UC at Christmas, he teams are made up of journalists, writers and academics for the most part and I’m still ofen surprised by what they don’t know. Which I really shouldn’t be, because they’re not quizzers. But at least in that show the contestants are part of a team, and it’s easier to laugh off a bad performance as part of a team.

Yes, I know that anyone going on Celebrity Mastermind really should know what they could be letting themselves in for. But when it becomes an uncomfortable experience for the viewer as well as the poor sleb in the chair, then you have to question when this stops being entertainment.

So well, done to Clive Myrie who did his level best to maintain the positive atmosphere and the bonhomie in this particular edition. It can’t have been easy.

LAMMY Awards 2023 : Award for Achievement in Question Mastery

Right, I have searched my soul about the 2023 Award for the Best Achievement in Question Mastery. I know that I am leaving myself open to accusations of nepotism and favouritism in my nominations. I have played in two quizzes regularly in 2023, and two other quizzes. Starting with the others, the second was a quiz in Mumbles. Each round was interspersed with ‘you all have to join in’ Play Your Cards Right. Not a great evening. The first was in Aberdare, and it wasn’t bad. Not as good as the best quizzes in the rugby club. I’ve posted about the monthly film quiz in the Gwyn Hall, and the question masters do put a lot of time ad effort into it. But when you get right down to it, I don’t enjoy them as much as I do the quizzes in the rugby club. And I’m very sorry, but the best quizzes I the club this year have been done by

Dan Ayres

Jessica Ayres

Adam Cook –

who, incidentally, are all members of my team. Dan is my son in law, married to Jessica (my youngest daughter) and Adam is their good friend, who I am proud to say is also now my good friend. Dan won the LAMMY last year for his single handed revival of the music round. Jess has produced some fine quizzes – some which have been at quite short notice. But I think that the single quiz I have enjoyed most this year was Adam’s last one for the club. So the LAMMY award for the achievement in question mastery goes to

Adam Cook

Many congratulations, this is well deserved.

So farewell, then. . .

So farewell, then, A Question of Sport. Perhaps we should clarify that. The BBC have said that they’re not cancelling the show, they’re just not going to make it any more. Almost worthy of Sir Humprey Appleby that one, chaps. (eg the irregular verb - I give confidential briefings, you leak, he is being prosecuted under the official secrets act.)

I have some observations to make. Believe it or not I have been watching it for most of its fifty three year run. In the early 70s it was one of those shows which I sort of watched by osmosis – my father, who had not the least interest in sport – had a default mode of BBC1 – so if there wasn’t anything he wanted to see on ITV the telly would be on BBC1 (he was very much not a BBC2 sort of guy.) By the mid-late 70s I would really enjoy it, having developed an interest in sport through my schoolmates. I fact, it’s only in the last couple of years that I’ve really got out of the habit of watching it.

Look, a fifty plus year run is incredible for any TV show. But things do have their natural shelf life. And once a TV show has reached its old age, the rules change. Once a show gets to about 10 years old, then it can often do with freshening up a bit. But once it gets past 20, it works differently. The show will have a regular and loyal audience, to whom it has become a comfortable little luxury. To change the show, make it less comfortable and more, for want of a better word – ‘edgy’ is a dangerous thing to do. In 2021 AQOS did that big time. The show had been fronted by popular host Sue Barker for over 20 years. The two team captains, Tuffers and Matt Dawson had been with her for over fifteen years. All the familiar faces were swept out in one go. It was a brave, and dare I say it, foolhardy move.

You see, taking its lead from shows on other channels, the sport content, which to my mind had been reduced from the noughties onwards was reduced even further to be replaced with more family panel game entertainment. Which is not why we bought the ticket in the first place.

Who’s to say it won’t ever be brought back, though? But if it is, then the producers could do a lot worse than watching an old edition from the 80s and 90s to see how it’s really done.

