Sunday, 3 November 2019

University Challenge 2020 - First Round


Last of the first round matches, then, dearly beloved. Hoping to take the last place in the second round by right were Matthew Le Croisette, Mary Lobo, Row Janjuah and their captain Isaac Brown, representing Lady Margaret College, Oxford. Hoping to prevent them from doing so, and take the coveted spot for themselves were Downing College Cambridge. Their team were Bovey Zheng, Naivasha Pratt-Jarvis, Pranoy Chaudhuri-Vayalambrone, and their own skipper Robert Jackson.

I thought that both teams sat on their buzzers a little for the first starter, It was so obviously alluding to Beatrix Potter, the famous ale juggling ceramicist. Eventually Naivasha Pratt-Jarvis buzzed in to earn bonuses on librarians. They took two. Painting – Diner – and – four figures were enough to give me Hopper’s Nighthawks for the next starter, and Isaac Brown was hot on my heels with the same. Alumni of the Slade School of Art brought us both just the one bonus. None of us knew the answer to the organic chemistry starter which followed, but apparently the answer is an amine, which I think once attacked the crew of the Enterprise during an episode of the original series of Star Trek. I have to be honest, with the next starter, as soon as it became clear it was a female character from Shakespeare, I would have been tempted to sling buzzer and go for Lady Macbeth straightaway. I’d have been right to do so as well. Robert Jackson hit the buzzer as soon as he heard the word monster. This brought Downing a set of bonuses on physiology. By the time that I zoned back in again, they had scored a full house which brought us nicely to the picture starter. This was a nice UC special. It was a definition, in Spanish, of a single Spanish word which is used in English as well. This one, with drink, water and wine all int eh definition, was always going to be sangria. Isaac Brown was first to see it. Three more of the same provided Lady Margaret Hall with their own full house. I’ll be honest, there can’t have been that many world shaking books published in Germany in 1867, so I thought I was in with a good shout when I went for Das Kapital. Robert Jackson felt the same thing obviously, and this brought bonuses on repetition. This brought bonuses on repetition. Boom boom. One correct answer added 5 to their score. Interesting to see Marx as a bonus answer when the answer to the starter had been Das Kapital. You rarely see that sort of thing happen in a GK round. Nobody knew two of the three great capitals of China other than Berlin. So, at just after the 10 minute mark, Downing led by 60 – 40, with both teams looking up for the competition.

I’ve never heard of the Cheyne -Stokes breathing cycle, but Pranoy Chaudhuri-Vayalambrone had, and buzzed in correctly. 16th century rulers provided a relatively benign set, and Downing put all of these low hanging fruit into their metaphorical basket. I didn’t even understand the next question, but Row Janjuah came in very early with the answer of cadence. Lawyers in Charles Dickens were all gettable, but Lady Margaret Hall (LMH from here on in) took 2. Eastern diamondback gave me rattlesnake, for the next, and evidently Row Janjuah too, who took his double with this one. Recent winners of the Pulitzer Prize for History offered them the chance to draw level with Downing, but they failed to trouble the scorer here. So to the musc starter. How ironic – I was in Vienna last week – locely time, thanks for asking – and we heard the zither-played strains of the theme from the film “The Third Man”. As JP offered ‘Come on! That’s one of the most famous films – “Robert Jackson offered “The Godfather” to predictable indignation from JP. “Matthew Le Croisette decided he was having some of this action too, and offered “Ratatouille.” A fantastic UC special starter saw us given Kirkcaldy and Blenheim Palace – the birthplaces of the historical figures on the £20 and £5 notes, and asked what £10 would be. Mary Lobo worked out that it was Jane Austen, so had to be Hampshire. Lovely question that. The music bonuses, three more leitmotifs used in film soundtracks, provided just the one bonus, but more importantly brought the scores level. At this point you’d have been forgiven for thinking that both teams had a very good chance of reaching the magic target of 150, which would at least guarantee a repechage slot. Nobody knew the lagest city of Bolivia, Santa Cruz de la Sierra. Nobody knew Sir George Grove for the next starter either. My lap of honour finally materialised with the next starter, a lovely UC special which involved working out that if you multiplied helium- 2 on the periodic table – by beryllium – 4 then you got oxygen – 8. Matthew Le Croisette took a little longer than I did. The next three bonuses were all connected with gyres. It seemed a long time since Downing had answered a starter, but Bovey Zheng identified Spurn Head as being in the Humber estuary. One correct answer put them into triple figures. However LMH were the leaders by 5 at just after the 20 minute mark.

