There are, dearly beloved, certain
specialist subjects which I’m sure go down on more application forms than
others. Such a subject was offered by our first contender last night, Madeline
Grant, in the shape of the Harry Potter novels. Last time out was in 2015, when
Barbara Flaherty scored a perfect 15 from 15, and before that in the 2012 Sleb
series, and the 2011 series proper. Madeline produced a perfect round, and you
cannot do better than that. I’ve read and enjoyed all of the novels, and I have
to say that these were as testing a set of questions as you’d get on any
subject – put it another way, you really had to know your stuff to have a
chance of a good score on this.
Burdened with support from the Clark
sofa last night was teacher Peter Stiles. He offered us The Battle of the Bulge
as a subject. Now, twice during the specialist rounds last night I was struck
by the way the effect of the black chair can sometimes make contenders miss out
on one of the simpler questions. In Peter’s case it was Robert Shaw Von
Runstedt, which I bet he would normally answer without a second thought. 9 was
a perfectly respectable score, but with a 6 point lead to overhaul I couldn’t
see him progressing to the semis.
Now, Allan Cook produced another
excellent round, his subject being Juliet Stevenson Rosalind Franklin.
For the uninitiated, Rosalind Franklin was the X Ray crystallographer who
played a vital role in the discovery and final confirmation of the structure of
DNA. Allan answered very accurately, but his technique was an interesting
contrast to Madeline’s. Madeline gave her answers as quickly as possible, while
Allan’s answers were built for comfort rather than speed. I don’t blame him for
this – an accurate 12 is far better than a lightning fast 10. Still, at least
he had given himself a shot.
Finally Nick Gunatilleke, who gave us
the Waterloo Campaign, and the second example of missing out on the relative
sitter. I bet you that Nick has never failed to answer the name of Christopher
Plummer The Duke of Wellington’s horse before, and never will again. He did
rally after this nervous start though, and produced a respectable round of 9.
Sadly, though, this meant that that at the turn around we were really left with
a two horse race, and one of those horses was a long shot.
Peter, then, returned to the chair
for his GK round. I’m always glad to see a contender reach double figures on
GK. If you can manage that, then you’ve got nothing to beat yourself up over,
and Peter did manage 10. With the best will in the world though this was never
going to win this show. Nick gave it a lash, but he finished with 16 overall.
Allan Cook actually produced the best
GK round of the night. In my heart of hearts I felt that he needed at least 13
to really give himself a chance and to put Madeline into the corridor of doubt.
His 11 was perfectly respectable, but it did leave Madeline needing just 9 for
an outright win. I do think that there’s quite a big psychological difference
between the prospect of needing 9, and the prospect of needing 10 – it’s only 1
point, but double figures are a lot more daunting than single figures.
Madeline left little doubt that she
was going to win after her first minute. She looked a little nervous as she sat
back down in the chair, but her performance belied that, as she ripped through
the first 90 seconds or so of the questions. In the last minute she did run out
of steam a little, as the incorrect answers started to accrue, but in the
context of this heat this was immaterial to the outcome of the show. 10 correct
answers gave her a winning total of 25 and no passes. A good performance, and
best of luck in the semis.
The Details
Madeline Grant
|
The Harry Potter Novels
|
15
|
0
|
10
|
0
|
25
|
0
|
Peter Stiles
|
The Battle of the Bulge
|
9
|
0
|
10
|
2
|
19
|
2
|
Allan Cook
|
Rosalind Franklin
|
12
|
0
|
11
|
2
|
23
|
2
|
Nick Gunatilleke
|
The Waterloo Campaign
|
9
|
1
|
7
|
5
|
16
|
6
|