2023 LAMMY Awards: Award for the best performance in a broadcast quiz

Yes, dearly beloved, it’s time to present the award for best performance in a broadcast quiz. What a crop of worthy nominees we have, too. They are:-

Jonathan Taylor, Jonathan Williams, Joshua Mutio – The Strigiformes

Harry Scully, Chloe Margaux, Alex Radcliffe, Bea Bennett – Durham University

Stuart Field

Daniel Adler

To be honest any of our nominees would be worthy recipients of a LAMMY. The Strigiformes won Only Connect, a massive achievement which requires great all round knowledge. The University Challenge Grand Final back in May was a replay of the first heat of the first round, as Durham saw off a superb Bristol team to become the champions. As I say, all of these are worthy champions.

In April Stuart Field beat the Clark prediction that he would be second in the Mastermind Grand Final, where a brilliant specialist round and a fine GK round gave him the won. Now, for fairly obvious reasons I love Mastermind, and in a normal year Stuart would be adding a LAMMY to his trophy cabinet. But it’s not a normal year. For this is the year that this year’s LAMMY winner –

Daniel Adler

Added the Brain of Britain title to his Counterpoint title won a few years ago. Serial finalist Daniel is also a LAM reader and contributor. Who could ask for more?

Tuesday, 19 December 2023

2023 LAMMY Awards: Best New Quiz Show of 2023

Yes, gentle reader, it’s that time of the year again, when we at LAM Towers (me) hand out the gongs popularly known as the LAMMYs. As is traditional we begin with the ever popular award for the best new quiz show of  the year. Here are the shows that I reviewed this year :-

New shows 2023

Puzzling

007: Road to a Million

Alan Carr’s Picture Slam

The Finish Line

Cheat

In With A Shout

Working from the bottom upwards – April saw the debut of In With A Shout. Now we all know that one of the great pleasures of watching a quiz show is shouting out the answers. So why not get the contestants to the show to do just that? Sorry, but it left me cold.

In the same month Netflix gave us Cheat. I like Ellie Taylor and don’t dislike the scion of royalty, Danny Dyer. But the whole cheating and calling out the cheats dynamic just didn’t work for me and I thought Ellie was under used.

In September the humble picture quiz round proved the inspiration or Alan Carr’s Picture Slam. I’m not a fan of picture rounds, and Alan C’s particular form of hysteria did nothing for me either.

Other streaming services than Netlix are available and one of them, Amazon Prime gave us 007: Road to a Million. This was an unusual hybrid between a challenge based show like, say, Survivor, and a straight quiz. It was not without interest, but I found each edition too long for the amount of content it actually provided.

So all of this leaves us with a shortlist of two, and the awards committee (me) had a real dilemma. One of the two shortlisted shows was a pure quiz, with a gimmick, which was a little easier than I would have liked but was relatively undemanding and enjoyable viewing in the afternoon slot. The other was absorbing, very challenging, had great play at home potential, but was not a pure quiz. The former, the Finish Line is a perfectly good afternoon quiz – better than the Tournament, but not as good as last year’s LAMMY winner Bridge of Lies. My opinion, feel free to disagree. But the 2023 Best New Show goes to (drum roll)

Puzzling

It’s difficult to describe the show without mentioning some similarities to Only Connect. Well, if you’re going to take inspiration from an existing show, it makes sense to take it from a good ‘un. Cogratulatios to Lucy Worsley and all involved.

University Challenge at Christmas

No, don’t panic, I’m not reviewing every edition of University Challenge at Christmas. No, but I did think that I might just mention last night’s show, being Amol’s first.

It isn’t easy finding exactly the right words to discuss an edition of the Christmas shows. After all, it’s Christmas. Nowadays the people invited to be members of teams of their own alma mater tend to be largely academics, writers and broadcast journalists. These are people perfectly secure in their own intelligence, who have nothing to prove to anyone. They were invited on the show, and probably get nothing from it other than the fun of it, so I feel a bit of a heel if I criticise.

The thing is though, on some shows you forget that possibly none of these people have a quiz background. Then when you forget that fact, you can be struck with how much they don’t know. This always threatens to lead me down a slippery slope to criticism. So I’ll simply say that I enjoyed last night’s show, albeit that the questions were to me noticeably easier than the regular show. Amol took to this like a duck to water as I think you’d expect, although I did think that he showed off just a little bit – for example when nobody knew a quote from Macbeth he started reciting more of it. Not going to win friends and influence people that way, Amol.