For the second picture starter we saw a detail of a painting, in which a small bird was depicted. I’ll be honest, style and colours screamed Rousseau to me, and also to Isaac Brown I dare say. More details from paintings in which birds were depicted brought them two more correct answers. Now, when you’re behind, I’ve always said that you’re better off being hung for a sheep rather than a lamb, so I don’t blame Naivasha Pratt-Jarvis for giving it a lash on the next question. However she came in after just hearing “Which Spanish artist – “ and let’s be fair, there are 4 hardy Spanish artist perennials which often feature in UC questions. She gave us Velazquez, she might just as well have said ‘Picasso’ or Dali’ but the answer was Goya, which became clear with the full question. Isaac Brown had that. Bonuses on the works of Stephen Hawking were enough to bring LMH the magic total of 150, so whatever happened we’d be seeing them again. Nobody recognised surgical retractors for the next starter. Bovey Zheng gave Downing some hope, knowing that osier and other trees are species of willow. Winners of the Copa Libertadores Trophy brought just one bonus, and they were still going to need at least two visits to the table to reach the repechage at least. Pranoy Chaudhuri-Vayalambrone provided one of the starters they needed, completing a Dorothy Parker couplet with doubt. Two bonuses took them to 130, just a starter and two bonuses away from safety. I was surprised that nobody could work out that the two of Kipling’s six honest serving men which are anagrams of each other are how and who. Neither team worked out Samuel Coleridge-Taylor for the next starter. Now, I knew that the only world war year in which a census could have taken place was 1941, so that had to be the year ending in a 1 when a census wasn’t taken. I don’t know if Robert Jackson used the same reckoning to work it out, but he came up with the same answer. Two bonuses on the Pacific Islands to qualify, and three to win. They took the first, but were cruelly gonged before answering the second.

Let’s get the technicalities out of the way first. Jesus, Oxford, Durham and Downing all scored 145. So the two teams going through which will be revealed next week, will eb the ones who needed to hear the fewest questions to reach their total. Fair enough. Got to separate them somehow.

This was a terrific contest, and an exciting match. I don’t think either of them were amongst the best teams we’ve seen all series, but hey, it was a good show. Let’s settle for that.

Jeremy Paxman Watch

A little aside, when JP dubbed churros as ‘the slimmer’s friend’ was pretty much all there was from him in the first ten minutes or so. In the music starter his reaction of “Noooooooo!!!!” when Robert Jackson offered “The Godfather” for “The Third Man” was exaggerated beyond it’s natural lifespan. Matthew Le Croisette’s follow up suggestion of Ratatouille gave him the opportunity to respond in high dudgeon, “Ratatouille?!” then administer the coup de grace with the put down “meretricious offerings!”.

Interesting Fact That I Didn’t Already Know Of The Week

Loads and loads of things I didn’t know in this, but none of them so interesting that they stuck out for me. Sorry.

Saturday, 2 November 2019

Mastermind 2020 - Heat 11


Hello, good morning, and yes, I had a lovely time in Vienna, thanks for asking. I made sure I was back in time for Mastermind yesterday, mind you. Well, you can have too much of a good thing you know.

So to the show. First up was Hugh Ashton. I don’t normally comment on contenders’ appearance, for fear that they might well start commenting on mine, but I have to congratulate Hugh for his rather wonderful waistcoat and bow tie combination. This – I thought – is someone who has a bit of confidence. Mind you, he did miss his first question on that Mastermind hardy perennial, the “Mapp and Lucia” novels of E.F. Benson, who must have written them during the intervals between performances with her all-girl band. He soon shrugged that off, though to finish with 11 and no passes. Certainly, at the least that’s an in contention at half time score.