Mastermind 2024 first round heat 17

Well, there it is. The last first round heat before Christmas. I didn’t hold out much hope for a reasonable score on specialist aggregate, as you’ll know if you read my preview.

First off we had my supposed ‘banker’ subject, Meat Loaf, offered to us by Thomas Roebuck. I will be honest, I was surprised to get 3 of these. Oh. Don’t get me wrong, I was delighted as well. I doubt that Thomas would have been delighted if he’d only got three. So it was probably just as well that he got a highly respectable 8. It’s a funny score in this era of the show, is 8. 15 years ago that would have put you out of it at half time in most contests, but now it’s certainly competitive and gives you a springboard for the GK round.

Our second contender last night was recidivist Helen Lippell, who played in the first rounds of both 2016 and 2020. She is also an alumnus of Only Connect. So I had no doubt that the black chair would not affect her nerves at all. This was well founded. Answering on Grinling Gibbons Helen produced a first class specialist round, amassing 12 points. I was delighted to get 4 on this round myself – I wouldn’t claim to know a lot about Gibbons, but I do know quite a bit about that period in London.

Sian Bladon was answering on cricket, specifically England Women’s Cricket in the 21st century. Now, we saw last week that if you take a subject like this with quite a small subject area, the setters are going to expect you to know it inside out, and they’re going to throw more than a few bouncers and doosras at you. I actually got two of these through pure blind luck in guessing countries correctly. I was glad for Sian that she got the last question on the buzzer correct to take her score up to 5.

Finally Jon Phillipson Brown took to the black chair to answer his round on Gerard Manley Hopkins. Well, gentle reader, if you read my preview I speculated how much I would remember after 40 years. The answer was not a lot. I took two. By contrast Jon did exceptionally well. He didn’t quite get to Helen’s 12, but did himself proud by getting 11. Now, the mathematically gifted among us will have worked out that contrary to my Jeremiah-like prediction, I did get my aggregate into double figures, with 11 points.

Not time for us to dwell on that though since the GK round was starting. You know me, I am always impressed when a contender whose SS round has not maybe gone as well as they would have hoped comes back to the chair and gives it a really good lash in the GK. Welcome back Sian Bladon. In cricketing parlance this was a really good example of building an innings. Sian seemed to have decided on the tactic of pass if you don’t have a Scooby, and this meant that she kept her round moving onwards until the beeps. She scored a good 10 to take her total to 15.

Next up was Thomas Roebuck. You know how sometimes I say that a contender’s GK answers lead me to suspect that they are a quizzer? Well, that was the distinct impression that I formed as Thomas built his round of 13 points. This score took him to a total of 21 points. I’ve often banged on in the past about how you need to put your opposition into the corridor of doubt by making the highest score that you possibly can. Well, this was a fine demonstration of just that.

John Phillipson Brown had a go. He needed 11 to go into the outright lead, and 10 with no passes to force a potential tie break. As I say, he gave it a go, but when he made his first pass it meant 10 would not be good enough. He got as far as 9 but time ran out, leaving him a metre or two short of the tape.

Which meant that Helen Lippell would do it if she scored 10 and any number of passes. If she fell short then she had to score 9 points with no passes to force a tie break. Well, she did fall short of 10. She did score 9. And . . . she did not pass. Tie break! Thomas went first, and knowing the answers to the questions, I knew that he’d only scored one. As Helen returned I knew after the first three questions that she had won. Hard lines for Thomas, but very well done to you both, and Helen, best of luck in the semis.

The Details

Thomas Roebuck

Meat Loaf

8

0

13

0

21

0

22

Helen Lippell

Grinling Gibbons

12

0

9

0

21

0

25

Sian Bladon

England Women’s Cricket since 2000

5

1

10

4

15

5

 

Jon Phillipson Brown

The Life and Poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins

11

0

9

2

20

2