Jane Nelson who followed gave us Manchester City FC 1992 – present day. Hmm, not quite 30 years. I mean, I’m not trying to insinuate that this isn’t a long enough time period to make a set of sufficiently testing questions, but am I alone in having a nostalgic hankering for the days when a contender would have to take the whole history of a club, or a sporting event, rather than just a selected period? Oh, I am – okay then, moving on. Jane knew her subject very well, but a rather deliberate and steady way of answering meant that she was limited to an even ten points.

So to Muhammad Ali. Muhammad was answering on Greek Mythology. Now there’s a traditional Mastermind subject for you – a particularly wide traditional Mastermind subject. Muhammad scored 4. 3 of these were to the first three questions. He also got the last question right. Now, we can only judge from what we see on the screen, so I may be completely wrong about what I think happened. But for what it’s worth, it looked from his answers that Muhammad knew a bit about Greek mythology, and thought that it would be enough. Surely if he’d have prepared thoroughly he wouldn’t have missed some absolute sitters, like Ariadne. He didn’t look particularly nervous, but hey, only he could really say what went wrong in the round.

The life and written works of Harper Lee, offered to us by Poppy Bradshaw, brought the specialists to a conclusion. Apparently she did write other things than To Kill and Mockingbird, and the recently published Go Set a Watchman. That’s Harper Lee, by the way, not Poppy. A decent round followed, although I think Poppy had just undercooked her preparation a little on Harper Lee’s journalist career.

More light for me was thrown on Muhammad’s first round problems by his second round. He didn’t absolutely smash it, however he did score 9, which John called a respectful score – which it may well have been – although I’m pretty sure that he meant it was a respectable score. Which it certainly was. So was this a case of someone who knows he has a respectable general knowledge deciding to enter the show, as is his right, then deciding specialist subjects and taking it for granted his prior knowledge of the subject would see him through? Again, only Muhammad could tell us the answer to that one.

Poppy, sadly, did not get congratulated by John for reaching a respectful score, as she added just 5 to her total, and fell into a pass spiral. I always feel I want to be a bit careful when I write about low scoring GK rounds, because it may well come across that I’m criticising the contender. I’m really not. Posting a low score in a Mastermind GK round proves nothing  other than you didn’t know the answers to most of the questions you were asked. It suggests that you don’t perhaps at this time have the standard of General Knowledge that you really need to appear on the show, but that’s about it. It has nothing to do with your intelligence. However, that is the conclusion that many people often draw, and I do feel that the production team has a duty of care towards contenders. However much they want to appear on the show, I would imagine that sitting there on the chair while you’re enduring a round like Poppy’s cannot be a pleasant experience. To be honest, as a viewer I do find it uncomfortable as well. In the last 5 shows we’ve seen 5 GK scores of 5 or less. This is just how I feel, and feel free to disagree, but I do tend to feel that if you can’t score 6 or more on a GK round, then you should not be put in the position of having to endure one. Now, ok, I am sure that there have always been contenders who score decently in their auditions, and then have a ‘mare on the show, but 5 in 5 shows? Come on – and I said this last year as well – that’s the sort of batting average that suggests that quality control in the selection process is not all it could be.

Thankfully Jane and Hugh both avoided such traumatic rounds themselves. Jane was a point behind at the halfway stage, and the rather measured style of her answers in the first round suggested that in order to be able to set a challenging target she was going to have to answer pretty accurately. To be fair, she didn’t do at all badly either. Okay, 10 points for 20 wasn’t necessarily a huge target, but it meant that Hugh was going to have to have a good round to score enough points to beat it.

Which he did, and as often happens, for the first minute of his round he looked like he’d do it with a good couple of points to scare. However the wrong answers mid round took away a bit of momentum, but he made it, scoring his own ten in the process. That one point by which he’d beaten Jane in the Specialist rounds was enough to give him the win. Well played sir.



The Details

Hugh Ashton
The Mapp and Lucia Novels of E.F. Benson
11
0
10
0
21
0
Jane Nelson
The History of Manchester City FC 1992 - present
10
0

10
0
20
0
Muhammad Ali
Greek Mythology
4
1
9
1
13
2
Poppy Bradshaw
The Life and Written Works of Harper Lee
7
1
4
7
11
8